Biomedical subjects

Elinor Ben-Menachem

Publications and source records attributed to Elinor Ben-Menachem.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes.

PURPOSE: To assess which antiepileptic medications (AEDs) have the best evidence for long-term efficacy or effectiveness as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. METHODS: A 10-member subcommission of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), including adult and pediatric epileptologists, clinical pharmacologists, clinical trialists, and a statistician evaluated available evidence found through a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents and the Cochrane Library for all applicable articles from 1940 until July 2005. Articles dealing with different seizure types (for different age groups) and two epilepsy syndromes were assessed for quality of evidence (four classes) based on predefined criteria. Criteria for class I classification were a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, >or=48-week treatment duration without forced exit criteria, information on >or=24-week seizure freedom data (efficacy) or >or=48-week retention data (effectiveness), demonstration of superiority or 80% power to detect a <or=20% relative difference in efficacy/effectiveness versus an adequate comparator, and appropriate statistical analysis. Class II studies met all class I criteria except for having either treatment duration of 24 to 47 weeks or, for noninferiority analysis, a power to only exclude a 21-30% relative difference. Class III studies included other randomized double-blind and open-label trials, and class IV included other forms of evidence (e.g., expert opinion, case reports). Quality of clinical trial evidence was used to determine the strength of the level of recommendation. RESULTS: A total of 50 RCTs and seven meta-analyses contributed to the analysis. Only four RCTs had class I evidence, whereas two had class II evidence; the remainder were evaluated as class III evidence. Three seizure types had AEDs with level A or level B efficacy and effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy: adults with partial-onset seizures (level A, carbamazepine and phenytoin; level B, valproic acid), children with partial-onset seizures (level A, oxcarbazepine; level B, None), and elderly adults with partial-onset seizures (level A, gabapentin and lamotrigine; level B, None). One adult seizure type [adults with generalized-onset tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures], two pediatric seizure types (GTC seizures and absence seizures), and two epilepsy syndromes (benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy) had no AEDs with level A or level B efficacy and effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence-based guideline focused on AED efficacy or effectiveness as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. The absence of rigorous comprehensive adverse effects data makes it impossible to develop an evidence-based guideline aimed at identifying the overall optimal recommended initial-monotherapy AED. There is an especially alarming lack of well-designed, properly conducted RCTs for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and for children in general. The majority of relevant existing RCTs have significant methodologic problems that limit their applicability to this guideline's clinically relevant main question. Multicenter, multinational efforts are needed to design, conduct and analyze future clinically relevant RCTs that can answer the many outstanding questions identified in this guideline. The ultimate choice of an AED for any individual patient with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy should include consideration of the strength of the efficacy and effectiveness evidence for each AED along with other variables such as the AED safety and tolerability profile, pharmacokinetic properties, formulations, and expense. When selecting a patient's AED, physicians and patients should consider all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Guidelines--are they useful?

Antiepileptic drug (AED) guidelines are developed to improve medical decision making, to provide guidance and recommendation for patient management, to develop standards to judge or assess clinical practice, and to keep the cost-benefit ratio at an acceptable level. These guidelines are derived from evidence-based medicine (EBM), a four-tiered grading system that is used to analyze clinical trials and published experiments independent of clinical bias and experience. Although guidelines may not answer all questions it is critical that clinicians using them consider the available evidence, as well as the quality of the evidence, when incorporating the information in their decision making.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2006

Management of focal-onset seizures: an update on drug treatment.

Focal-onset seizures are manifestations of abnormal epileptic firing of brain cells in a localised area or areas of the brain. The diagnosis of focal-onset seizures initially entails an EEG, a detailed history from the patient and eyewitnesses, as well as computer tomographic or, preferably, magnetic resonance imaging scans. Video EEG to record ictal events may be necessary to establish the correct diagnosis. Focal seizures are classified according to the International Classification of Epileptic Seizures and International Classification of Epilepsies and Epilepsy Syndromes. It is important to try to decide how the seizure event fits into this system in order to successfully evaluate and optimise treatment, as well as to give detailed information to the patient about their seizures and prognosis. Once the decision to treat the seizures has been made, the physician must choose which medication is the most appropriate to begin with. Carbamazepine, phenytoin or valproic acid (sodium valproate) are often rated as first-line drugs, but factors such as adverse-effect profiles, age, possibility of pregnancy, and concomitant diseases and medication also need to be considered. Most of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) appear to have good efficacy and better tolerability than the older agents, but evidence to support their superiority is scarce and has led to conflicting advice in several guidelines. Among the newer AEDs, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate and oxcarbazepine have obtained monotherapy indication in many countries. The higher costs of the newer AEDs may inhibit their wider use, especially in poorer countries.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2006

Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Additional follow-up results of a pilot study through 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-enhancing effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have been reported during 6 months of treatment in a pilot study of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data through 1 year of VNS (collected from June 2000 to September 2003) are now reported. METHOD: All patients (N = 17) met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable AD. Responder rates for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were measured as improvement or absence of decline from baseline. Global change, depressive symptoms, and quality of life were also assessed. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels for total tau, tau phosphorylated at Thr181 (phosphotau), and Abeta42 were measured by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: VNS was well tolerated. After 1 year, 7 (41.2%) of 17 patients and 12 (70.6%) of 17 patients improved or did not decline from baseline on the ADAS-cog and MMSE, respectively. Twelve of 17 patients were rated as having no change or some improvement from baseline on the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC+). No significant decline in mood, behavior, or quality of life occurred during 1 year of treatment. The median change in CSF tau at 1 year was a reduction of 4.8% (p = .057), with a 5.0% increase in phosphotau (p = .040; N = 14). CONCLUSION: The results of this study support long-term tolerability of VNS among patients with AD and warrant further investigation.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Topiramate monotherapy in epilepsy and migraine prevention.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this review were to assess the efficacy of topiramate as monotherapy for epilepsy and migraine prevention, describe how it should be used, and give clinical advice on how to manage the practical aspects of dosing, titration, and possible adverse events in these 2 indications. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and BIOSIS databases using the key words topiramate, epilepsy, and migraine from the year 1987 onward, and subsequently focused the search on larger controlled trial studies of topiramate as monotherapy. RESULTS: Studies have evaluated the use of topiramate as monotherapy in the treatment of partial-onset and generalized seizures and in the prevention of migraine. In a randomized study, 75% of epilepsy patients treated with 400 mg/d topiramate remained seizure free at 1 year. Patients in the same study treated with a lower dose of topiramate (50 mg/d) also experienced notable seizure reductions, with 59% of patients free of seizures at 1 year. A comparison trial of topiramate (100 or 200 mg/d), valproate, and carbamazepine found that topiramate was associated with a similar time to first posttreatment seizure as the other 2 agents (P = NS). Trials of topiramate monotherapy in migraine prevention found that 100 mg/d was associated with a > or =50% reduction in monthly migraine frequency in 49% to 54% of patients. The migraine prevention trials typically used a starting dose of 25 mg/d, with weekly increases of 25 mg and an initial monotherapy target dose of 100 mg/d. The most common adverse events associated with topiramate are paresthesia, weight loss, and other centrally mediated symptoms, many of which may be ameliorated by proper titration and dosing and by good communication between physician and patient. CONCLUSIONS: Data from controlled trials suggest that 100 mg/d topiramate as monotherapy is effective in the treatment of partial-onset and generalized seizures and in the prevention of migraine.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2005

Topiramate reduces AMPA-induced Ca(2+) transients and inhibits GluR1 subunit phosphorylation in astrocytes from primary cultures.

Topiramate (TPM) is a structurally novel broad spectrum anticonvulsant known to have a negative modulatory effect on the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)/kainate subtypes of glutamate receptors and some types of voltage-gated Na(+) and Ca(2+) channels, and a positive modulatory effect on some types of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptors and at least one type of K(+) channels in neurons. In an earlier work, we showed that the negative modulatory effect of TPM (100 mum) on AMPA/kainate receptors in neurons is dependent on TPM modulation of the phosphorylation state of these receptors. In this work, we investigated the effect of TPM on AMPA-induced intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) responses in cultured rat cortical astrocytes, with special interest in intracellular mechanisms. Here, we report that the ability of TPM (1-100 mum) to inhibit AMPA-induced accumulation of Ca(2+) in astrocytes is inversely related to the level of protein kinase A (PKA) -mediated phosphorylation of channels activated by AMPA. The level of receptor phosphorylation was further determined with western blot using phosphorylation specific antibodies that recognize the glutamate receptor 1 (GluR1) subunit phosphorylated on Ser845. These results demonstrated that, even in cultured cortical astrocytes, TPM significantly reduced the phophorylation level of GluR1 subunits. Furthermore, it was shown that TPM binds to AMPA receptors in the dephosphorylated state and thereby exerts an allosteric modulatory effect on the ion channel.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

VNS Therapy versus the latest antiepileptic drug.

