Ekaterina G Deyanova | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures using FTMS and differential mass spectrometry.

Label-free LC-MS profiling is a powerful quantitative proteomic method to study relative peptide abundances between two or more biological samples. Here we demonstrate the use of a previously described comparative LC-MS method, differential mass spectrometry (dMS), to analyze high-resolution Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) data for detection and quantification of known peptide differences between two sets of complex mixtures. Six standard peptides were spiked into a processed plasma background at fixed ratios from 1.25:1 to 4:1 to make two sets of samples. The resulting mixtures were analyzed by microcapillary LC-FTMS and dMS. dMS successfully identified five out of the six peptides as statistically significant differences (p <or= 0.005). In this experiment, the smallest fold change reliably detected by our method was 1.5:1, and the errors of estimated ratios of concentrations were less than 20% for peptides spiked at 1.5:1 to 4:1. We conclude that LC-FTMS coupled with dMS is a useful label-free quantitative MS method that can be used to detect subtle yet statistically significant peptide differences in complex protein mixtures, including plasma samples.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures.

Efficiently identifying and quantifying disease- or treatment-related changes in the abundance of proteins is an important area of research for the pharmaceutical industry. Here we describe an automated, label-free method for finding differences in complex mixtures using complete LC-MS data sets, rather than subsets of extracted peaks or features. The method selectively finds statistically significant differences in the intensity of both high-abundance and low-abundance ions, accounting for the variability of measured intensities and the fact that true differences will persist in time. The method was used to compare two complex peptide mixtures with known peptide differences. This controlled experiment allowed us to assess the validity of each difference found and so to analyze the method's sensitivity and specificity. The method detects both presence versus absence and a 2-fold change in peptide concentration near the limit of detection of the instrument used, where chromatographic peaks may not be sufficiently well defined to be detected in individual samples. The method is more sensitive and gives fewer false positives than subtractive methods that ignore signal variability. Differential mass spectrometry combined with targeted MS/MS analysis of only identified differences may save both computation time and human effort compared to shotgun proteomics approaches.

Chromatography, Liquid↗