Letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years on tamoxifen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Comment↗
Biomedical subjects
Edith A Perez
Publications and source records attributed to Edith A Perez.
Cardiac issues related to trastuzumab.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Phase II study of oral etoposide and intravenous paclitaxel in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the activity and tolerance for the combination of oral etoposide and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with extensive SCLC. METHODS: A total of 57 patients were enrolled in this study. A cycle of chemotherapy consisted of oral etoposide administered as 50 mg BID on days 1 through 10 and paclitaxel administered as 150 mg/m(2) IV (3 h infusion) along with the first dose of etoposide on day 10. Patients were assessed for response to therapy (regression, stable disease, progression), survival, time to disease progression, and toxicity. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy parameters. Among the 55 patients, there were six with complete regression of disease, 18 with partial regression, 11 with regression, five with stable disease, and 15 with progressive disease, yielding an overall response rate of 63.6% (95% confidence interval, 50.0-76.0%). The 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival rates were 48.2 and 18.9%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.8 months. The overall survival rates were 67.3% at 6 months and 41.8% at 1 year. The combination of oral etoposide and paclitaxel demonstrated significant efficacy as first-line therapy for extensive SCLC, with an overall response rate of 63.6% for 55 evaluable patients. In addition, the treatment was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.
Administration, Oral↗
Utilizing Nottingham Prognostic Index in microarray gene expression profiling of breast carcinomas.
We report a novel approach to gene expression profiling using the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) to stratify 26 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. As an aggregate index of parameters reflecting metastatic potential, growth rate, and genetic instability the NPI has distinct advantages over other clinicopathologic features used to segregate breast cancer patients. As a continuous variable it offers a responsive and sensitive means of modeling a continuum of clinical aggressiveness. Using RNA extracted from 26 tumors and cDNA microarrays with 23 343 unique genetic elements, 84 genes and expressed sequence tags were identified whose expression patterns correlated with NPI. Differential expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also observed for two of three genes evaluated by this method. Correlation was determined by the Spearman rank correlation method with null distribution analysis. Among the 84 genetic elements were seven previously implicated in neoplastic progression (including the two demonstrating differential expression by IHC), 11 without specific cancer association but localized to chromosomal sites whose loss or gain has been identified in cytogenetic studies of breast carcinoma, and 73 not previously associated with breast carcinoma. Collectively, the expression patterns of these 84 elements have potential to distinguish high and low NPI patient samples. These data add support to the assertion that prognostic groups of breast carcinoma are reflected in distinguishable expression profiles of a limited set of genes.
Adult↗
Improving patient care through molecular diagnostics.
Traditional cancer diagnostic techniques include assessment of histologic appearance, identification of specific tumor subtypes, tumor grading, assessment of lymph node status, and presence of metastasis. These are useful for initial evaluation, but are limited in their ability to predict response to treatment and/or risk of experiencing adverse events to particular treatments. Recently, there has been considerable progress in molecular diagnostics in this area. Using molecular-based technologies, it is now possible to identify some patients with an inherited risk of developing breast cancer, and to more accurately assess the prognosis of those who already have developed the disease. Various techniques are also available or under investigation to help select patients who are most likely to respond to certain types of treatment. At present, this includes diagnostic tests to identify single tumor markers for which specific therapies are available, such as estrogen receptor and HER2. Diagnostic systems that allow simultaneous assessment of multiple markers, such as DNA microarrays and proteomics, are currently being validated. The use of these systems will allow further development of customized therapies directed toward the particular molecular defects in a given cancer.
Biomarkers, Tumor↗
Future options with trastuzumab for primary systemic and adjuvant therapy.
