Edward A Black | PubMed Health

PubMed2004

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has been adopted enthusiastically worldwide. However, despite more than 6 years' experience and refinement, many surgeons use it only sporadically and some hardly at all. This reluctance persists despite support for the procedure because of the lack of properly designed risk models and/or randomized studies. Although it has not been overwhelmingly shown that off-pump surgery is superior to the conventional on-pump procedure, the technique has its place in our specialty. It has been shown to be better for noncritical end points in selected patients in the hands of selected surgeons. That there are differences in surgical skill among surgeons is something we all know but rarely discuss in public. Until now, disparities in skill have been most salient with uncommon and extraordinarily challenging operations. Perhaps the off-pump procedure should be regarded as the "challenging" aspect of coronary artery bypass surgery, and self-restraint may need to remain in force if we are to continue to achieve the highest level of clinical excellence.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2002

Minimally invasive vein harvesting significantly reduces pain and wound morbidity.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting is advocated to reduce wound morbidity. Our early experience with minimally invasive techniques, however, suggested that increased tissue traction and trauma might follow. We aimed to test the hypothesis that minimally invasive harvesting reduces post-operative pain and inflammation. A secondary objective was to determine if minimally invasive harvesting could be performed efficiently. METHODS: Forty patients were prospectively randomised into minimally invasive harvesting (Minimal, n=22) and traditional open harvesting (Open, n=18). A modified bridging technique was used for minimally invasive harvesting (SaphLITE, Genzyme Surgical Products, Cambridge, MA, USA). One surgeon performed all operations. Primary end points were signs of impaired healing (a composite score) and pain (visual analogue score). Secondary end-points (operation variables) were also collected. Continuous variables were analysed by Student's t-test and categorical variables were analysed by Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups (height, weight, albumin, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease). In the early post-operative period, Minimal group had significantly less leg wound pain (P=0.04) and wound sepsis scores (P=0.01). Sternal pain was the same in both groups. After 6 weeks, wound scores and leg pain scores were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in rate of harvest (1.1 cm/min in each group). In Minimal group, 4 cm veins were harvested for each 1 cm skin incision compared with 1 cm in Open group (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting significantly reduces early post-operative leg pain and wound sepsis. Our study demonstrates that minimally invasive harvesting can be performed at a satisfactory speed and should be considered to help reduce early post-operative morbidity.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