PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ebba Wergeland

Publications and source records attributed to Ebba Wergeland.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Self-reported work-related health problems from the Oslo Health Study.

BACKGROUND: Lack of knowledge about the occurrence of work-related health problems in the general population makes it difficult to estimate the potential for their prevention in the workplace. AIMS: To examine the prevalence of self-reported work-related health problems among adult citizens of Oslo, Norway. METHODS: The study was part of the Oslo Health Study 2000-2001, in which all individuals in certain age cohorts were invited to a comprehensive health screening. All 30-, 40- and 45-year old subjects who attended the screening were asked if they had experienced any of 11 common health problems in the past month, and whether they considered these to be work-related. Of the 26,074 invitees in these age cohorts, 8,594 (33%) answered the questionnaire. RESULTS: Nearly 60% of subjects reported one or more work-related health problems, most commonly reported were pain in the neck/shoulders (38%) and low back pain (23%). Neck/shoulder pain was most frequently attributed to working conditions, by 74% of subjects with this problem; followed by arm pain (72%), fatigue (51%) and low back pain (50%). Work-related fractions for eczema and asthma symptoms were 23 and 18%, respectively. There were marked gender differences, but small age differences. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of common health problems in the Oslo population were attributed to working conditions. This implies a large preventive potential and call for increased preventive efforts targeted at known risk factors in the workplace.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Risk factors for accidental injuries in the construction industry].

BACKGROUND: The construction industry is prone to accidents. In Norway there is little research-based knowledge on accident pattern and risk factors. The main objective of the study was to examine whether in-depth studies of accidents in this industry, leading to injuries registered by the health services, could identify preventable risk factors and preventive measures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 accidents in the construction industry were thoroughly investigated. All had led to serious personal injury. Patients were interviewed after treatment in emergency wards and hospitals in Oslo, and inspections of the accident sites were performed. An interdisciplinary expert group discussed the accidents in order to identify risk factors and suggest preventive measures. The accident reports in the study were compared to reports from the Labour Inspectorate on the same accidents. RESULTS: The investigation identified several risk factors, and a number of detailed preventive measures were proposed. We submitted these proposals to the authorities and organisations involved. Accidents because of time pressure and electricity were two main groups. More than one third of the respondents said that time pressure had contributed to the accident. Accident risk caused by time pressure can be reduced by avoiding piecework contracts, unrealistic time limits, and the use of day penalties for breach of contract. Possible preventive measures for electric injuries imply modification of the reporting system and of the work organisation so that workers can comply with the regulations more easily. The study reports generally contained more information of relevance for prevention than the routine reports from the Labour Inspectorate did. For accidents reported by the Inspectorate to the police, their reports were more informative than the study reports. INTERPRETATION: By the method presented, we obtained detailed information about accidents and preventable risk factors, so that preventive measures could be proposed. The method can also be used for other types of accidents.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2004

A two-step medically based injury surveillance system--experiences from the Oslo injury register.

This paper presents a two-step injury surveillance system. In the first step, limited data (a minimum data set) on all (or a representative sample of all) injuries to residents and non-residents within a defined geographical area were obtained using routine collection procedures within the medical care system. The second step involved periodically sampling of specific injuries, injured persons, or places for in-depth investigations from the database established by the first step, or selecting relevant injured persons seeking treatment in the medical care system, to collect many data (an expanded data set) on a limited number of injuries. This system was implemented in Oslo. Data from about 48,000 injuries were collected annually. Two in-depth investigations of serious occupational injuries were carried out. The first involved 223 cases and the second, 50 cases. Some in-site studies were included. Experiences from the implementation in Oslo suggest that this system can function in the medical care system and provide data required for making estimates of injury incidence rates, establishing trends, and on contributing factors to injuries. A crucial factor in the success of the first part of such a system is to have enough resources for continuous quality control and feedback to personnel involved in the registration of data. Combining the registered data from general practitioners, accident and emergency departments, hospitals and notifications of fatalities in Oslo, and on assessments of the number of injuries treated by private clinics and occupational health centres in Oslo, and in the health care system outside of Oslo, leads to the conclusion that 11.9% of the residents of Oslo will annually be treated for an injury.

Epidemiologic Methods↗
PubMed2003

[Underreporting of occupational injuries to the Labour Inspection].

BACKGROUND: The Labour Inspection investigates occupational accidents and publishes injury statistics annually. Information is based upon two main sources: Copies of reports to the National Insurance Service and mandatory reports from employers to the Labour Inspection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Occupational injuries treated by Oslo Emergency Ward and Oslo Ambulance Service during a period of three months were compared with injuries recorded by the Labour Inspection. RESULTS: Four months after the end of the study period, the Labour Inspection had received reports from the National Insurance Service on 150 (13%) of the 1,153 injuries recorded by Oslo Emergency Ward/Oslo Ambulance Service. Among all injuries registered, 208 were serious according to the criteria of the Labour Inspection. Only 19 (9%) of these were reported directly to the Labour Inspection from employers in accordance with the legal requirement. The study recorded 17 serious injuries caused by violence affecting employees; none of these were reported directly to the Labour Inspection. INTERPRETATION: Data on occupational injuries collected by the Labour Inspection are far from complete. In Oslo alone, the Labour Inspection may annually overlook some 900-1,000 serious injuries. Data quality can be improved and delayed reporting avoided by using information from doctors and medical institutions that provide treatment.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2003

[Occupational injuries in Oslo: a study of occupational injuries treated by the Oslo Emergency Ward and Oslo Ambulance Service].

BACKGROUND: There is little reliable information about the incidence and severity of occupational injuries in Norway. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Occupational injuries occurring at worksites in Oslo and treated by Oslo Emergency Ward or Oslo Ambulance Service were recorded over a period of three months. Patients with serious injuries were interviewed about the accident. RESULTS: 1153 injury incidents were registered, 229 (20%) of which were considered serious. Median age of patients was 32 years. Estimated annual incidence of injuries at worksites in Oslo treated by Oslo Emergency Ward/Oslo Ambulance Service was 14 per 1000 employees, for all injuries in Oslo requiring treatment, 20 per 1000 employees. Men had three times the incidence of women. The incidence was highest in the youngest age groups. Of those with serious injuries, 30% had a non-Scandinavian language as their first language. Electricians, carpenters and police officers had the highest observed incidences. 87 injuries (8%) were caused by violence. INTERPRETATION: The incidence of occupational injuries in Oslo is reduced by about 40% since the 1970s. There is, however, no reduction for women. Construction workers are still at high risk. Workers of non-Scandinavian origin are also at high risk, probably because of selection into high-risk occupations. The injury register provides a good overview, but in-depth studies are needed to identify specific risk factors.

Accidents, Occupational↗