PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Waisman

Publications and source records attributed to E Waisman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Knowledge, concern, and satisfaction among augmentation mammaplasty patients.

Eighty-five patients with augmentation mammaplasty were surveyed. Patients were polled about knowledge of risks, level of concern, awareness of media publicity, incidence of complications, and degree of satisfaction with breast implants. Sixty-one percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with implants, whereas 32% were somewhat or very unsatisfied. Level of satisfaction was not related to knowledge of risks, but did correlate with having experienced side effects or complications. Virtually all patients were aware of recent media publicity about implants, and 90% of women perceived the publicity to be negative. Seventy-five percent of the patients expressed concern about implant safety. Even after exposure to negative publicity, however, < 10% of those surveyed regret having had the surgery and only 6% indicated they would like their implants removed. Overall, patients with augmentation mammaplasty perceive the benefits of implants greatly outweigh the risks.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty.

Thirty-five augmented women underwent mammography using both the standard implant-compression technique and, when possible, the implant-displacement technique; all had preaugmentation film-screen mammography available for evaluation. The area of mammographically visualized breast tissue before and after augmentation mammaplasty was measured using a transparent grid. Patients with subglandular implants had a mean decrease of 49 percent of measurable tissue area with compression mammography and a 39 percent decrease with displacement mammography. Patients with submuscular implants had a 28 percent decrease in measurable tissue area with compression mammography and a 9 percent decrease with displacement mammography. Anterior breast tissue was seen better with displacement mammography; posterior breast tissue, with compression mammography. Most patients had some degree of parenchymal scarring and lower image quality after augmentation. State-of-the-art mammography was not possible in most patients augmented with silicone-gel-filled implants.

Breast↗
PubMed1990

Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is valuable, yet only a small percentage of eligible patients ever have reconstruction. Little has been done to determine why so few patients proceed with reconstructive surgery. A homogeneous population of mastectomy patients, some of whom underwent breast reconstruction while others did not, were surveyed regarding their attitudes about breast reconstruction. A total of 245 women were surveyed. One-hundred and fifty-eight (64 percent) responded, 71 of whom had been reconstructed while 87 had not. Comparison of the responses of the two groups suggests factors that play a role in determining whether the mastectomy patient will accept or decline the option of breast reconstruction. Considerations that made it less likely that a woman would pursue reconstruction included advanced age at the time of mastectomy, concern about complications from further surgery, uncertainty about outcome, and fear about the effect of reconstruction on future problems with breast cancer. Marital status, receiving chemotherapy, or knowing a patient who had a bad result from reconstruction did not affect the decision. An awareness and understanding of these factors may be helpful to physicians in counseling patients and in increasing the number of women who enjoy the benefits of breast reconstruction.

Adult↗