PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Edwige Quillet

Publications and source records attributed to Edwige Quillet.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A type I and type II microsatellite linkage map of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms.

BACKGROUND: The development of large genomic resources has become a prerequisite to elucidate the wide-scale evolution of genomes and the molecular basis of complex traits. Linkage maps represent a first level of integration and utilization of such resources and the primary framework for molecular analyses of quantitative traits. Previously published linkage maps have already outlined the main peculiarities of the rainbow trout meiosis and a correspondance between linkage groups and chromosome arms has been recently established using fluorescent in situ hybridization. The number of chromosome arms which were covered by these maps remained unknown. RESULTS: We report an updated linkage map based on segregation analysis of more than nine hundred microsatellite markers in two doubled haploid gynogenetic lines. These markers segregated into 31 linkage groups spanning an approximate total map length of 2750 cM. Centromeres were mapped for all the linkage groups using meiogenetic lines. For each of the 31 linkage groups, the meta or acrocentric structure infered from centromere mapping was identical with those recently found with fluorescent in situ hybridization results. The present map is therefore assumed to cover the 52 chromosome arms which constitute the rainbow trout karyotype. Our data confirm the occurrence of a high interference level in this species. Homeologous regions were identified in eleven linkage groups, reflecting the tetraploid nature of the salmonid genome. The data supported the assumption that gene orders are conserved between duplicated groups and that each group is located on a single chromosome arm. Overall, a high congruence with already published rainbow trout linkage maps was found for both gene syntenies and orders. CONCLUSION: This new map is likely to cover the whole set of chromosome arms and should provide a useful framework to integrate existing or forthcoming rainbow trout linkage maps and other genomic resources. Since very large numbers of EST containing microsatellite sequences are available in databases, it becomes feasible to construct high-density linkage maps localizing known genes. This will facilitate comparative mapping and, eventually, identification of candidate genes in QTL studies.

Animals↗

Wide range of susceptibility to rhabdoviruses in homozygous clones of rainbow trout.

Inbred lines differentially susceptible to diseases are a powerful tool to get insights into the mechanisms of genetic resistance to pathogens. In fish, chromosome manipulation techniques allow a quick production of such homozygous lines. Using gynogenesis, we produced nine homozygous clones of rainbow trout from a domestic population (INRA Sy strain). We examined the variability between clones for resistance to two rhabdoviruses, the viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) and the infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV). Intraperitoneal injections and waterborne infections were performed in parallel for both viruses. No survival was recorded after intraperitoneal injection of VHSV or IHNV, indicating that fish from all clones were fully susceptible to both viruses by this route of infection. In contrast, the different clones showed a wide range of survival frequency after waterborne infection. The resistance levels to VHSV ranged from 0 to 99% and resistance was not abrogated when resistant and sensitive animals were mixed and subjected to waterborne infection. VHSV was recovered from 10% of resistant fish after waterborne infection, confirming that virus replication was possible in this context but effective only in a low proportion of the population. The different clones also exhibited a wide range of survival (0-68%) after a waterborne infection with IHNV. Although VHSV-resistant clones were not fully resistant to IHNV, the susceptibility to IHNV and VHSV tended to be correlated, suggesting that non-specific mechanisms common to both viruses were involved.

Animals↗

Phenotypic and functional similarity of gut intraepithelial and systemic T cells in a teleost fish.

Gut-associated lymphocytes were described in fish, but their involvement in immune responses is still unknown. In rainbow trout, intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) are scattered between gut epithelial cells, but neither Peyer's patches nor mesenteric lymph nodes were identified. Rainbow trout IELs contain mainly T cells, because they expressed transcripts of T cell marker homologs of CD8, CD4, CD28, CD3epsilon, TCRzeta, TCRgamma, and TCRbeta and lacked IgM. However, trout IELs did not show specific homing to the gut mucosa, which in mammals defines IELs as a distinctive mucosal population. A detailed analysis of the TCRbeta repertoire of rainbow trout IELs was performed in both naive and virus-infected animals. TCRbeta transcripts of rainbow trout IELs were highly diverse and polyclonal in adult naive individuals, in sharp contrast with the restricted diversity of IEL oligoclonal repertoires described in birds and mammals. Significant modifications of the trout IEL TCRbeta repertoire were observed after a systemic infection with a fish rhabdovirus and were especially marked for Vbeta4-bearing receptors as previously reported for spleen cells. Thus, we could not find any specific properties of the trout IEL TCRbeta repertoire compared with the spleen and pronephros TCRbeta repertoire, which questions the reality of a distinct IEL compartment in teleosts. Our findings suggest that a highly diversified alphabeta TauCR repertoire is maintained in fish IELs in the absence of Peyer's patches and mesenteric lymph nodes, whereas the restricted diversity of mouse alphabeta IELs is attributed to multiple cycles of activation and recirculation, allowing a progressive narrowing of the repertoire.

Animals↗

A blue variant in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum.

A blue variant of the rainbow trout, which appeared in a French fish farm, displayed an iridescent body color that was cobalt blue on the back, lighter on the undersides, and silvery on the belly and which held up to adult stage. This color was supposed to result from a Tyndall effect involving a structural arrangement of melanin pigments because it disappeared when it was associated with a depigmenting gene. This blue variant appeared to be governed by an autosomal recessive gene. Blue fry survival and body weight were about 25% less than those of wild-type sibs, but no major problem was observed in further breeding performances, including reproduction. These features do not correspond with those of the blue variants previously described in the rainbow trout.

Animals↗

Enhanced individual selection for selecting fast growing fish: the "PROSPER" method, with application on brown trout (Salmo trutta fario).

Growth rate is the main breeding goal of fish breeders, but individual selection has often shown poor responses in fish species. The PROSPER method was developed to overcome possible factors that may contribute to this low success, using (1) a variable base population and high number of breeders (Ne >100), (2) selection within groups with low non-genetic effects and (3) repeated growth challenges. Using calculations, we show that individual selection within groups, with appropriate management of maternal effects, can be superior to mass selection as soon as the maternal effect ratio exceeds 0.15, when heritability is 0.25. Practically, brown trout were selected on length at the age of one year with the PROSPER method. The genetic gain was evaluated against an unselected control line. After four generations, the mean response per generation in length at one year was 6.2% of the control mean, while the mean correlated response in weight was 21.5% of the control mean per generation. At the 4th generation, selected fish also appeared to be leaner than control fish when compared at the same size, and the response on weight was maximal (approximately 130% of the control mean) between 386 and 470 days post fertilisation. This high response is promising, however, the key points of the method have to be investigated in more detail.

Animals↗