HER2 positivity can be detected early in breast cancer development and is associated with a poor outcome. Primary systemic therapy with trastuzumab (Herceptin; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in combination with taxanes and other cytotoxic agents has been studied in phase II clinical trials in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. These combinations have achieved pathologic complete response rates of 12% to 42% and clinical complete response rates of 30% to 67%. These results compare favorably with those of primary systemic therapy using standard combinations in patients with unselected (HER2-positive or -negative) breast cancer. Consequently, larger studies are in progress in which trastuzumab is administered before surgery in combination with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab is continued as monotherapy afterward to complete 1 year of treatment or until disease progression. These studies aim to provide further proof of the clinical benefits associated with trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy. They will also investigate the molecular determinants of sensitivity and resistance. In addition, four major randomized trials, in more than 13,500 patients, are investigating the impact of adding trastuzumab to standard adjuvant therapy. Planned interim cardiac safety analyses have been passed without concerns. Recruitment to these studies has either recently been completed or continues as planned. Together, this extensive program, which includes analysis of predictive molecular and pathologic makers, will establish the efficacy, safety, and role of trastuzumab in early breast cancer.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Carboplatin in combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-based regimens have a limited role in patients with metastatic breast cancer due to cumulative cardiotoxicity and their common use in adjuvant chemotherapy. New nonanthracycline regimens are, therefore, needed for metastatic disease. Single-agent carboplatin is active in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer, producing response rates of 20%-35%. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic antitumor efficacy of carboplatin and trastuzumab in HER2(+) models. METHODS: Phase II and III clinical trial data of combination therapy with carboplatin (Paraplatin; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Princeton, NJ), a taxane, and/or trastuzumab (Herceptin; Genentech, Inc.; South San Francisco, CA) in metastatic breast cancer were identified from multiple sources, including: A) clinical trial data published in peer-reviewed journals within the last 5 years; B) preliminary clinical trial data from abstracts recently presented at national meetings; and C) phase III protocols currently evaluating carboplatin-based combination regimens. RESULTS: In several phase II studies, combination carboplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb) therapy was active and reasonably well tolerated in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, producing objective response rates of 53%-62%-substantially higher rates than those seen in other phase II trials of either drug alone. Similar phase II data for carboplatin with docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis; Bridgewater, NJ) have been reported, and recent phase III data suggest that adding carboplatin to a paclitaxel/trastuzumab regimen produces superior efficacy than paclitaxel/trastuzumab alone for patients with HER2(+) metastatic disease. Drug scheduling plays an important role in the therapeutic ratio of this combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of carboplatin as a standard agent in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer has support from several recent studies. Preliminary results of combination carboplatin/taxane therapy with trastuzumab in metastatic disease are encouraging, and other carboplatin combinations are also being investigated in other phase II and III trials in patients selected based on the HER2 status of their cancer. Results are eagerly awaited.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Management recommendations for adjuvant systemic breast cancer therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Gemcitabine and platinum combinations in patients with breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes.
As anthracycline-based regimens have become a standard treatment and are frequently used in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer, the number of anthracycline-resistant cancers has begun to increase. Taxanes have also become more commonly used in the first-line metastatic and adjuvant setting, producing a need for new treatment options that are not cross-resistant with anthracyclines or taxanes and that have a relative non-overlapping toxicity profile with these agents. The combination of gemcitabine/cisplatin has been shown to have synergistic cytotoxic activity in vitro in breast cancer cell lines. In addition, several phase II trials have suggested that this combination is feasible and active in patients who have received prior anthracycline and/or taxane therapy.
Anthracyclines↗
Advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the United States; this year, approximately 215,900 new cases will be diagnosed. Mammography remains the cornerstone of screening, with technologies such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging having an increasingly defined role. Improved risk assessment and prevention strategies have been implemented, and current research in these areas includes better identification of patients at risk, the use of aromatase inhibitors and other agents to reduce risk, and the use of surrogate markers. Breast cancer staging has been optimized recently; also, local management of breast cancer, adjuvant systemic therapies, and treatment of patients with advanced disease have been evolving. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer continue to influence our approach to patients with this disease. Many improvements have been made as well in supportive care, including increased tolerability of therapy and notable amelioration of disease symptoms.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Anthracycline vs nonanthracycline adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
The treatment of breast cancer has progressed substantially over the past 15 years. Data from randomized adjuvant trials have shown that the risk of disease recurrence and death is significantly reduced when adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy is added to treatment. As new strategies are incorporated, one of the continued controversies in patient management is whether adjuvant anthracyclines should be the preferred treatment for all patients. Data from randomized and translational clinical trials have become available and are helping to elucidate the proper role of anthracyclines, as well as their acute and long-term toxicities. In most situations, an anthracycline is currently preferred, but other single and combination chemotherapies are currently under evaluation and appear promising for use in the adjuvant setting. Continued breast cancer research using molecular markers (such as topoisomerase II-alpha and gene clusters) as predictors of treatment response, could help individualize decisions regarding whether to incorporate anthracyclines into adjuvant therapy regimens.
