PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eberhard Korsching

Publications and source records attributed to Eberhard Korsching.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of lung cancer risk detects the KLF6 gene.

A genome-wide association analysis using the Affymetrix 100K SNP array was carried out in a case-control study of lung cancer. Allele frequencies were estimated initially in DNA pools. Significant differences in allele frequency detected in the SNP array analysis were first tested in the same DNA pools by pyrosequencing and then by individual genotyping. DNA pooling analysis identified rs10508266 SNP, located approximately 12.5kb from the 5'-end of the KLF6 gene, as a marker showing significant association with lung cancer risk. Since the SNP was in significant linkage disequilibrium with the KLF6 gene region, we analyzed an Italian population of 338 lung adenocarcinoma cases and 335 controls for the possible role of the reported functional rs3750861 SNP, located 15.6kb from the rs10508266 SNP. The rs3750861 affects expression of KLF6 splicing variants in prostate cancer and we found that its rare allele is associated with reduced lung cancer risk (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8). A Norwegian replication series of 265 non small cell lung cancer cases, and 356 controls, however, did not confirm the association. In light of the reported functional involvement of the KLF6 gene in lung cancer and in other cancer types and to the functional nature of the rs3750861 SNP, our results suggest a potential involvement of KLF6 polymorphisms in lung cancer risk, although additional studies in large series are needed to confirm our findings and to elucidate the mechanism by which the KLF6 SNPs influence lung cancer risk.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Genetic background of different cancer cell lines influences the gene set involved in chromosome 8 mediated breast tumor suppression.

Several lines of evidence suggest that chromosome 8 is likely to harbor tumor-suppressor genes involved in breast cancer. We showed previously that microcell-mediated transfer of human chromosome 8 into breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 resulted in reversion of these cells to tumorigenicity and was accompanied by changes in the expression of a breast cancer-relevant gene set. In the present study, we demonstrated that transfer of human chromosome 8 into another breast cancer cell line, CAL51, strongly reduced the tumorigenic potential of these cells. Loss of the transferred chromosome 8 resulted in reappearance of the CAL51 phenotype. Microarray analysis identified 78 probe sets differentially expressed in the hybrids compared with in the CAL51 and the rerevertant cells. This signature was also reflected in a panel of breast tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases and was correlated with several prognostic markers including tumor size, grading, metastatic behavior, and estrogen receptor status. The expression patterns of seven genes highly expressed in the hybrids but down-regulated in the tumors and metastases (MYH11, CRYAB, C11ORF8, PDGFRL, PLAGL1, SH3BP5, and KIAA1026) were confirmed by RT-PCR and tissue microarray analyses. Unlike with the corresponding nontumorigenic phenotypes demonstrated for the MDA-MB-231- and CAL51-derived microcell hybrids, the respective differentially expressed genes strongly differed. However, the majority of genes in both gene sets could be integrated into a similar spectrum of biological processes and pathways, suggesting that alterations in gene expression are manifested at the level of functions and pathways rather than in individual genes.

Animals↗

Chromosomal losses of regions on 5q and lack of high-level amplifications at 8q24 are associated with favorable prognosis for ovarian serous carcinoma.

In this study, we describe characteristic chromosomal alterations in a consecutive series of 96 serous ovarian tumors by comparative genomic hybridization. We analyze their association with different pathways of progression, histological grade, and clinical outcome. The most striking difference between low-grade and high-grade serous carcinomas was seen in a higher incidence of chromosomal gains at 3q and 20q and losses of 13q in the high-grade carcinomas. In addition, high-level amplifications were significantly more frequent in high-grade carcinomas, specifically involving regions on 3q and 8q. Chromosomal amplifications of 19p and 19q and losses of 4q and 5q were among the most frequent changes found in both low-grade and high-grade carcinomas, distinguishing them from borderline tumors, which had very few recurrent alterations. The most significant impact on survival of patients with invasive carcinomas Stage II-IV was observed for high-level amplifications of regions on 8q (mean overall survival (OS) 69 versus 27 months, P = 0.0006). Interestingly, low-level gains on 8q do not show any impact compared to cases with no alteration. Surprisingly, chromosomal losses on 5q had a protective impact (mean OS 36 versus 76 months, P = 0.0007). Combination of both parameters resulted in two risk groups. Low risk: loss on 5q, no amplification on 8q (mean OS 84 months); high risk: no loss on 5q, amplification on 8q (mean OS 26 months). This difference is even more pronounced, if only cases with residual tumor of less than 2 cm are included, resulting in a 5-year survival of 100% and 0% (P = 0.0005).

