Biomedical subjects

Eiichi Naito

Publications and source records attributed to Eiichi Naito.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration.

We investigated how the human sensory-motor system elicits a somatosensory aftereffect. Tendon vibration of a limb excites the muscle spindle afferents that contribute to eliciting illusory movements of the limb. After the cessation of vibration, a transient sensation in which the vibrated limb returns towards its original position (kinesthetic aftereffect) is often experienced, even in the absence of the afferent inputs recruited by the vibration. We vibrated the tendon of either the right wrist extensor or flexor muscle that elicited an illusory flexion or extension movement, which was followed by its corresponding extension or flexion aftereffect. First, we psychophysically investigated how the preceding illusory movement affects the aftereffect. Second, we examined the cortico-spinal excitability during the aftereffect to evaluate its changes from the time during the illusion. We measured the amplitude of the motor-evoked potential that is evoked by a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to the hand section of the contralateral motor cortex (M1). All 19 subjects experienced the aftereffect, and the amount of aftereffect was approximately 70% of the preceding illusion. During the illusion, the cortico-spinal excitability increased more in non-vibrated than in vibrated muscle, so as to reflect the illusory directions. During the aftereffect, the excitability was significantly reduced only in the non-vibrated muscle, with no change in the vibrated muscle, which, in turn, caused an opposite pattern in the unbalanced excitability between the two muscles, and the degree of unbalanced excitability was correlated with the sensation of aftereffect. The kinesthetic aftereffect seems to be elicited by a sensory process that is determined by the preceding illusory movements. Motor-cortical processing of the unbalanced sensory information from the stimulated and non-stimulated muscles may contribute to the elicitation of kinesthetic aftereffect.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex.

Manipulation of objects and tool-use are known to be controlled by a network of frontal motor and parietal areas. Here, we investigate which of these areas are associated with the somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement using functional magnetic resonance imaging. To dissociate the sensation of movement from the motor control commands, we used a new kinesthetic illusion. Twelve blindfolded right-handed participants placed the palm of their right or left hand on an object (a ball). Simultaneously, we vibrated the tendon of the wrist extensor muscle. This elicited the illusion that the wrist is flexing and the touched object is also moving along with the hand (hand-object illusion). As controls, we vibrated the skin surface over the nearby bone, which does not elicit any illusions, or we vibrated the tendon when the hand did not touch the object, which only generates the illusory flexion of the hand. We found that the hand-object illusion specifically activated the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) (supramarginal gyrus and parietal operculum, including cytoarchitectonic areas ip1 and op1) and area 44. The left IPL was activated both during the hand-object illusions with the right and left hands, and the activity was greater than in the right corresponding parietal region, suggesting a dominant role of the left hemisphere. We conclude that the left IPL is involved in the somatic perception of hand-object interactive movement and suggest that the underlying mechanism is the somatic integration of internal information about the body and external information about the object.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Neural substrate of body size: illusory feeling of shrinking of the waist.

The perception of the size and shape of one's body (body image) is a fundamental aspect of how we experience ourselves. We studied the neural correlates underlying perceived changes in the relative size of body parts by using a perceptual illusion in which participants felt that their waist was shrinking. We scanned the brains of the participants using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found that activity in the cortices lining the left postcentral sulcus and the anterior part of the intraparietal sulcus reflected the illusion of waist shrinking, and that this activity was correlated with the reported degree of shrinking. These results suggest that the perceived changes in the size and shape of body parts are mediated by hierarchically higher-order somatosensory areas in the parietal cortex. Based on this finding we suggest that relative size of body parts is computed by the integration of more elementary somatic signals from different body segments.

Body Image↗

PubMed2005

Reduction of cortico-spinal excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation at predictable timing.

Electrophysiological studies have shown that cortico-spinal excitability increases during the motor preparation period in reaction time (RT) paradigms. However, there is a line of contradictory evidence with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) showing that its excitability is reduced during the preparation period. In these studies, the subjects can predict the TMS timings. Thus we investigated how the predictability of TMS timing affects cortico-spinal excitability. A single-pulse TMS was delivered to the hand section of the left motor cortex while seven right-handed subjects relaxed their hands in a flexed position. We prepared three conditions: (i) in the semi-PREDICTABLE condition, two visual stimuli at 500 ms interval were presented and the TMS was delivered either 0, 125, 250, 375, or 500 ms after the first stimulus; (ii) in the PREDICTABLE condition, the TMS was provided only at 500 ms after the first stimulus; (iii) in the UNPREDICTABLE condition, no visual cue preceded the TMS. We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the wrist flexor and extensor muscles. We found a significant reduction of MEP amplitude in the flexor muscles in both the PREDICTABLE and semi-PREDICTABLE conditions, but not in the UNPREDICTABLE condition. These results showed that the predictability of TMS per se, without the preparation of motor outputs, can reduce cortico-spinal excitability.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia.

