PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Zamba-Papanicolaou

Publications and source records attributed to E Zamba-Papanicolaou.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Phenotypic and cellular expression of two novel connexin32 mutations causing CMT1X.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the phenotypic and cellular expression of two novel connexin32 (Cx32) mutations causing X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT1X). METHODS: The authors evaluated several members of two families with CMT1X clinically, electrophysiologically, pathologically, and by genetic testing. The Cx32 mutations were expressed in vitro and studied by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: In both families, men were more severely affected than women with onset in the second decade of life. In the first family, the phenotype was that of demyelinating polyneuropathy with variable involvement of peripheral nerves. There was clinical evidence of CNS involvement in at least three of the patients, with extensor plantar responses and brisk reflexes. In the second family, the affected man presented with symmetric polyneuropathy and intermediate slowing of conduction velocities, whereas affected women had prominent asymmetric atrophy of the leg muscles. The authors identified two novel missense mutations resulting in L143P amino acid substitution in the first family and in V140E substitution in the second family, both located in the third transmembrane domain of Cx32. Expression of these Cx32 mutations in communication-incompetent HeLa cells and immunocytochemical analysis revealed that both mutants were retained intracellularly and were localized in the Golgi apparatus. In contrast to wild-type protein, they did not form gap junctions. CONCLUSION: These novel connexin32 (Cx32) mutations cause a spectrum of clinical manifestations characteristic of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT1X), including demyelinating or intermediate polyneuropathy, which is often asymmetric, and CNS involvement in one family. The position and cellular expression of Cx32 mutations alone cannot fully predict these phenotypic variations in CMT1X.

Aged↗

Click evoked neurogenic vestibular potentials (NVESTEPs): a method of assessing the function of the vestibular system.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials (NVESTEPs) with surface scalp recording using high intensity auditory clicks. The same stimulus is used in myogenic vestibular evoked potentials which has been shown to evoke potentials in the vestibular division of the vestibulocochlear nerve. METHODS: A whole head recording with surface EEG electrodes was performed using high intensity clicks in one normal volunteer to determine the best recording position for vestibular evoked potentials. The results were compared to responses at moderate click intensities used for brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). The difference in the location of the two responses on the scalp was assumed to be from the vestibular system. RESULTS: Responses specific to the high intensity clicks were best obtained in the parietal areas, with no reproducible responses obtained in the same area with moderate intensity clicks normally used in BAEPs. Recordings in neurologically normal volunteers showed a consistent response with a negative polarity at around 3 ms, which we therefore called N3. Two case studies are presented. The first case is a patient with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss with NVESTEPs present, suggesting that NVESTEPs is not a cochlear response. The second case is a patient with multiple sclerosis with demyelinating lesions in the pons and an unobtainable NVESTEP response. CONCLUSION: NVESTEPs is a possible new diagnostic technique that may be specific for the vestibular pathway. It has potential use in patients with symptoms of dizziness, subclinical symptoms in multiple sclerosis, and in disorders specific for the vestibular nerve.

Adolescent↗

Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials using a tone pip auditory stimulus.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials (NVESTEPs) with surface scalp recording using a tone pip auditory stimulus. METHODS: Fourteen neurologically normal volunteers (Age range 26-45 years, 10 females and 4 males), and two patients with sensorineural hearing loss and possible multiple sclerosis respectively, were examined. Two channel recordings were obtained, the first channel being P3 referred to Fpz, and the second channel being P4 referred to Fpz. A 1 kHz tone pip stimulus with two cycles was delivered via headphones monoaurally with contralateral masking noise. RESULTS: A consistent negative wave with a mean absolute latency of 4.72 msec was obtained, which we have named N5. 25% of the ears tested had better responses at the ipsilateral parietal electrode. In the patient with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, NVESTEPs was present, suggesting that the NVESTEP is not a cochlear response. In the patient with possible multiple sclerosis, an abnormal NVESTEP response and a normal BAEP response were found. CONCLUSION: Use of a tone-pip rather than a click auditory stimulus allows a lower click intensity to be used in the production of NVESTEP responses, leads to a shorter testing time, and is therefore more comfortable for the patient. This study adds to our impression that the NVESTEP may be a physiological response that can be used to assess the vestibular system and is different from the BAEP response. Further testing in patients with symptoms of dizziness and with disorders specific for the vestibular nerve is required.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of neurogenic vesibular evoked potential (NVESTEP) studies in comparison with other paraclinical tests in demonstrating dissemination in time and space in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and in identifying clinically silent lesions. METHOD: All patients in whom MS was suspected but the diagnosis of MS was not possible based on the McDonald criteria were included in this study. We studied 14 patients and performed visual, brainstem auditory, somatosensory and neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials in all patients, together with MRI and CSF analysis of oligoclonal bands (OB). RESULTS: Two out of the thirteen patients could be movedfrom the category of "possible MS" to "MS" using the McDonald criteria based on an abnormal NVESTEP result. CONCLUSION: Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials are potentially useful in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with possible MS.

Acoustic Stimulation↗