Chromosome Aberrations↗

Improvements in the analysis strategy make single nucleotide polymorphism analysis a powerful tool in the detection and characterization of amplified chromosomal regions in human tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis (SNP) has recently been proposed as an alternative technique to comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for defining loss of heterozygosity and gene copy number changes in a single experimental setup. In order to assess the potential of SNP analysis to complement or, ultimately, substitute CGH results, we applied both techniques to five primary tumor samples and two tumor cell lines. This was complemented by dilution experiments based on normal lymphocyte DNA to decipher the lower detection limit for genetic alterations. METHODS/RESULTS: Using an in-house software tool, we demonstrated that SNP analysis permits the generation of chromosomal alteration patterns that largely resemble conventional CGH ratio profiles of a given tumor/cell line. Moreover, compared to CGH, our SNP software tool allows a much more detailed definition of amplicon sizes and involved candidate genes. This advantage even persisted when the technique was applied to DNA with more than 60% of nontumor content. However, the detection of chromosomal losses is severely hampered by the presence of nontumor DNA so that the use of the SNP technique should be limited to tumor samples with more than 80% tumor DNA. CONCLUSION: SNP analysis is a very valuable tool for the detection and characterization of high-level chromosomal amplifications in the vast majority of primary tumor samples. Our software tool improves the analysis of SNP data and the presentation of the results, bridging the gap to existing CGH knowledge (http://bioinformatics.uni-muenster.de, 'Publications and Supplements').

Algorithms↗

Profile of differentially expressed genes after transfer of chromosome 17 into the breast cancer cell line CAL51.

Previous studies have shown that transfer of chromosome 17 suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of the breast cancer cell line CAL51, suggesting the presence of putative tumor suppressor genes on this chromosome. Suppression subtractive hybridization and oligonucleotide microarray analyses were performed to identify differentially expressed genes in nontumorigenic microcell hybrids, CAL/17-1 and CAL/17-3, when compared with CAL51 cells. In total, 263 differentially expressed transcripts were associated with these phenotypes. Of these, a high percentage is involved in various biological processes associated with tumorigenesis, including DNA-dependent regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle, signal transduction, and cell proliferation. Microarray analysis of selected chromosome 17 genes in a series of 25 human primary breast tumors showed associations with clinicopathologic parameters of the tumors. Of these genes, TOB1 (transducer of ERBB2) was selected for further expression analysis. Using RT-PCR and immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays, we could reveal a differential mRNA and protein expression of TOB1 in the majority of breast tumors and lymph node metastases compared with normal breast tissues, indicating a potential role of this protein in breast tumorigenesis.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

The origin of vimentin expression in invasive breast cancer: epithelial-mesenchymal transition, myoepithelial histogenesis or histogenesis from progenitor cells with bilinear differentiation potential?

