PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Earllaine Croarkin

Publications and source records attributed to Earllaine Croarkin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Changes in neurologic function tests may predict neurotoxicity caused by ixabepilone.

PURPOSE: To investigate baseline factors and neurologic function tests (NFTs) that may predict the development of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy (PN) after treatment with ixabepilone, an epothilone microtubule-stabilizing agent with antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced breast cancer patients were treated with ixabepilone (6 mg/m2) for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks in a phase II clinical trial. Physical examinations, questionnaires, nerve conduction studies, and NFTs, including the Jebsen Test of Hand Function (JTH) and the Grooved Pegboard Test (GPT), were performed at baseline and during subsequent cycles. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients assessable for PN received a median of five cycles of therapy (range, one to 22 cycles). Nine of these patients developed grade 2 PN, and two developed grade 3 PN, with a median time to onset of 144 days (range, 6 to 189 days). Among these 11 patients, PN resolved in eight patients, with a median of 15 days (range, 6 to 346 days) after onset, but PN did not resolve in three patients during follow-ups at 76, 361, and 746 days after onset. GPT and changes of JTH scores at onset of PN were significantly different between patients with and without PN at comparable follow-up times (P = .006 and P = .002, respectively). Changes in GPT and JTH scores over the first two cycles were often associated with the development of PN by exploratory actuarial analysis. CONCLUSION: Serious ixabepilone-induced neuropathy was relatively rare on the treatment schedule used. NFTs, such as JTH and GPT, may have utility for predicting PN, but further testing is needed.

Adult↗

Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Tests of upper-extremity motor function used for people following a stroke have been described, but reliability and validity (psychometric properties) of measurements obtained with these tests have not been consistently established. This investigation was performed: (1) to review literature relative to upper-extremity motor function testing during rehabilitation following a stroke, (2) to develop selection criteria for identifying these tests in the literature, and (3) to rate the tests relative to their psychometric properties. METHOD: Literature searches were done using 2 databases. Reports of 4 psychometric properties were sought: interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity or concurrent validity, and predictive validity. RESULTS: Nine tests met the inclusion criteria of having psychometric properties reported in the literature. No test had evidence for all 4 psychometric properties. Only the Nine-Hole Peg Test was supported by 3 out of 4 properties. Most tests had 2 properties supported. Concurrent validity or convergent validity was most frequently described; test-retest reliability was least frequently described. CONCLUSIONS: More complete psychometric support is needed for upper-extremity motor function tests applied following a stroke. The absence of psychometric support, however, does not mean that a test has no value. Clinicians are cautioned not to generalize psychometric evidence.

Disability Evaluation↗

Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation.

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI), a standardized intensive rehabilitation intervention, was given to patients a year or more following stroke. The goal was to determine if CI was more effective than a less-intensive control intervention in changing motor function and/or brain physiology and to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying this recovery process. Subjects were recruited and randomized more than 1 year after a single subcortical infarction. Clinical assessments performed before and after the intervention and at 6 months postintervention included the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), the Motor Activity Log (MAL), and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to map the motor cortex. Positron emission tomography was used to measure changes in motor task-related activation due to the intervention. MAL increased by 1.08 after CI therapy and decreased by 0.01 after control therapy. The difference between groups was significant (P < 0.001). Changes in WMFT and AMPS were not significantly different between groups. Cerebral activation during a motor task decreased significantly, and motor map size increased in the affected hemisphere motor cortex in CI patients but not in control patients. Both changes may reflect improved ability of upper motor neurons to produce movement.

Adult↗