PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eduardo Chuquiure Valenzuela

Publications and source records attributed to Eduardo Chuquiure Valenzuela.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

[Heart failure in acute myocardial infarction].

Heart failure during the immediate period of an acute myocardial infarction constitutes a major insult to this pathology; since, once installed, it is associate to ventricular dysfunction and expansion of the left ventricle. It can appear either early or delayed. Subsequent to the acute insult, the myocardium is subjected to diverse changes in its anatomical conformation and to diastolic and systolic alterations, which will affect the hemodynamic constants of the patient. Changes in the parietal ventricular architecture as well as at the neurohumoral level will also occur. The clinical signs of heart failure are: dyspnea, pallor, tachycardia, diaphoresis, cold skin, oliguria, somnolence, and gallop, which can be observed at the very beginning of the coronary occlusion. Its clinical identification, through in-hospital studies supported by adequate hemodynamic monitoring, is of utter relevance since it will lead to appropriate and fast treatment. The groups of patients with acute myocardial infarction with high risk for the development of cardiac failure are: patients with extensive Q wave infarction, diabetic, patients over 65 years of age, and those with a history of previous myocardial infarction(s). The cornerstone of treatment must be focused on reducing the myocardial ischemia, which can be achieved through the use of modern therapeutics and, given the case, pharmacological agents, coronary intervention procedures, or cardiac surgery must be taken into account. At present it is known that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, betablockers, inotropics, are useful to improve ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Heart Failure↗

[Decrease of total hemorrhage with reduced doses of enoxaparin in high risk unstable angina. ENHNFAI study. (Enoxaparin vs non-fractionated heparin in unstable angina). Preliminary report].

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized and controlled study, we compare complications in 2 groups of patients: group 1, enoxaparin 0.8 mg/kg, subcutaneous every 12 hours during 5 days, and group 2, intravenous unfractionated heparin during 5 days, by infusion treated to activate partial tromboplastin time 1.5-2 the upper limit of normal. Blood samples were obtained at 4, 12, 24 hours and at day 5 of treatment, to measure anti-Xa levels, and also, evaluated end points at 30 days, between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with clinical and angiographic variables between groups, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: 203 consecutive patients, average age of 60.5 +/- 11.2 years, and 80% men, were included. There were no differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. All patients with enoxaparin had therapeutic levels of anti-Xa, of 0.5 to 0.67 U/mL. There was increasing risk of total bleeding in group 2 (18.7%) than in group 1 (5.6%), with RR = 1.72 (95% CI 1.29, 2.29), p = .003. Also, there was 33.3% of MACE in group 2, and only 17.8% in group 1, with RR = 1.88 (CI 95% 1.29, 2.29), p = .011. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Low doses of enoxaparine achieve therapeutic levels, since the first 4 hours of treatment. 2) A significant reduction of total bleeding occurred with the low doses of enoxaparin, with the same efficacy to reduce MACE during follow-up.

Aged↗

[Evaluation of TIMI-4 flow at the coronary unit (INCICH)].

At present, the use of techniques that lead to assess coronary flow is determined by methods that include mostly coronary angiography, which is a fundamental tool in the evaluation of acute myocardial infarction carrier patients. The assessment of the myocardial flow permeability state, determined through TIMI-4 flow, allows to establish more precisely the impact of the used reperfusion treatment. The most common way of assessing it at the Coronary Unit is through contrast echocardiography using pharmacological agents with harmonic properties.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

["Cardiac power output" an old tool, possibly a modern tool for assessing cardiac pumping capability, as well as for a short-term prognosis in cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction].

