PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eileen Stanford

Publications and source records attributed to Eileen Stanford.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Biventricular assist device utilization for patients with morbid congestive heart failure: a justifiable strategy.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for the use of a biventricular assist device (BiVAD) for morbid congestive heart failure (MCHF) has been questioned because of historically unacceptable rates of postimplant and post-transplant mortality as well as perceived barriers to their outpatient management. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who received a Thoratec BiVAD from January 1990 to December 2003 at the University of Pittsburgh were studied retrospectively. There were a total of 73 patients (32% ischemic, 21% idiopathic, and 47% other) who had a BiVAD implanted. Before implantation, 100% were on > or =1 inotropic agent, and 77% had an intra-aortic balloon pump. Overall survival was 69%; 42 patients (84%) received cardiac transplantation, 5 patients (10%) were weaned, and 3 (6%) remained supported on BiVAD. If the 14 patients with postcardiotomy failure and acute myocardial infarction with shock are excluded, the overall survival improves to 75%. Five-year actuarial survival after heart transplantation was 58%. Of the 29 patients implanted before 2000, the 4-month actuarial freedom from driveline infections, bloodstream infections, and neurological events was 10%, 54%, and 48%, respectively, whereas the rates of these events for the 44 patients implanted after 2000 improved to 70%, 79%, and 80%, respectively. Since 2000, 21 (48%) patients were discharged from the hospital, of whom 38% went to an outpatient residence, 33% to a skilled nursing facility, and 29% to home. Once discharged, > or =1 readmission occurred in 45% and > or =2 readmissions in 48%. CONCLUSIONS: BiVAD support for MCHF has an acceptable overall mortality and survival to transplantation. Morbidity has been significantly reduced in the past 4 years, and management as an outpatient is achievable.

Adult↗

Differential exercise performance on ventricular assist device support.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are approved for destination therapy because they improve survival in end-stage heart failure (HF). VADs are powered pneumatically or electrically. Pneumatic and electric left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and biventricular assist devices (BiVADs) provide excellent hemodynamic support at rest, but differences in their effects on exercise tolerance are unclear. We sought to evaluate the effect of devices with varying operating parameters on exercise capacity. METHODS: Exercise physiology data obtained during maximal exercise with on-line gas-exchange analysis were collected for 38 consecutive VAD-implanted HF patients referred for exercise testing. RESULTS: Electric LVADs were implanted in 18 patients, and pneumatic LVADs in 10 patients. Percent of predicted peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2%) was significantly greater in pneumatic LVAD patients (52.1 +/- 11.1% vs 38.2 +/- 11.3%, p < 0.05). The 10 patients implanted with a pneumatically powered LVAD were compared to 10 patients implanted with a pneumatically powered BiVAD. LVAD-supported patients had a higher VO2% (52.1 +/- 11.1% vs 36.5 +/- 17.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HF patients supported with a pneumatic LVAD appear to have better exercise tolerance than those receiving an electric LVAD. Patients on LVAD support have better exercise tolerance than BiVAD-supported patients. This highlights the importance of right ventricular function to exercise tolerance in HF patients, and may have implications for future VAD design.

Adult↗