We have previously shown that motor areas are engaged when subjects experience illusory limb movements elicited by tendon vibration. However, traditionally cytoarchitectonic area 2 is held responsible for kinesthesia. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging and cytoarchitectural mapping to examine whether area 2 is engaged in kinesthesia, whether it is engaged bilaterally because area 2 in non-human primates has strong callosal connections, which other areas are active members of the network for kinesthesia, and if there is a dominance for the right hemisphere in kinesthesia as has been suggested. Ten right-handed blindfolded healthy subjects participated. The tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscles of the right or left hand was vibrated at 80 Hz, which elicited illusory palmar flexion in an immobile hand (illusion). As control we applied identical stimuli to the skin over the processus styloideus ulnae, which did not elicit any illusions (vibration). We found robust activations in cortical motor areas [areas 4a, 4p, 6; dorsal premotor cortex (PMD) and bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA)] and ipsilateral cerebellum during kinesthetic illusions (illusion-vibration). The illusions also activated contralateral area 2 and right area 2 was active in common irrespective of illusions of right or left hand. Right areas 44, 45, anterior part of intraparietal region (IP1) and caudo-lateral part of parietal opercular region (OP1), cortex rostral to PMD, anterior insula and superior temporal gyrus were also activated in common during illusions of right or left hand. These right-sided areas were significantly more activated than the corresponding areas in the left hemisphere. The present data, together with our previous results, suggest that human kinesthesia is associated with a network of active brain areas that consists of motor areas, cerebellum, and the right fronto-parietal areas including high-order somatosensory areas. Furthermore, our results provide evidence for a right hemisphere dominance for perception of limb movement.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Your hand movements in my somatosensory cortex: a visuo-kinesthetic function in human area 2.

Does viewing someone's actions activate a viewer's somatosensory cortex? We tested if visual information of limb movements activated limb sections in somatosensory areas that are normally engaged in kinesthetic processing of the limb. We showed, with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 17 right-handed healthy subjects, that passive observation of flexion-extension movements of an experimenter's right hand activated the observer's contralateral hand section of area 2 which is involved in kinesthetic processing of right hand movements. This could be interpreted as a pragmatic function of the brain that permits visual information to reach the somatosensory area, and suggests human area 2 has an association function between kinesthesia and vision.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Role of the cerebellum in implicit motor skill learning: a PET study.

To depict neural substrates of implicit motor learning, regional cerebral blood flow was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) in 13 volunteers in the rest condition and during performance of a unimanual two-ball rotation task. Subjects rotated two balls in a single hand; a slow rotation (0.5 Hz) was followed by two sessions requiring as rapid rotation as possible. The process was repeated four times by a single hand (Block 1) and then by the opposite hand (Block 2). One group of volunteers began with the right hand (n = 7), and the other with the left (n = 6). Performance was assessed by both quickness and efficiency of movements. The former was assessed with the maximum number of rotation per unit time, and the latter with the electromyographic activity under constant speed of the movement. Both showed learning transfer from the right hand to the left hand. Activation of cerebrum and cerebellum varied according to hand. Activation common to both hands occurred in the bilateral dorsal premotor cortex and parasagittal cerebellum, right inferior frontal gyms, left lateral cerebellum and thalamus, supplementary motor area, and cerebellar vermis. The left lateral cerebellum showed the most prominent activation on the first trial of the novel task, and hence may be related the early phase of learning, or "what to do" learning. Left parasagittal cerebellum activity diminished with training both in first and second blocks, correlating inversely with task performance. This region may therefore be involved in later learning or "how to do" learning. The activity of these regions was less prominent with prior training than without it. Thus the left cerebellar hemisphere may be related to learning transfer across hands.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: an fMRI study.