Hemodynamic monitoring has been used extensively during the last decades for risk stratification and guiding treatment of patients with cardiovascular destabilization, especially in the scenario of acute heart failure and cardiac shock. Every cardiac pump has its own maximum performance, which denotes its pumping capability. The heart is a muscular mechanical pump with an ability to generate both flow (cardiac output) and pressure. The product of flow output and systemic arterial pressure is the rate of useful work done, "or the cardiac power" (CP). Cardiac pumping capability can be defined as the cardiac power output achieved by the heart during maximal stimulation, and cardiac reserve is the increase in power output as the cardiac performance is increased from the resting to the maximally stimulated state (CPR). Resting CP for a hemodynamically stable average sized adult is approximately 1 W. However, during stress or exercise, CPR can be recruited to increase the heart's pumping ability up to 6 W. In acute heart failure, the patient becomes hemodynamically unstable, and most of the cardiac pumping potential is recruited in order to sustain life. Hence, cardiac power measurements in patients with acute heart failure or with cardiogenic shock at rest represent most of the recruitable reserve available during the acute event, and their measurement reflects the severity of the patient's condition. It has been found that a cutoff value for CP of 0.53 W accurately predict in-hospital mortality for cardiogenic shock patients. Others investigators observed cutoff for increased mortality of CP < 1 W, data that were obtained at doses of maximal pharmacologic support yielding the individual maximal CP. In our experience, the cutoff value for CP that accurately predicts in-hospital mortality for cardiogenic shock patients is 0.7 W, but its impact on short-term prognosis is clearer if the patient achieves a CP equal or higher than 1 W after an optimal myocardial revascularization with interventional cardiac procedures. According to the data collected from the literature, CP deserves a place in the evaluation of the patient with cardiogenic shock due to an acute myocardial infarction, but a more profound analysis of this parameter an further evaluation are required in order to better understand its prognostic meaning in this acute cardiac syndrome.

Cardiac Output↗

[From the single vulnerable plaque, to the multiple complex coronary plaques. From their basis, to the modern therapeutic approach. A clinical reality in the spectrum of the acute coronary syndromes].

Contemporary clinical and laboratory data have challenged our classical concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes [ACS]. Indeed, several independent lines of clinical evidence have supported that the critical stenoses cause only a fraction of the ACS. Acute myocardial infarction is believed to be caused by rupture of a vulnerable coronary-artery plaque that appears as a single lesion on angiography. However, plaque instability might be caused by pathophysiologic processes, such as inflammation, that exert adverse effects throughout the coronary vasculature and therefore result in multiple unstable lesions. Recent studies have demonstrated that ruptured or vulnerable plaques exist not only at the culprit lesion but also in the whole coronary artery in some ACS patients. It has also been reported that a ruptured plaque at the culprit lesion is associated with elevated C- reactive protein and other inflammatory markers, which indeed indicate a poor prognosis in patients with ACS. Also, multiple plaque rupture is associated with systemic inflammation, and patients with multiple plaque rupture can be expected to show a poor prognosis. Therefore some ACS patients [20-40%] may harbor multiple complex coronary plaques that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It should be accepted that this ACS population represent a part of the spectrum of the ACS, and in particular in this group of patients treatment should focus not only on the stabilization of the culprit site but also warrants a broader approach to systemic stabilization of the arteries. However, recurrent cardiovascular events in this population still remain unacceptably high, indicating that plaque rupture or vulnerability of multiple plaques is a current challenge in the management of ACS patients.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

[The possible clinical role of the cardiac pulmonary power in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Initial observations].

