Biomedical subjects

E W Korevaar

Publications and source records attributed to E W Korevaar.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A model to determine the initial phase space of a clinical electron beam from measured beam data.

Advanced electron beam dose calculation models for radiation oncology require as input an initial phase space (IPS) that describes a clinical electron beam. The IPS is a distribution in position, energy and direction of electrons and photons in a plane in front of the patient. A method is presented to derive the IPS of a clinical electron beam from a limited set of measured beam data. The electron beam is modelled by a sum of four beam components: a main diverging beam, applicator edge scatter, applicator transmission and a second diverging beam. The two diverging beam components are described by weighted sums of monoenergetic diverging electron and photon beams. The weight factors of these monoenergetic beams are determined by the method of simulated annealing such that a best fit is obtained with depth-dose curves measured for several field sizes at two source-surface distances. The resulting IPSs are applied by the phase-space evolution electron beam dose calculation model to calculate absolute 3D dose distributions. The accuracy of the calculated results is in general within 1.5% or 1.5 mm; worst cases show differences of up to 3% or 3 mm. The method presented here to describe clinical electron beams yields accurate results, requires only a limited set of measurements and might be considered as an alternative to the use of Monte Carlo methods to generate full initial phase spaces.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed2000

Accuracy of the phase space evolution dose calculation model for clinical 25 MeV electron beams.

The phase space evolution (PSE) model is a dose calculation model for electron beams in radiation oncology developed with the aim of a higher accuracy than the commonly used pencil beam (PB) models and with shorter calculation times than needed for Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. In this paper the accuracy of the PSE model has been investigated for 25 MeV electron beams of a MM50 racetrack microtron (Scanditronix Medical AB, Sweden) and compared with the results of a PB model. Measurements have been performed for tests like non-standard SSD, irregularly shaped fields, oblique incidence and in phantoms with heterogeneities of air, bone and lung. MC calculations have been performed as well, to reveal possible errors in the measurements and/or possible inaccuracies in the interaction data used for the bone and lung substitute materials. Results show a good agreement between PSE calculated dose distributions and measurements. For all points the differences--in absolute dose--were generally well within 3% and 3 mm. However, the PSE model was found to be less accurate in large regions of low-density material and errors of up to 6% were found for the lung phantom. Results of the PB model show larger deviations, with differences of up to 6% and 6 mm and of up to 10% for the lung phantom; at shortened SSDs the dose was overestimated by up to 6%. The agreement between MC calculations and measurement was good. For the bone and the lung phantom maximum deviations of 4% and 3% were found, caused by uncertainties about the actual interaction data. In conclusion, using the phase space evolution model, absolute 3D dose distributions of 25 MeV electron beams can be calculated with sufficient accuracy in most cases. The accuracy is significantly better than for a pencil beam model. In regions of lung tissue, a Monte Carlo model yields more accurate results than the current implementation of the PSE model.

Air↗

PubMed1999

Mixing intensity modulated electron and photon beams: combining a steep dose fall-off at depth with sharp and depth-independent penumbras and flat beam profiles.

For application in radiotherapy, intensity modulated high-energy electron and photon beams were mixed to create dose distributions that feature: (a) a steep dose fall-off at larger depths, similar to pure electron beams, (b) flat beam profiles and sharp and depth-independent beam penumbras, as in photon beams, and (c) a selectable skin dose that is lower than for pure electron beams. To determine the required electron and photon beam fluence profiles, an inverse treatment planning algorithm was used. Mixed beams were realized at a MM50 racetrack microtron (Scanditronix Medical AB, Sweden), and evaluated by the dose distributions measured in a water phantom. The multileaf collimator of the MM50 was used in a static mode to shape overlapping electron beam segments, and the dynamic multileaf collimation mode was used to realize the intensity modulated photon beam profiles. Examples of mixed beams were generated at electron energies of up to 40 MeV. The intensity modulated electron beam component consists of two overlapping concentric fields with optimized field sizes, yielding broad, fairly depth-independent overall beam penumbras. The matched intensity modulated photon beam component has high fluence peaks at the field edges to sharpen this penumbra. The combination of the electron and the photon beams yields dose distributions with the characteristics (a)-(c) mentioned above.