Dynamic facial expressions of emotion constitute natural and powerful media of communication between individuals. However, little is known about the neural substrate underlying the processing of dynamic facial expressions of emotion. We depicted the brain areas by using fMRI with 22 right-handed healthy subjects. The facial expressions are dynamically morphed from neutral to fearful or happy expressions. Two types of control stimuli were presented: (i) static facial expressions, which provided sustained fearful or happy expressions, and (ii) dynamic mosaic images, which provided dynamic information with no facial features. Subjects passively viewed these stimuli. The left amygdala was highly activated in response to dynamic facial expressions relative to both control stimuli in the case of fearful expressions, but not in the case of happy expressions. The broad region of the occipital and temporal cortices, especially in the right hemisphere, which included the activation foci of the inferior occipital gyri, middle temporal gyri, and fusiform gyri, showed higher activation during viewing of the dynamic facial expressions than it did during the viewing of either control stimulus, common to both expressions. In the same manner, the right ventral premotor cortex was also activated. These results identify the neural substrate for enhanced emotional, perceptual/cognitive, and motor processing of dynamic facial expressions of emotion.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Two different effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the human motor cortex during the pre-movement period.

A single-pulse TMS to the human motor cortex (M1) influences reaction time (RT). We may summarize from previous studies where different groups of subjects participated in various types of RT tasks that TMS above motor threshold (MT) delays RT, whereas TMS below MT shortens RT and that these RT changes depends on TMS timings during RT period. However, these effects have never been systematically investigated in a single study where an identical group of subjects participated. The purpose of this study is to test previous TMS effects in a study of simple RT task. Seven subjects isometrically abducted their right index fingers as quickly as possible when a visual stimulus appeared. A single-pulse TMS was randomly delivered over the left M1 at various timings during RT period in a single trial (at 0, 40, 60, 80 or 100 ms after the visual stimulus). Motor-evoked potential (MEP) and EMG activity for response were recorded from the right finger muscles. Only the TMS above MT delivered at 80 or 100 ms, which increased MEP amplitude, significantly delayed RT and increased the size of response EMG activities that may reflect contents of central motor commands. The TMS below MT at these timings, which occasionally evoked MEP, exclusively shortened RT despite the fact that the response EMG size was unchanged. A single-pulse TMS has different effects on the ongoing neuronal processes in M1 during the pre-movement period: TMS above MT may temporally retard the processes and also affect contents of central motor commands, whereas TMS below MT may simply facilitate its processes without affecting motor commands.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement.

We can precisely control only what we can sense. Sensing limb position or limb movement is essential when we precisely control our limb movements. It has been generally believed that somatic perception takes place in the neuronal network of somatosensory areas. Recent neuroimaging techniques (PET, fMRI, transcranial magnetic stimulation) have revealed in human brains that motor areas participate in somatic perception of limb movements during kinesthetic illusion in the absence of actual limb movement. In particular, the primary motor cortex, which is an executive locus of voluntary limb movements, is primarily responsible for kinesthetic perception of limb movements. This probably forms the most efficient circuits for voluntary limb movements between the controlled muscles and the motor areas.

Extremities↗

PubMed2003

Moving tactile stimuli of fingers are integrated in the intraparietal and inferior parietal cortices.

When two cylinders are passively moved in-phase on the volar surface of the right second and third fingers, human subjects estimate the stimuli to originate from one object, whereas two separate objects are estimated for out-of-phase stimuli. While five blindfolded subjects performed this estimation task, brain activity was measured by fMRI. The in-phase stimuli activated the left intraparietal and inferior parietal areas significantly more than did out-of-phase stimuli. These parietal regions may play important roles in the integration of moving tactile stimuli that are independently provided on plural fingers, from which subjects internally construct a single object.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations.

We investigate whether imagery of voluntary movements of different body parts activates somatotopical sections of the human motor cortices. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to detect the cortical activity when 7 healthy subjects imagine performing repetitive (0.5-Hz) flexion/extension movements of the right fingers or right toes, or horizontal movements of the tongue. We also collected functional images when the subjects actually executed these movements and used these data to define somatotopical representations in the motor areas. In this study, we relate the functional activation maps to cytoarchitectural population maps of areas 4a, 4p, and 6 in the same standard anatomical space. The important novel findings are 1). that imagery of hand movements specifically activates the hand sections of the contralateral primary motor cortex (area 4a) and the contralateral dorsal premotor cortex (area 6) and a hand representation located in the caudal cingulate motor area and the most ventral part of the supplementary motor area; 2). that when imagining making foot movements, the foot zones of the posterior part of the contralateral supplementary motor area (area 6) and the contralateral primary motor cortex (area 4a) are active; and 3). that imagery of tongue movements activates the tongue region of the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex bilaterally (areas 4a, 4p, and 6). These results demonstrate that imagery of action engages the somatotopically organized sections of the primary motor cortex in a systematic manner as well as activating some body-part-specific representations in the nonprimary motor areas. Thus the content of the mental motor image, in this case the body part, is reflected in the pattern of motor cortical activation.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Internal simulation of expected sensory experiences before movements get started.