The heart is a muscular mechanical pump with an ability to generate both flow [cardiac output] and pressure in the systemic circulation as well in the pulmonary vascular bed. The product of flow output and systemic arterial pressure is the rate of useful work done, or cardiac power output [CP], therefore for the right ventricle and the pulmonary arterial vascular bed it will be: the product of flow output and mean pulmonary arterial pressure will be the rate of useful work done, or cardiac pulmonary power output [CPP]. Cardiac pulmonary pumping reserve capability can be defined as the maximal cardiac pulmonary power output [CPP] achieved by the right heart during maximal stimulation. Therefore, CPP reserve is the increase in power output as the cardiac performance is increased from the resting to the maximally stimulated state. Recently, several studies have shown that CP is a direct indicator of overall cardiac function, as well is an indicator of exercise capacity and a powerful predictor of prognosis for patients with severe heart failure and ischemic cardiogenic shock. On this basis: 1. we decided to investigate the possible previously mentioned roles of the CP and CPP in patients with different degrees of pulmonary arterial hypertension [n = 137], but mainly in those with primary pulmonary arterial hypertension [PPH]. PPH patients [n = 50], as well as those with Eisenmenger's syndrome [n = 10] were found to have most abnormal resting CPP Indexes [I], [0.431 +/- 0.171, 0.607 +/- 0.124 watts/m2, respectively]. During exercise in PPH patients [n = 14], both CPI and CPPI reserves although they increase, were also found to be significantly diminished [CPI: from 0.546 +/- 170 to 1,116 +/- 0.275 watts/m2, p < 0.05], [CPPI: from 0.373 +/- 0.156 to 0.837 +/- 0.226 watts/m2, p < 0.05]. 2. We also found, significant differences in resting CPPI between PPH responders and no responders patients to hydralazine [0.273 +/- 0.04, 0.507 +/- 0.142 watts/m2, respectively, p < 0.01]. During exercise and under the influence of hydralazine, CPPI "reserve" was significantly diminished in those patients considered as not responders [0.507 +/- 0.142 to 0.723 +/- 0.232 watts/m2, p = ns] when compared with responders to the vasodilator therapy [0.273 +/- 0.04 to 0.903 +/- 0.057 watts/m2, p < 0.01]. On the basis of these initial findings on CPPI in PPH patients, we think that the values of this parameter should be investigated as an index for classifying the severity of this arterial vascular disease, for selecting patients as responders or not to vasodilator therapy, and in the future, to explore the possibility of is usefulness as a prognostic predictor index of mortality in a large population of patients with PPH.

Blood Pressure↗

[From the single vulnerable plaque, to the multiple complex coronary plaques. From their basis, to the modern therapeutic approach. A clinical reality in the spectrum of the acute coronary syndromes].

Contemporary clinical and laboratory data have challenged our classical concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes [ACS]. Indeed, several independent lines of clinical evidence have supported that the critical stenoses cause only a fraction of the ACS. Acute myocardial infarction is believed to be caused by rupture of a vulnerable coronary-artery plaque that appears as a single lesion on angiography. However, plaque instability might be caused by pathophysiologic processes, such as inflammation, that exert adverse effects throughout the coronary vasculature and therefore result in multiple unstable lesions. Recent studies have demonstrated that ruptured or vulnerable plaques exist not only at the culprit lesion but also in the whole coronary artery in some ACS patients. It has also been reported that a ruptured plaque at the culprit lesion is associated with elevated C- reactive protein and other inflammatory markers, which indeed indicate a poor prognosis in patients with ACS. Also, multiple plaque rupture is associated with systemic inflammation, and patients with multiple plaque rupture can be expected to show a poor prognosis. Therefore some ACS patients [20-40%] may harbor multiple complex coronary plaques that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It should be accepted that this ACS population represent a part of the spectrum of the ACS, and in particular in this group of patients treatment should focus not only on the stabilization of the culprit site but also warrants a broader approach to systemic stabilization of the arteries. However, recurrent cardiovascular events in this population still remain unacceptably high, indicating that plaque rupture or vulnerability of multiple plaques is a current challenge in the management of ACS patients.

Acute Disease↗

[Recent considerations of cardiogenic shock associated to the acute coronary ischemic syndromes].

We review novel physiopathological concept of Cardiogenic Shock associated to acute coronary ischemic syndromes, where the mechanist terms become jumbled not only, but the neuro-hormonal, immuno-inflammatory, and biomolecular alterations. In order to offer a pharmacointensive treatment that obtains the stabilization of the acute coronary Syndrome, for the reduction of myocardial ischemia. Also, we incorporate the incidence of this pathology in the Mexican population.

Acute Disease↗