Pro AED: The central issue in medical decision-making is risk-benefit assessment. Surgery of any type is still considered to be a major undertaking. To warrant these risks, the patient has a right to expect that they have a greater chance of a good outcome with an invasive therapy than with a non-invasive one. The main question is when, if ever, this becomes the case when comparing implantation of a VNS Therapy System versus adding an antiepileptic drug (AED)? After the first drug? The second? After all AEDs have failed? To date, no randomized trial comparing the addition of an AED against vagus nerve stimulation (VNS Therapy) has been undertaken, although several are currently being contemplated. Without this information, it is more difficult to make a case for early implementation of VNS Therapy. Unfortunately, few data are available regarding the potential for patients to become seizure-free after implantation of a VNS Therapy System. Another issue is side effects. It is important to remember that VNS Therapy also produces adverse events, albeit very different in character than those associated with AEDs, to which physicians have become accustomed. These include cough, dyspnea, pharyngitis, voice alteration and sleep apnea. A less frequently discussed, potentially negative consequence of VNS Therapy relates to the ability to obtain imaging of the patient. Patients who have undergone VNS Therapy System implantation are not candidates for imaging of the chest, breast, or abdomen. A second issue is that imaging of the brain can only be performed with MRI scanners that meet certain requirements, and as MRI technology develops, scanners meeting these requirements may become harder to find. However, to summarize, VNS Therapy is an excellent and useful treatment choice. Fortunately, the choice between AEDs and VNS Therapy is not an "either/or" decision. Each has a role in the treatment of patients with epilepsy, and the advantages and disadvantages of each should be kept in perspective. Pro VNS Therapy: VNS Therapy is no longer a new treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. The first implant was performed in l988, and since then more than 30,000 patients have received this therapy. It is no longer considered an unusual or dangerous procedure, but it is still used almost exclusively for refractory epilepsy patients and it has not been generally accepted for use as a first line or even second line therapy. However, compared to the new AEDs, VNS Therapy has similar efficacy results in clinical trials and in many epilepsy syndromes and the long-term efficacy results are even more positive, with continued improvement in seizure reduction for up to two years. Two of the major reasons for not using VNS Therapy early are that it is a surgical procedure, and its safety during MRI procedures, especially with 3 Tesla, has not yet been elucidated. The safety profile of VNS Therapy is very favorable; the side effects being totally different from those seen with AEDs. The most important aspects are that there have been no pharmacological interactions, cognitive or sedative side effects reported, and it is safe for use in all age groups. Side effects are restricted to local irritation, hoarseness, coughing and, in a few cases, swallowing difficulties when the stimulator is on, but these tend to disappear with time. No idiosyncratic side effect has emerged during the 16 years of use. Compliance is guaranteed. The cost of the implantation of the VNS Therapy System, when spread out over 8 years (battery life), is actually less than the cost of using a new AED over an eight-year period, and real savings as regards hospital costs due to seizures can be expected.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2004

Topiramate modulation of kainate-induced calcium currents is inversely related to channel phosphorylation level.

Topiramate (TPM) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum anticonvulsant known to modulate the activity of several ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels in neurons. These include an inhibitory effect on the AMPA and kainate subtypes of glutamate receptors, mixed modulatory effects (usually positive) on some types of GABAA receptors, negative modulatory effects on some types of voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels, and a positive modulatory effect on at least one type of K+ channel. The nature of these effects at the molecular level has not been established, but two previous studies have implicated the phosphorylation state of these receptor/channel complexes as an influencing factor in the activity of TPM. Here, we report that the ability of TPM to inhibit a kainate-induced accumulation of free Ca2+ in cultured neurons from rat cerebral cortex is inversely related to the level of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (cAPK) mediated phosphorylation of kainate-activated receptors/channels. Specifically, when cell cultures were pre-treated with forskolin or dibutyryl cAMP, indirect activators of cAPK, the activity of TPM was abolished, whereas when the cells were pre-treated with H89, an inhibitor of cAPK, the relative activity of TPM was enhanced. The results of this study support the hypothesis that TPM binds to phosphorylation sites on AMPA and kainate receptors, but only in the dephosphorylated state and thereby exerts an allosteric modulatory effect on channel conductance.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Pregabalin pharmacology and its relevance to clinical practice.

