Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Edmondo Terzoli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine infusion at the fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2) per minute (FDR-gemcitabine) has pharmacokinetic advantages and may result in improved therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Between April 2002 and September 2003, 40 patients with advanced-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC; n = 27) or biliary tree carcinoma (BTC; n = 13) were treated with weekly FDR-gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). The primary end point was the response rate. The secondary end points were progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor marker response, and clinical benefit response (CBR). RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) on an intent-to-treat basis was 15% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4-26%). A positive CBR was obtained in 14 of 29 (48%) patients. Seventeen of 25 (68%) patients had a reduction in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) of > 25%. The median time to treatment failure and the median PFS were 17 weeks (95% CI, 13-22 weeks) and 19 weeks (95% CI, 15-23 weeks), respectively. The median OS was 40 weeks (95% CI, 36-45 weeks) and the 1-year actuarial survival rate was 25.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that a performance status score of 0-1 at study entry and locally advanced disease were the only independent predictors of longer PFS and OS, whereas a reduction in CA 19-9 serum levels > 75% was an independent predictor of longer PFS, but had no impact on OS. Toxicity was mild with Grade 3-4 neutropenia (according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) in 18 of 427 treatment weeks (4.2%), and Grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in 6 of 427 treatment weeks (1.4%) and 9 of 427 treatment weeks (2.1%), respectively, and asymptomatic Grade 3-4 transaminase elevation in 21 of 427 treatment weeks (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: FDR-gemcitabine at the weekly dose of 1000 mg/m(2) demonstrated promising activity, despite negligible toxicity, in patients with advanced-stage PDAC and BTC.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of varying intensity schedules of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) support in preventing febrile neutropenia in early breast cancer patients treated with relatively high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 stage I and II breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a factorial 2 x 2 design, epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles +/- lonidamine +/- G-CSF. The following five consecutive G-CSF schedules were tested every 100 randomly assigned patients: (1) 480 microg/d subcutaneously days 8 to 14; (2) 480 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; (3) 300 microg/d days 8 to 14; (4) 300 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 microg/d days 8 and 12. RESULTS: All of the G-CSF schedules covered the neutrophil nadir time. Schedule 5 was equivalent to the daily schedules (schedules 1 and 3) and to the alternate day schedules (schedules 2 and 4) with respect to incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .79 and P = .89, respectively), rate of fever episodes (P = .84 and P = .77, respectively), incidence of neutropenic fever (P = .74 and P = .56, respectively), need of antibiotics (P = .77 and P = .88, respectively), and percentage of delayed cycles (P = .43 and P = .42, respectively). G-CSF had no significant impact on the delivered dose-intensity compared with the non-G-CSF arms. CONCLUSION: In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of weekly docetaxel administration in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: In phase I, cohorts of 3 women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer were treated with a 1-hour infusion of docetaxelat 30, 35, 40 mg/m2/week after premedication with two doses of dexamethazone 8 mg 12 h apart. Subsequently, a cohort of 28 women was treated at the MTD for 24 consecutive weeks in a phase II setting and was assessed for toxicity and activity. RESULTS: Three patients were treated at each of the first two dose levels; 9 patients were treated at the 3rd level (40 mg/m2/week). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced at that level by 2/6 patients of the first two accrued groups and in 2/3 patients of the 3rd (confirmation) group, thus establishing the subsequent phase II dose at 35 mg/m2/week. Two out of 28 evaluable patients (7.1%, 95% CI 0-16.7) showed complete responses, whereas 8 (28.6%, 95% CI 11.8-45.3) showed partial responses, and an objective response rate of 35.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 18-53.5%). In addition, 8 patients (28.6%) had stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival were 5 (range 1-15) and 15 months (95% CI 7-23), respectively. One patient experienced 1 episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Severe asthenia was the main reason for interruption of chemotherapy (10 patients, 35.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the sustained weekly administration of docetaxel, even though it demonstrated an activity similar to a 3-weekly schedule could not be maintained for the planned 24 weeks due to the progressive emergence of nonhematological side effects that approached DLTs.