The functions of the cortical and subcortical motor areas have been regarded as the execution and control of limb movements. We introduce recent neuroimaging evidence in humans that somatic sensation elicited by afferent inputs that signal limb movement also engage the motor areas. It is generally understood that somatic sensation can only be experienced once movement has been executed. Here we provide evidence that somatic sensation of limb movement can be internally simulated before the movement gets started by recruiting the motor areas. It is suggested that the sensory experiences that are expected when movements are actually executed can be internally simulated in the network of the motor areas during motor imagery.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement.

The primary motor cortex (MI) is regarded as the site for motor control. Occasional reports that MI neurons react to sensory stimuli have either been ignored or attributed to guidance of voluntary movements. Here, we show that MI activation is necessary for the somatic perception of movement of our limbs. We made use of an illusion: when the wrist tendon of one hand is vibrated, it is perceived as the hand moving. If the vibrated hand has skin contact with the other hand, it is perceived as both hands bending. Using fMRI and TMS, we show that the activation in MI controlling the nonvibrated hand is compulsory for the somatic perception of the hand movement. This novel function of MI contrasts with its traditional role as the executive locus of voluntary limb movement.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum.

It has been proposed that motor imagery contains an element of sensory experiences (kinesthetic sensations), which is a substitute for the sensory feedback that would normally arise from the overt action. No evidence has been provided about whether kinesthetic sensation is centrally simulated during motor imagery. We psychophysically tested whether motor imagery of palmar flexion or dorsiflexion of the right wrist would influence the sensation of illusory palmar flexion elicited by tendon vibration. We also tested whether motor imagery of wrist movement shared the same neural substrates involving the illusory sensation elicited by the peripheral stimuli. Regional cerebral blood flow was measured with H215O and positron emission tomography in 10 right-handed subjects. The right tendon of the wrist extensor was vibrated at 83 Hz ("illusion") or at 12.5 Hz with no illusion ("vibration"). Subjects imagined doing wrist movements of alternating palmar and dorsiflexion at the same speed with the experienced illusory movements ("imagery"). A "rest" condition with eyes closed was included. We identified common active fields between the contrasts of imagery versus rest and illusion versus vibration. Motor imagery of palmar flexion psychophysically enhanced the experienced illusory angles of plamar flexion, whereas dorsiflexion imagery reduced it in the absence of overt movement. Motor imagery and the illusory sensation commonly activated the contralateral cingulate motor areas, supplementary motor area, dorsal premotor cortex, and ipsilateral cerebellum. We conclude that kinesthetic sensation associated with imagined movement is internally simulated during motor imagery by recruiting multiple motor areas.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Perceptual distortion of intrapersonal and near-personal space sensed by proprioception.

It is known that the illusory displacement of a vibrated limb can be transferred to a nonvibrated contacted limb. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the transferred illusory displacements occurring in the intrapersonal and near-personal space. In two tasks, 8 male and 8 female blindfolded subjects estimated (1) the height of the left elbow and (2) the height of an external object located at the same height as the left elbow, by the proprioception of the right arm which was Subject to illusory displacement. If the internal representation of the left elbow in one's body schema could provide precise information of its static position independently of the proprioception of the right arm, the perceived displacement of the right arm might be smaller when influenced by proprioceptive information from the static left arm, than when in contrast instead with an object which is not a body part. There was no difference in the estimation of illusory displacement between male and female subjects and between right and left arms. No significant difference was observed between transferred displacements of the left elbow and the object. This means that the perception of limb position sensed by the proprioception of another limb can be distorted as easily as the perception of location of an external object. This suggests that the internal representation of static limb position is not enough to provide the correct information of current limb position in the absence of vision.

Adult↗