Vimentin expression is a rather rare finding in invasive breast cancer, and is associated with high tumour invasiveness and chemoresistance. It is currently explained by two different biological theories: direct histogenetic derivation from myoepithelial cells, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) reflecting the end-stage of breast cancer dedifferentiation. In this study we aimed to obtain further insights into the biological hallmarks of these vimentin-expressing breast cancers. We applied immunohistochemistry for vimentin and 15 other differentiation markers to a series of 364 invasive breast cancer cases, using tissue microarray technology. 7.7% of all tumours expressed vimentin. Almost all of these cases (19/21) were Grade 3 invasive ductal carcinomas, and the majority (13/21) of these were associated with a ductal in situ component. Vimentin expression was also seen in the respective in situ components and correlated positively with the expression of SMA, CD10, CK 5, p53, Mib-1 and EGFR. A negative correlation was seen for the expression of CK 8/18 and the oestrogen receptor. Vimentin-expressing carcinomas revealed a significantly higher average absolute number of cytogenetic alterations per case, but a significantly lower frequency of chromosome 16q losses compared to vimentin-negative cases. Our present results demonstrate that, despite analogies between vimentin-positive breast cancers and myoepithelial cells in their expression of differentiation-related proteins, neither myoepithelial histogenesis nor EMT can exclusively explain the biology of these distinct tumours. This is mainly supported by the significantly higher incidence of vimentin-expressing breast cancers compared to any other myoepithelial breast tumours and the fact that vimentin is already observed in ductal in situ components. We therefore propose the alternative hypothesis that vimentin-expressing breast carcinomas may derive from breast progenitor cells with bilinear (glandular and myoepithelial) differentiation potential.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Expression profiling of t(12;22) positive clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue cell lines reveals characteristic up-regulation of potential new marker genes including ERBB3.

Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (CCSST), also known as malignant melanoma of soft parts, represents a rare lesion of the musculoskeletal system usually affecting adolescents and young adults. CCSST is typified by a chromosomal t(12;22)(q13;q12) translocation resulting in a fusion between the Ewing sarcoma gene (EWSR1) and activating transcription factor 1 (ATF1), of which the activity in nontransformed cells is regulated by cyclic AMP. Our aim was to identify critical differentially expressed genes in CCSST tumor cells in comparison with other solid tumors affecting children and young adults to better understand signaling pathways regulating specific features of the development and progression of this tumor entity. We applied Affymetrix Human Genome U95Av2 oligonucleotide microarrays representing approximately 12,000 genes to generate the expression profiles of the CCSST cell lines GG-62, DTC-1, KAO, MST2, MST3, and Su-CC-S1 in comparison with 8 neuroblastoma, 7 Ewing tumor, and 6 osteosarcoma cell lines. Subsequent hierarchical clustering of microarray data clearly separated all four of the tumor types from each other and identified differentially expressed transcripts, which are characteristically up-regulated in CCSST. Statistical analysis revealed a group of 331 probe sets, representing approximately 300 significant (P < 0.001) differentially regulated genes, which clearly discriminated between the CCSST and other tumor samples. Besides genes that were already known to be highly expressed in CCSST, like S100A11 (S100 protein) or MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor), this group shows an obvious portion of genes that are involved in cyclic AMP response or regulation, in pigmentation processes, or in neuronal structure and signaling. Comparison with other expression profile analyses on neuroectodermal childhood tumors confirms the high robustness of this strategy to characterize tumor entities based on their gene expression. We found the avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homologue 3 (ERBB3) to be one of the most dramatically up-regulated genes in CCSST. Quantitative real-time PCR and Northern blot analysis verified the mRNA abundance and confirmed the absence of the inhibitory transcript variant of this gene. The protein product of the member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family ERBB3 could be shown to be highly present in all of the CCSST cell lines investigated, as well as in 18 of 20 primary tumor biopsies. In conclusion, our data demonstrate new aspects of the phenotype and the biological behavior of CCSST and reveal ERBB3 to be a useful diagnostic marker.

Blotting, Northern↗

Cytogenetic alterations and cytokeratin expression patterns in breast cancer: integrating a new model of breast differentiation into cytogenetic pathways of breast carcinogenesis.