Anthracyclines↗
A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: In hormone-dependent breast cancer, five years of postoperative tamoxifen therapy--but not tamoxifen therapy of longer duration--prolongs disease-free and overall survival. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole, by suppressing estrogen production, might improve the outcome after the discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of five years of letrozole therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer who have completed five years of tamoxifen therapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 5187 women were enrolled (median follow-up, 2.4 years). At the first interim analysis, there were 207 local or metastatic recurrences of breast cancer or new primary cancers in the contralateral breast--75 in the letrozole group and 132 in the placebo group--with estimated four-year disease-free survival rates of 93 percent and 87 percent, respectively, in the two groups (P< or =0.001 for the comparison of disease-free survival). A total of 42 women in the placebo group and 31 women in the letrozole group died (P=0.25 for the comparison of overall survival). Low-grade hot flashes, arthritis, arthralgia, and myalgia were more frequent in the letrozole group, but vaginal bleeding was less frequent. There were new diagnoses of osteoporosis in 5.8 percent of the women in the letrozole group and 4.5 percent of the women in the placebo group (P=0.07); the rates of fracture were similar. After the first interim analysis, the independent data and safety monitoring committee recommended termination of the trial and prompt communication of the results to the participants. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, letrozole therapy after the completion of standard tamoxifen treatment significantly improves disease-free survival.
Adult↗
Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.
PURPOSE: Using a 2 x 2 factorial design, we studied the adjuvant chemotherapy of women with axillary node-positive breast cancer to compare sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T), and cyclophosphamide (C) with concurrent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) for disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS); to determine whether the dose density of the agents improves DFS and OS; and to compare toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,005 female patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following regimens: (I) sequential A x 4 (doses) --> T x 4 --> C x 4 with doses every 3 weeks, (II) sequential A x 4 --> T x 4 --> C x 4 every 2 weeks with filgrastim, (III) concurrent AC x 4 --> T x 4 every 3 weeks, or (IV) concurrent AC x 4 --> T x 4 every 2 weeks with filgrastim. RESULTS: A protocol-specified analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 36 months: 315 patients had experienced relapse or died, compared with 515 expected treatment failures. Dose-dense treatment improved the primary end point, DFS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74; P =.010), and OS (RR = 0.69; P =.013). Four-year DFS was 82% for the dose-dense regimens and 75% for the others. There was no difference in either DFS or OS between the concurrent and sequential schedules. There was no interaction between density and sequence. Severe neutropenia was less frequent in patients who received the dose-dense regimens. CONCLUSION: Dose density improves clinical outcomes significantly, despite the lower than expected number of events at this time. Sequential chemotherapy is as effective as concurrent chemotherapy.
Adult↗
Adjuvant therapy approaches to breast cancer: should taxanes be incorporated?
The triplet of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has emerged as an alternative chemotherapy regimen for adjuvant management of node-positive breast cancer. Based on recently reported 3-year data from the Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) 001, disease-free survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with TAC rather than the established regimen of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). TAC reduced the risk of disease recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive and -negative patients. Whereas overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups, TAC led to a significant reduction in mortality in the subset of patients with one to three involved axillary lymph nodes. Overall, these interim BCIRG 001 results, coupled with those from Cancer and Leukemia Group B-9344 and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-28 (phase III trials of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel), suggest that taxanes are a valuable component of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer, including those with estrogen receptor positivity and/or extensive lymph node involvement. Accumulating data in the neoadjuvant setting lend further support to the view that the taxanes confer clinically meaningful benefits in the management of early-stage breast cancer. Such ongoing studies as NSABP B-30 will be instrumental in establishing the relative merits of sequential versus concurrent taxane-anthracycline adjuvant regimens for patients with node-positive breast cancer.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Recent advances in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To review recent studies that may influence the adjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. Studies reviewed evaluate the role of aromatase inhibitors, incorporation of taxanes into chemotherapy regimens, novel dosage schedules, and supportive care with epoetin alfa. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and clinical experience. CONCLUSION: Recent evidence suggests that aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen as hormonal adjuvant therapy and that the addition of taxanes to adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcome. Supportive care is also an important component of therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Knowledge of recent advances in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer will contribute to greater efficacy in patient care.