Electrons↗

PubMed1998

Sharpening the penumbra of high energy electron beams with low weight narrow photon beams.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High energy (20-50 MeV) electron beams, available from the MM50 Racetrack Microtron, can be used for the treatment of deep-seated tumors. A disadvantage is the increasing penumbra width as a function of depth. By the addition of a narrow (typically 1 cm wide) photon beam near the field edge, the 50-90% penumbra width of the electron beam is reduced, yielding a significantly increased effective field size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For rectangular electron beams in a water phantom (energies 25 and 40 MeV, field sizes 5 x 5-15 x 15 cm2) a computer program was used to optimize the photon beam parameters (position, weight and width) to obtain a combined beam with the sharpest penumbra at the optimization depth and a beam flatness within certain constraints. The study furthermore included penumbra sharpening of an irregular multileaf collimator-shaped field. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: At optimization depths near R90, photon beam addition reduces the penumbra width by 40-50% (from 15-20 mm to 8-10 mm). Beam flatness at the optimization depth is within +/-5% and hot-spots are < or =120% for all depths. By the addition of narrow photon beams around the rectangular or irregular field, the electron field width can be reduced by 1-3 cm, while the effective field size is maintained.

Electrons↗

PubMed1997

Numerical calculation of energy deposition by high-energy electron beams: III-B. Improvements to the 6D phase space evolution model.

The phase space evolution model of Huizenga and Storchi, Morawska-Kaczyńska and Huizenga and Janssen et al has been modified to (i) allow application on currently available computer equipment with limited memory (128 Megabytes) and (ii) allow 3D dose calculations based on 3D computer tomographic patient data. This is a further development aimed at the use of the phase space evolution model in radiotherapy electrons beam treatment planning. The first modification regards the application of depth evolution of the phase space state combined with an alternative method to transport back-scattered electrons. This depth evolution method requires of the order of 15 times less computer memory than the energy evolution method. Results of previous and new electron transport methods are compared and show that the new electron transport method for back-scattered electrons hardly affects the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions. The second modification regards the simulation of electron transport through tissues with varying densities by applying distributed electron transport through similarly composed media with a limited number of fixed densities. Results of non-distributed and distributed electron transport are compared and show that the distributed electron transport method hardly affects the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions. It is also shown that the results of the new dose distribution calculations are still in good agreement with and require significantly less computation time than results obtained with the EGS4 Monte Carlo method.

Electrons↗

PubMed1996

Phase space evolution distribution functions for high energy electron beams.

The phase space evolution (PSE) model is a 3D electron beam dose calculation model for radiation oncology. The PSE model is based upon the transport of electrons with a specific energy and direction over short distances (typically 0.3-1 cm). The result of the transport of these electrons is described by an energy and direction distribution of the electrons, which is stored in a database. The database is used by the PSE model at the time of the actual electron transport simulation. A good agreement between dose distributions calculated by the PSE model and EGS4 Monte Carlo code for mono-energetic, mono-directional electron beams was found. The differences in point dose are within 1-2% of the maximum dose. These differences can be caused by errors in the database used, or by assumptions made in the PSE model. The aim of this paper is to get more insight into the possible errors introduced by the database. Results show that the data in the database are in good agreement with EGS4 calculated data. Also the influence of the database on a PSE calculated dose distribution has been investigated. The differences between a PSE calculated dose distribution and an EGS4 calculated dose distribution can be reduced to < 0.5% if the database is replaced by a database partly created by EGS4. This shows that small errors in the database have a distinct effect on the dose distribution, and that this dose distribution can be calculated accurately by the PSE model if the right database is used.

Computer Simulation↗