The introduction of a concept proposing multiple cellular subgroups in the normal female breast, including cytokeratin 5/6 (Ck 5/6)-positive progenitor cells, offers a new explanation for the existence of highly aggressive breast cancers with and without Ck 5/6 expression. Using the tissue microarray technique, 166 breast cancer cases, all characterized by comparative genomic hybridization, were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, using 15 different antibodies (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, Ki-67, c-erbB2, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclins A, D1, and E, bcl-2, p21, p27, Ck 5/6, Ck 8/18, and smooth muscle actin) and chromogenic in situ hybridization for c-erbB2. Biomathematical cluster analysis was applied to confirm the conventional interpretation of the results by an independent approach. Ck 5/6-positive breast carcinomas were in general negative for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, were highly proliferating (as reflected by Ki67 and cyclin A), and were associated with specific protein expression patterns, such as expression of p53 and epithelial growth factor receptor (all related to more aggressive tumor behavior), which could further be demonstrated by biomathematical cluster analysis. In contrast Ck 5/6-negative breast carcinomas revealed a lower tumor proliferation rate, an increased expression of p21, p27, c-erbB2, and bcl-2, and a significantly lower number of genetic alterations, with losses of chromosomal material of 16q as the most common genetic alteration. Our data give the first hints to the hypothesis that different cellular subgroups in the female breast give rise to subgroups of breast carcinomas with differing protein expression and cytogenetic alteration patterns that may be related to clinical behavior.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Expression analysis of pediatric solid tumor cell lines using oligonucleotide microarrays.

We identified patterns of differentially-expressed genes in cell lines derived from several pediatric solid tumors. Affymetrix Human Cancer G110 Arrays, carrying 1,700 cancer-associated genes, were applied to a panel of 11 cell lines originating from Ewing tumors (ETs), neuroblastomas, and malignant melanoma of soft parts. Hierarchical clustering clearly differentiated these 3 entities and revealed groups of 75, 102, and 36 gene probe-sets exhibiting tumor-type specific up-regulation in these cell lines, respectively. Whereas ET lines demonstrated increased expression of microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 1A (PPP1R1A), NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related kinase 2 (NEK2), and cyclin D1 (CCND1), neuroblastoma samples exhibited high expression of wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family member 11 (WNT11), Drosophila frizzled homolog 2 (FZD2), and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) which are involved in regulating free beta-catenin levels. These genes likely maintain tumor-specific characteristics and participate in key downstream regulatory mechanisms. We also correlated the expression levels of up-regulated genes in ETs with their chromosomal localization and compared these data to the comparative genomic hybridization profiles of the cell lines. We demonstrate that gains of genetic material contribute essentially to differential gene expression.

Child↗

Characterization of the malignant melanoma of soft-parts cell line GG-62 by expression analysis using DNA microarrays.

GG-62 is a cell line previously thought to be derived from an atypical Ewing tumor (ET). Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction revealed an in-frame fusion between the Ewing sarcoma gene ( EWS) codon 325 and the activating transcription factor 1 gene ( ATF1) codon 65 which permits the production of chimeric EWS-ATF1 oncoproteins. We also identified the genomic breakpoint resulting from a reciprocal t(12;22)(q13;q12), which is the hallmark of malignant melanoma of soft parts (MMSP). We applied Affymetrix human cancer G110 arrays to compare the gene expression patterns of GG-62 and other cell lines derived from small blue round cell tumors of childhood. Hierarchical clustering of 463 differentially expressed genes distinguished GG-62 from the ETs, as well as the neuroblastomas, and revealed a cluster of 36 upregulated genes. Several of these genes are involved in signal transduction pathways that may be critical for maintaining cell transformation; some examples are avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 3 ( ERBB3), neuregulin 1 ( NRG1), fibroblast growth factor 9 ( FGF9), and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 ( FGFR1). Furthermore, genes near the chromosome-12q13 breakpoint exhibited increased expression of GG-62 including ERBB3, NR4A1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1), cyclin-dependent kinase 2 ( CDK2), and alpha 5 integrin ( ITGA5). Altogether our findings demonstrate the MMSP derivation of GG-62 and may shed light on the mechanisms of tumorigenesis in this rare disease.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