Biomedical subjects

Eli Molde Hagen

Publications and source records attributed to Eli Molde Hagen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comorbid subjective health complaints in low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To compare subjective health complaints in subacute patients with low back pain with reference values from a Norwegian normal population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Comorbidity is common with nonspecific low back pain. We wanted to investigate if these complaints were specific or part of a more general unspecific condition comparable to subjective health complaints in the normal population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 457 patients sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain. All subjects filled out questionnaires. The subjective health complaints in the study group were compared with reference values from a Norwegian normal population using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the normal reference population, the patients with low back pain had significantly more low back pain, neck pain, upper back pain, pain in the feet during exercise, headache, migraine, sleep problems, flushes/heat sensations, anxiety, and sadness/depression. The prevalence of pain in arms, pain in shoulders, and tiredness was also high, but not significantly higher than in the reference population. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that patients with low back pain suffer from what may be referred to as a "syndrome," consisting of muscle pain located to the whole spine as well as to legs and head, and accompanying sleep problems, anxiety, and sadness/depression.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Modifying effects in multivariate analyses of a randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic factors for the effect of a brief intervention ("modifiers") at a spine clinic on return to work in patients with subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A previous study of a brief intervention showed significant reduction of sick leave, compared with usual primary healthcare treatment. Randomized controlled trials give data only on the group as an average. Identifying prognostic factors that interact with the treatment ("modifiers") may identify specific groups requiring this or other types of treatment. METHODS: A total of 457 patients who had been sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain were randomized into an intervention group (spine clinic with medical examination, information, reassurance, encouragement to engage in physical activity, n = 237), and a control group (primary health care, n = 220). All subjects filled out questionnaires. Logistic regression and tests for interaction were used to identify prognostic factors and modifiers for return to work in the two groups, at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At 3 months of follow-up, the strongest modifying effect on return to work was the perception of constant back strain when working and beliefs about reduced ability to work. At 12 months, gastrointestinal complaints were the strongest modifier for the effect of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The spine clinic intervention seems to have a main effect on work absenteeism via interacting with the concerns of being unable to work.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term clinical and economical effects of a light mobilization program on the duration of sick leave for patients with subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Twelve-month follow-up results from a previous study showed that early intervention with examination at a spine clinic, giving the patients information, reassurance, and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had significant effect in reducing sick leave. At 12-month follow-up, 68.4% in the intervention group were off sick leave, as compared with 56.4% in the control group. Patients in this study were followed-up for a period of 3 years to investigate possible long-term effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifty-seven patients placed on a sick list for 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (n = 237) and a control group (n = 220). The intervention group was examined at a spine clinic and given information and advice to stay active. The control group was not examined at the clinic but was treated within the primary health care. RESULTS: Over the 3 years of observation, the intervention group had significantly fewer days of sickness compensation (average 125.7 d/person) than the control group (169.6 d/person). This difference is mainly caused by a more rapid return to work during the first year. There was no significant difference for the second or third year. In particular, there is no increased risk for reoccurrence of illness from early return to work. At 6-month follow-up, patients in the intervention group were less likely to use bed rest and more likely to use stretching and walking to cope with their back pain compared with the control group. This effect diminished. At 12-month follow-up, the only significant difference between the groups was in the use of stretching. Economic returns of the intervention were calculated in terms of increases in the net present value of production for the society because of the reduction in number of days on sick leave. Net benefits accumulated over 3 years of treating the 237 patients in the intervention group amount to approximately 2,822 dollars per person. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with subacute low back pain, a brief and simple early intervention with examination, information, reassurance, and encouragement to engage in physical activity as normal as possible had economic gains for the society. The effect occurred during the first year after intervention. There were no significant long-term effects of the intervention. The initial gain obtained during the first year does not lead to any increased costs or increased risks for reoccurrence of illness over the next 2 years.

Adolescent↗