Biomedical subjects

Eileen M O'Reilly

Publications and source records attributed to Eileen M O'Reilly.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Molecular and Clinical Determinants of Targeted Therapy Treatment in Biliary Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: Actionable genomic alterations occur in all anatomic subsets of biliary tract cancer; however, targeted therapies have not shown a survival advantage over cytotoxics, and resistance mechanisms require further characterization. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed a prospectively maintained cohort of 1,254 patients with histologically confirmed biliary tract cancer who underwent molecular profiling using an FDA-authorized targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay. We defined actionable alterations across anatomic subsets, compared outcomes with targeted therapy versus cytotoxics, and evaluated genomic correlates of resistance using longitudinal samples. RESULTS: Overall, 59% of patients harbored at least one OncoKB alteration, and 32.2% (intrahepatic 40%, extrahepatic 15%, and gallbladder 22%) had a level 1/2 alteration. Emerging targets included KRAS alterations (17%), MTAP deletions (12.8%), MDM2 amplification (6.5%), and MET amplification (1.5%). Targeted therapy was associated with improved progression-free survival but not overall survival. Co-occurring TP53/RAS pathway and SMAD4 alterations were associated with inferior outcomes in IDH1/FGFR2-and ERBB2-driven tumors, respectively. Longitudinal profiling demonstrated ERBB2 loss in ERBB2-driven tumors, whereas IDH-, FGFR-, BRAF-, and NTRK-driven tumors retained the primary oncogenic driver. Acquired resistance was associated with alterations in RAS, MEK, MET, MYC, and CDKN2A. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive molecular profiling study illustrates the real-world utility and limitations of targeted NGS of biliary tract cancer and affirms the use of precision medicine in patients with these diseases. Genomic heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance observed in this study has the potential to inform ongoing drug development efforts for biliary tract cancer.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Target Antigen Identification for Antibody Drug Conjugate Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Data on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) target expression prevalence, intertumoral heterogeneity, genomic concordance, and its effect on clinical outcomes is limited in biliary tract cancers (BTC). METHODS: Resected primary BTC specimens, and when available, matched metastatic samples were assembled into tissue microarrays and tested for CLDN18.2, c-MET, Nectin-4, TROP2, and HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). A subset underwent targeted next-generation sequencing using MSK-IMPACT (NCT01775072). Exploratory associations of target expression with clinicopathologic parameters, genomic alterations, recurrence-free (RFS), and overall (OS) survival were evaluated. RESULTS: 65 patients with resected BTC and 18 paired metastatic sites were identified-43% extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 40% intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 17% gallbladder cancer. All evaluated target antigens were expressed; percent positivity and H-score ≥200 were: TROP2 (83%, 26%), c-MET (75%, 26%), Nectin-4 (66%, 35%), and CLDN18.2 (46%, 7.7%). HER2 overexpression occurred in 3.1% of tumors. Overall agreement among paired primary and metastatic samples on calling either positive or negative ranged from 43% to 75% with the highest observed for HER2 [75%; κ=0.29 (95%CI: -0.32 to 0.91)] and TROP2 (71%; κ not available) and lowest for c-MET, CLDN18.2, and Nectin-4. Frequently altered genes included TP53 (36%), SMAD4 (27%), ELF3 (21%). We observed no significant association between target antigen expression with genomics, RFS, or OS. CONCLUSIONS: BTC displays frequent but heterogeneous expression of multiple ADC targets. These hypothesis generating findings suggest inherent complexity of target protein quantification, target threshold determination, and target sampling discordance. Future studies will be required to refine our understanding the utlitiy of ADCs in BTC.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Addition of High-Dose Vitamin D3 to Standard Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The SOLARIS Randomized Clinical Trial (Alliance A021703).

IMPORTANCE: In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard treatment improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard-dose vitamin D3 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE: To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated mCRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolling 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC, conducted in the US through the National Clinical Trials Network from October 2019 to December 2022 (database freeze: July 15, 2024). INTERVENTIONS: mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6 [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin]) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab every 2 weeks with either high-dose vitamin D3 (8000 IU daily × 14 days as loading dose followed by 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose vitamin D3 (400 IU daily) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS assessed by the unstratified log-rank test. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS were performed according to known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 455 randomized patients (median age, 59 years; 181 [40%] female) with median follow-up 20 months, the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D3 (n = 228) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-12.2) for standard-dose vitamin D3 (n = 227) (1-sided log-rank P = .25). There were no significant differences in objective response rate between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D3 (51% [95% CI, 44%-58%] vs 44% [95% CI, 37%-50%], respectively; P = .12), or in overall survival (median, 25.6 vs 27.0 months; 1-sided log-rank P = .66). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the most common grade 3 or greater adverse events between the high- and standard-dose groups, including neutropenia (n = 67 [32%] vs n = 62 [30%]) and hypertension (n = 42 [20%] vs n = 49 [23%]) or in incidence of vitamin D-associated toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with previously untreated mCRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did not improve PFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094688.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Pancreatic Cancer: Translating Tumor Biology into Actionability.

UNLABELLED: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for 90% of pancreatic cancers and has a very poor prognosis. Ten to 15% are staged as resectable at diagnosis, and 5% to 15% downstaged with therapy to where surgery is feasible. Chemotherapy is a mainstay for all stages of PDAC. Targeted therapies are available for patients with select but expanding actionable genomic alterations. The tumor microenvironment provides a dense stroma with an immunosuppressive milieu that contributes to inherent treatment resistance of PDAC. Herein, we review current management of PDAC with a focus on emerging treatment paradigms, including targeted and immunomodulatory agents. SIGNIFICANCE: PDAC is a complex disease with unique genomic, immunologic, and clinical features. Recent developments in understanding of the pathobiology of this disease are translating into targeted and immunomodulatory therapies that will alter treatment paradigms and improve outcomes for this recalcitrant malignancy.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Cabozantinib for advanced grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CABINET trial (Alliance A021602).

Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have recently been described as a distinct category, and randomized data regarding efficacy of therapy for these patients are scarce. In the phase 3 CABINET trial, cabozantinib improved PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced, previously treated, progressive extra-pancreatic NETs (epNETs) and pancreatic NETs (pNETs) of all grades. Here, we evaluate if these results remain consistent in a subgroup of patients with well-differentiated G3 NETs. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic epNETs or pNETs were randomized 2:1 in independent cohorts to receive cabozantinib 60 mg daily vs placebo. We analyzed outcomes of the subset of patients with G3 NETs (Ki-67 > 20%), combining patients in the pNET and epNET cohorts due to small sample sizes. Twenty-four patients had G3 NETs, 16 randomized to cabozantinib and 8 to placebo. Primary sites included pancreas (n = 12), GI tract (n = 7), unknown primary sites (n = 3), and lung/thymus (n = 2). Median PFS for patients with G3 NETs treated with cabozantinib was 7.9 vs 3 months with placebo (HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.57, 1-sided log-rank P = 0.0034). The confirmed overall radiographic response rate was 25% (4/16) with cabozantinib vs 0% (0/8) with placebo. Safety outcomes were consistent with published data for the trial as a whole. Subset analysis of the CABINET trial showed improved PFS associated with cabozantinib vs placebo for G3 NETs of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic origin. Despite limited numbers, these results suggest that cabozantinib can be an effective option for patients with advanced G3 NETs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375320.

Humans↗