BACKGROUND: The magnitude of the benefit of adding taxanes to anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma is still unclear. The authors performed a pooled analysis as well as a meta-analysis of all Phase III trials, to determine whether the combination of anthracyclines plus taxanes provided an advantage over standard anthracyclines-based regimens. METHODS: All Phase III peer-reviewed published or presented trials were considered eligible. A pooled analysis (Method A) and a literature-based meta-analysis (Method B) were accomplished, and event-based relative risk ratios (RR(A-B)) with 95% confidence intervals were derived. Both analyses were performed to examine for significant differences in time to disease progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response rate (CR), neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia (FN). For both analyses, a heterogeneity test was applied. RESULTS: Seven trials (2805 patients) were gathered. When data were pooled and plotted, significant differences in favor of taxanes were seen for ORR (RR(A-B) 1.21, P<0.001), CR (RR(A) 2.04; RR(B) 1.81, P<0.001), even though they caused a significant increase in neutropenia (RR(A) 1.19; RR(B) 1.15, P<0.001) and FN (RR(A) 2.82; RR(B) 3.44, P<0.001). A borderline significance in favor of taxanes was seen in TTP (RR(A) 1.10, P=0.05; RR(B) 1.06, P=0.07). A nonsignificant trend for taxanes was found in OS. No significant heterogeneity (except for neutropenia, P<0.01) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The adjunction of taxanes to anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma yielded a significant benefit in activity (ORR, CR), a slight advantage in TTP, and a trend in OS, although with a significant cost in hematologic toxicity.
The management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents presents many unresolved issues. We reviewed the literature relating to epoetin alfa (Eprex)/Epypo); Ortho Biotech/Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, http://www.orthobiotech.co.uk; Procrit); Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.orthobiotech.com), epoetin beta (NeoRecormon); Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com), and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp); Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, http://www.amgen.com) highlighting the results of published clinical trials, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Studies were identified through MEDLINE and the bibliographies of relevant articles. Epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin alfa have differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. They are all effective at reducing transfusion requirements and improving health-related quality-of-life parameters, irrespective of tumor response. A direct comparison between epoetin alfa and darbe poetin alfa is based on limited evidence, which does not allow definitive conclusions about relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness. No predictive factors for response to erythropoietic agents have been validated in prospective trials. The most consistent adverse events are thrombotic and may occur irrespective of an increase in hemoglobin. Recent research indicates that the erythropoietin receptor is expressed in several cancer cell lines, raising the concern of possible stimulation of tumor cell growth by these drugs. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietins, particularly compared with transfusion therapy, have been challenging to conduct and analyze and have generated ambiguous results. The use of erythropoietins needs to be optimized in terms of cost-effectiveness, and issues surrounding safety need to be clarified. A stronger methodology for clinical studies and the design of new, randomized, clinical trials is a major priority.
BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is up-regulated frequently and may constitute a promising therapeutic target in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Patients with advanced PDAC who had progressive disease after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were eligible for this pilot study. Treatment was comprised of oral celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) and protracted intravenous (i.v.) infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (200 mg/m(2) per day), both given continuously for a maximum of 9 treatment months, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were examined weekly for toxicity and were restaged every 6-8 weeks for tumor assessment. RESULTS: Seventeen patients entered the study. Asymptomatic transaminase elevation was the most common toxicity and reached NCI-CTC (version 3.0) Grade 3-4 in 4 of 133 treatment weeks. No other hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity > Grade 2 was observed. Four patients discontinued celecoxib due to upper gastrointestinal tract toxicity. Two confirmed partial responses (durations of 23 weeks and 68 weeks, respectively) and 2 patients with stable disease (durations of 10 weeks and 13 weeks, respectively) were observed for an overall response rate of 12% (95% confidence interval, 0-27%) in the intent-to-treat population. A significant decrease (> or = 50%) in serum CA 19.9 levels was observed in 3 of 9 evaluable patients. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks, and the median overall survival was 15 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral celecoxib and 5-FU by protracted i.v. infusion was found to be feasible and well tolerated, and was capable of inducing durable objective responses, even in patients with far advanced, gemcitabine-resistant/refractory PDAC. Further exploration of COX-2 inhibitor/fluropyrimidine combinations is warranted.
