PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Edit Dulka

Publications and source records attributed to Edit Dulka.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

[Our experience using autofluorescence bronchoscopy].

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is responsible for most cancer deaths in the world. The main reason for the poor prognosis is late diagnosis. Many patients could be successfully treated in early stage. AIMS: The authors performed 369 bronchological examination on 336 patients using autofluorescence bronchoscopy between 1998 and 2003 to detect preinvasive lesions and early forms of lung cancer. METHODS: Storz D-Light autofluorescence system has been used to perform the examinations. RESULTS: In one third of these patients invasive lung cancer developed during follow-up. Combining traditional white light and autofluorescence technique 50% more intraepithelial lesions have been observed and sensitivity has been increased by 69% compared to the lone use of white light bronchoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by most international studies these results emphasise that autofluorescence bronchoscopy has a major role in the early diagnosis of preinvasive bronchial lesions and may help in the prevention and early therapy of lung cancer.

Bronchial Neoplasms↗

[Bronchoscopic specimen collection, role of the protected specimen brush in lower respiratory tract infections].

INTRODUCTION: The ineffectiveness of microbiological methods in the lower respiratory tract infections are caused by anachronistic sampling methods. Authors checked the protected specimen brush effectiveness and those of the influencing factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 103 patients were involved in the study. The causative agents were identified in 44 cases. These results were compared to last year's classic sampling techniques and they experienced 20.4% improvement of the sensitivity. Further increasing in effectiveness can be reached if we perform bacteriological sampling after the first unsuccessful antibiotic treatment was performed. Out of 103 examined patients only 69 underwent antibiotic treatment. In the case of 13 patients after the course of one type antibiotic treatment 10 positive bacteriological cultures were positive. In the case of 31 patients 2 types of antibiotics were administered sequentially and examined afterwards and the authors found 15 positive bacteriological cultures. In the case of 25 patients the administered sequentially 3 times of antibiotics and examined afterwards, 6 cultures were positive. CONCLUSION: The examinations prove that the protected specimen brush, used in time, raises the sensitivity of microbiological processes.

Adult↗