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
Phase I trial of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin in patients with lung cancer and other advanced malignancies.
BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has been reported to enhance the antitumor activity of cisplatin in preclinical models by modulation of protein kinase C signal transduction and apoptosis-related pathways. METHODS: We conducted a phase I study of high-dose oral tamoxifen in combination with intravenous cisplatin, with two objectives: 1) to determine tolerability, and 2) to determine the daily tamoxifen dose required to achieve serum levels equivalent to in vitro concentrations reported to enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity in preclinical models. Tamoxifen was administered days one through seven at escalating daily doses of 160 mg/m2 (n = 5), 200 mg/m2 (n = 6), and 250 mg/m2 (n = 4) by patient cohort, followed by cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on day eight. Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and its hydroxylated metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on day eight of the first treatment cycle in seven patients. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with advanced malignancies received treatment with tamoxifen at 160 mg/m2, 200 mg/m2, and 250 mg/m2 per cycle, respectively. Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen on day eight of the first cycle ranged from 1.75-8.22 microM (mean 4.72 microM) and 3.62-10.85 microM (mean 3.87 microM), respectively. Toxicity analysis demonstrated that grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicity occurred in 0/5 at a tamoxifen dose of 160 mg/m2, 1/6 at a tamoxifen dose of 200 mg/m2, and in 1/4 patients at the 250 mg/m2 dose level. No grade 4 hematological toxicity occurred. Classic dose-limiting toxicity was not observed; the trial was closed to further accrual after documentation that targeted tamoxifen levels (around 5 microM) were achieved with daily tamoxifen doses > or = 160 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin can be safely administered. Serum tamoxifen levels comparable to concentrations required for enhancement of cisplatin sensitivity in vitro are clinically achievable with acceptable toxicity. The level of antitumor activity in nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC is encouraging (partial response in 4/10 patients). Based on these data, a Phase II study of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin in patients with metastatic NSCLC is being conducted through the Southwest Oncology Group.
Adult↗
Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patients (>or=65 years of age): a phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.
The purpose of this study was to determine the tumor response rate and toxicity profile of low-dose weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients 65 or more years of age. Forty-nine patients 65 years of age or more with advanced non-SCLC with a median age of 73 years (range: 65-85) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2 in 31%, 47%, and 22% of patients, respectively, were treated and evaluated. Patients received carboplatin (AUC = 2) and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The overall confirmed tumor response rate was 14% (95% CI: 4.7%, 32.5%) with no complete responses. The 1-year survival rate was 31% (95% CI: 20%, 48%). There was one treatment-related death, and there were two grade IV allergic reactions to chemotherapy. No other grade IV or V treatment-related toxicities were observed. There were only three episodes of grade III myelosuppression. Low-dose weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel, as prescribed in this trial, provides modest activity in the treatment of advanced non-SCLC patients 65 or more years of age. However, the relatively mild toxicity profile observed in this trial suggests that this regimen might remain an option for patients at increased risk for myelosuppression or with a poor performance status.
Aged↗
Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831.
The efficacy of trastuzumab for metastases coupled with the relatively poor prognosis of patients with node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer has led to the evaluation of trastuzumab as an adjuvant therapy. A prospective, randomized, three-arm, phase III trial is being conducted by the Breast Intergroup (N9831) for women with primary, operable, histologically confirmed, node-positive breast carcinoma that strongly overexpresses (3+) HER2 protein and/or displays HER2/neu gene amplification, as determined by local laboratory testing. The protocol requires confirmatory central testing of HER2 status using the HercepTest immunohistochemistry and the Vysis PathVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. Tumor specimens from the first 119 patients enrolled in N9831 were centrally tested; 74% were found to be HercepTest 3+ and 66% were found to have HER2 gene amplification. Only six of nine (67%) of the specimens submitted by local laboratories as FISH positive could be confirmed by central assays. The concordance for central HercepTest and central FISH assays was 92%. The poor concordance (74%) between local and central testing for HER2 status has led to modifications in the eligibility criteria for N9831.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