PURPOSE: The best way to deliver infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) has yet to be determined. The aim of this prospective phase II trial was to verify the tolerability, activity and efficacy of chronomodulated 5-FU-FA (FF(5-16)) every 3 weeks in 48 untreated patients (group A), and 28 pretreated and four non-measurable, advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients (group B). METHODS: The sinusoidal delivery of both drugs started at 10.00 p.m. and ended at 10.00 a.m., with peak flow at 4.00 a.m. for 5 consecutive days. The initial 5-FU dose was 900 mg/m(2)/day with intra-patient dose increase at 1,000 and 1,100 mg/m(2)/day, at the second and third course, respectively; FA was injected at a fixed dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day (Garufi et al.1997). RESULTS: Neither death from toxicity nor hematological toxicities were encountered. Maximal toxicity consisted of Grade 3 oral mucositis in 41% of patients, in only 8% of 535 courses. It was possible to achieve objective responses in 31% of untreated patients, with a progression free survival (PFS) of 7 months, median survival of 14 months and a 2-year survival rate of 28%. Similar results for PFS and survival were obtained in pretreated patients as well. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that response was related to the occurrence of mucositis and diarrhea ( p=0.03 and p=0.0007) and to performance status (PS) ( p=0.01). Quality of life, measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30+3 questionnaire, was unaffected by treatment and was better in patients with good PS and responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In this chronomodulated FF(5-16) phase II study, the probability of obtaining a relevant tumor reduction was significantly correlated with a patient variable such as PS, and toxicity variables such as mucositis and diarrhea. This observation and the validation of predictive factors for QoL deserve further investigation in ACC patients.
BACKGROUND: Although fatigue is one of the most common complaints of patients with cancer, it went unrecognized or overlooked for many years, until clinicians achieved better control over the more acute symptoms of nausea, emesis, and pain. A number of treatment-related and disease-related factors may contribute to the development of fatigue, but its physiologic basis remains poorly understood, and many proposed interventions have not been studied systematically. The lack of a standard of care for the assessment or treatment of fatigue in patients with cancer has limited research in this field. A critical appraisal of these issues is presented in this review. METHODS: The published literature was reviewed for definition, prevalence, causes, and means of managing cancer-related fatigue (CRF). RESULTS: Fatigue was reportedly present at the time of diagnosis in approximately 50-75% of cancer patients. The prevalence of CRF increased to 80-96% in patients undergoing chemotherapy and to 60-93% in patients receiving radiotherapy. Two tested interventions that showed consistent effects to alleviate CRF were treatment of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietin agents (recombinant human erythropoietin and darbepotin alpha) and aerobic exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Several lines of research are needed to bridge the specific gaps in the current knowledge of CRF. These involve the pathophysiology of the symptom, the validation of diagnostic criteria, and specific therapeutic interventions. Current practice guidelines are based on a combination of research and expert clinical judgment and should be used to guide care with the expectation that they will evolve to incorporate the results of studies currently underway.
