PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E van Wassenhove

Publications and source records attributed to E van Wassenhove.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical observations with a dual sensor rate adaptive single chamber pacemaker.

The Topaz model 515 (Vitatron B.V.) is a dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker for single chamber stimulation. It can be driven by activity counts (ACT) and QT interval measurements. Inappropriate rate modulation due to one sensor can be corrected by "sensor cross-checking." It was implanted in ten patients (20-86 years) of whom seven had complete heart block and atrial arrhythmias. After implantation T-wave amplitude ranged from 0.9 mV-3.5 mV. T-wave sensing ranged from 88%-99% in 9/10 patients at the follow-up of 3 weeks. Eight patients remained in default setting of the activity threshold, after evaluation with a short walking test. An exercise test was performed on all patients. In one test, QT sensing was marginal because of lead implantation in the right ventricular outflow tract. Therefore, this pacing rate was only modulated by ACT sensing. All others were tested with equal contribution of information from both sensors (ACT = QT). In 7/9, rate response was satisfactory. When the treadmill was repeated with ACT in five of these seven patients, rate generally accelerated too fast. In one patient the setting was adjusted to "QT > ACT," because of inappropriate acceleration due to activity sensing, in another it was adjusted to "QT < ACT" because of delayed response to activity. The pacing rate and the ACT during treadmill tests in "QT = ACT" mode were more closely correlated in the first 3 minutes, compared with the last 3 minutes. We feel that rate modulation with this new pacemaker is adequate. Sensor blending and sensor cross-checking are of clinical importance.

Acceleration↗

Atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber pacing and their influence on long-term mortality.

A retrospective study of 252 patients who received a DDD pacemaker between October 1982 and December 1990 was performed. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, reprogramming to the VVI mode was necessary in 39 patients (15.5%). Technical problems causing downgrading occurred 15 times, of which 13 problems became permanent. A total number of 24 patients had sustained atrial arrhythmias, including 14 with atrial fibrillation and 10 with atrial flutter. In this group, conversion to sinus rhythm could be obtained in 38%. After 2 years, reliable DDD pacing was maintained in 86% of the surviving patients. The survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% and 89%, respectively, and was not influenced by arrhythmias or technical problems. We conclude that atrial arrhythmias including flutter are the most important reasons for reprogramming to the VVI mode, although in an important number of patients, predominantly those with flutter, restoration of AV synchrony can be obtained. The high number of patients with atrial flutter could imply some role for DDD devices offering the option of antitachycardia pacing. Reprogramming of the pacing mode did not influence mortality.

Arrhythmia, Sinus↗

2:1 atrial capture as the cause of pacemaker alternans.

Two patients with sinus node disease and a physiologic pacemaker presented with 2:1 atrial capture. Both atrial leads were screw-in leads (6957 J, Medtronic), with normal position on X-rays. When atrial capture was absent, paced QRS complexes resulted in retrograde conduction to the atria. The next atrial spike was followed by a P wave and normal AV conduction. With atrial screw-in leads, alternating atrial capture may be caused by an altered ventricular and atrial contraction pattern, when retrograde conduction exists. Its presence may precede permanent exit block by several weeks.

Aged↗