PURPOSE: Lonidamine (LND) can enhance the activity of anthracyclines in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was designed to determine whether the association of LND with high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC) could improve disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with early breast cancer (BC) compared with EC alone. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was added to maintain the EC dose-intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 patients with stage I/II BC were randomly assigned to four groups: (A) epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for four cycles (124 patients); (B) EC plus LND 450 mg/d administered orally (125 patients); (C) EC plus G-CSF administered subcutaneously (129 patients); (D) EC plus LND plus G-CSF (128 patients). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 55 months. Five-year DFS rate was similar for LND (B+D groups; 69.6%) versus non-LND arms (A+C groups; 70.3%) and G-CSF (C+D groups; 67.2%) versus non-G-CSF arms (A+B groups; 72.9%). Five-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in LND (79.1%) versus non-LND arms (81.3%) and in G-CSF (80.6%) versus non-G-CSF arms (79.6%). DFS and OS distributions in LND and G-CSF arms did not change according to tumor size, node, receptor, and menopausal status. G-CSF dramatically reduced hematologic toxicity without having a significant impact on dose-intensity (98.1% v 95.5% for C+D and A+B groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: EC is active and well tolerated in patients with early breast cancer. The addition of LND or G-CSF does not improve DFS or OS.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In vitro studies suggest that all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) synergizes with erythropoietin (EPO) for the stimulation of hematopoiesis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A clinical trial was performed to evaluate whether a combination of these agents was effective in relieving the cytopenias associated with MDS. Twenty-seven patients with low- or intermediate-risk MDS were enrolled in a 12-week study. ATRA was administered orally at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day in 2 divided doses for 7 consecutive days every other week. Recombinant human EPO was given subcutaneously 3 times a week. The EPO dose was initiated at 150 U/kg and was increased to 300 U/kg if after 6 weeks there was no or there was suboptimal erythroid response. Patients who responded to therapy were continued on ATRA and EPO at the same doses for 6 additional months (extension phase). Further treatment was given to patients with a continued response. Clinically significant erythroid responses with increases of hemoglobin levels of at least 1 g/dL or reduction of transfusion needs were seen in 13 (48%) patients, with 4 showing improved responses after dose escalation of EPO. Ten (37%) patients displayed continued responses during 6 months of extended treatment, and 7 (26%) are still responsive after a follow-up period of 13 months. Neutrophil responses were observed in 5 of 12 patients with neutropenia, and platelet responses were observed in 6 of 9 patients with thrombocytopenia. Three patients displayed trilineage responses that were sustained during continuation therapy. Side effects were observed in all patients but were of mild entity and did not require discontinuation of therapy. It is concluded that the combination ATRA + EPO is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk MDS. The optimal ATRA and EPO schedule and the role of maintenance treatment remain to be determined and warrant further investigation.
Cancer patients frequently experience anemia as a complication of chemotherapy. Recent advances in assessing the relationships between anemia, fatigue and quality of life (QOL) in such patients have resulted in a new multidimensional perspective of these parameters. Clinical data suggest that even a mild-to-moderate chemotherapy-induced anemia results in a significant reduction in a patient's energy level and QOL. As recombinant human erythropoetin has recently become available for the treatment of this condition, we performed a review of the incidence and severity of anemia associated with commonly employed chemotherapy regimens in the major non-hematologic malignancies. Although evident flaws in the grading and reporting of treatment-related anemia have limited analysis, the results clearly indicate a relatively high incidence of mild-to-moderate anemia. Research in progress is likely to result in a new classification of chemotherapy-induced anemia that can guide therapeutic interventions on the basis of outcomes and hemoglobin levels. The once widespread belief that lesser degrees of anemia must be endured without treatment may be overcome as greater emphasis is placed on the QOL of the oncology patient. Further insights into the relationships between hemoglobin levels, patient well-being and symptoms may lead to a refinement of current strategies of approaching the treatment of anemia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: To assess the activity and toxicity of primary chemotherapy with epirubicin (60 mg/m2 every other week) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, weekly) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 12 weeks, in patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a multicenter setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIA or IIIB breast cancer, not older than 70, were eligible. A two-stage phase II design was applied. Response was assessed clinically, instrumentally and pathologically. RESULTS: Out of 48 enrolled patients, 87.5% received all planned cycles, with a median dose-intensity of 30 mg/m2/week for epirubicin and 23.8 mg/m2/week for vinorelbine. A clinical or instrumental objective response was reached in 42 patients (87.5%, exact 95% CI: 74.7-95.3); significant downstaging was reached in all but one patient; 6 cases had a pathological complete response in the breast, and 2 cases in the lymph nodes too (pathological complete response rate 4.2%, exact 95% CI: 0.5-14.2); a further 2 patients had only microscopic cancer foci at pathological examination of the breast. Radiological tests underestimated the treatment effect on the breast. Toxicity was mild, neutropenia being the most frequent (grade 3-4 in 47% of patients), but never complicated with fever or sepsis. Mild constipation (< or =grade 2) occurred in 35% of patients. Moderate to severe asthenia occurred in 12% of 6 patients. No cardiac toxicity was reported. At 3 years, disease-free survival was 68% and overall survival 81%. CONCLUSION: Primary chemotherapy with epirubicin every other week, weekly vinorelbine and G-CSF support is highly active and well tolerated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.