Pregabalin is a potent ligand for the alpha-2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels in the central nervous system that exhibits potent anticonvulsant, analgesic, and anxiolytic activity in a range of animal models. In addition, pregabalin has been shown to be a highly effective adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in clinical trials. Potent binding to the alpha-2-delta site reduces depolarization-induced calcium influx with a consequential modulation in excitatory neurotransmitter release. Pregabalin has no demonstrated effects on GABAergic mechanisms. Pregabalin demonstrates highly predictable and linear pharmacokinetics, a profile that makes it easy to use in clinical practice. Absorption is extensive, rapid, and proportional to dose. Time to maximal plasma concentration is approximately 1 h and steady state is achieved within 24-48 h. These characteristics reflect the observed onset of efficacy as early as day two in clinical trials. High bioavailability, a mean elimination half life (t(1/2)) of 6.3 h, and dose-proportional maximal plasma concentrations and total exposures predict a dose-response relationship in clinical practice and allow an effective starting dose of 150 mg/day in clinical practice without need for titration. Administration with food has no clinically relevant effect on the amount of pregabalin absorbed, providing for a dosing regimen uncomplicated by meals. Pregabalin does not bind to plasma proteins and is excreted virtually unchanged (<2% metabolism) by the kidneys. It is not subject to hepatic metabolism and does not induce or inhibit liver enzymes such as the cytochrome P450 system. Therefore, pregabalin is unlikely to cause, or be subject to, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions--an expectation that has been confirmed in clinical pharmacokinetic studies. However, dose adjustment may be necessary in patients with renal insufficiency. Thus, the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles of pregabalin provide a predictable basis for its use in clinical practice.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Levetiracetam reduces caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients and epileptiform potentials in hippocampal neurons.

The effect of the novel antiepileptic drug levetiracetam on caffeine (10 mM)-induced intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) response was investigated in rat hippocampal neurons in culture, with the aim of exploring the cellular mechanisms of this new drug. Levetiracetam significantly reduced caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i) response, with maximum inhibition at 32 microM. The R-enantiomer of levetiracetam, ucb L060, which is devoid of anticonvulsant activity, at 32 microM had no effect on caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i) response. Caffeine 10 mM also induced epileptiform field potentials in rat hippocampal slices : single stimuli evoked repetitive population spikes and spontaneous field bursts regularly occurred. Levetiracetam (32 microM) significantly inhibited the amplitudes and the number of caffeine-induced repeated population spikes and delayed the appearance of spontaneous bursts, while ucb L060 (32 microM) completely lacked anti-caffeine activity. These results suggest that the inhibition of caffeine-induced Ca release from intra-neuronal stores might be an excitability-reducing effect of levetiracetam, contributing to its antiepileptic activity.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Adjunctive therapy versus alternative monotherapy in patients with partial epilepsy failing on a single drug: a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of alternative monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy in partial epilepsy refractory to single antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label study, patients with cryptogenic or symptomatic partial epilepsy not controlled after single or sequential AED monotherapies were randomised to monotherapy with an alternative AED or to adjunctive therapy with a second AED. The AED to be added/substituted and dose adjustments were determined by the physician's best judgement. Patients were followed up until withdrawal from the allocated treatment or for 12 months, whichever first. Outcome measures included proportion of patients continuing on the assigned treatment strategy, proportion of patients seizure-free after achieving the target maintenance dose, and adverse effects rates. Data were analysed by actuarial life tables, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Of a total of 157 patients (including 94 previously exposed to only one AED), 76 were randomised to alternative monotherapy and 81 to adjunctive therapy. The two groups were balanced in clinical characteristics. The 12-month cumulative probability of remaining on the assigned treatment was 55% in patients randomised to alternative monotherapy and 65% in those randomised to adjunctive therapy (P=0.74). The 12-month probability of remaining seizure-free was 14 and 16%, respectively (P=0.74). Adverse effects were similar in the two groups. No significant differences in outcome within or between groups were identified based on etiology of epilepsy and previous AED exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the low statistical power resulting from the relatively small sample size, alternative monotherapy and adjunctive therapy were associated with similar outcomes. Further work is required to determine whether outcome could be improved through identification of specific AED combinations with synergistic activity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Evidence for sustained efficacy of levetiracetam as add-on epilepsy therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term clinical usefulness of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra((R))(1)) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Data for all 1422 patients with refractory epilepsy treated with LEV during the development program were analyzed for changes in seizure frequency per week, seizure freedom, and adverse events. RESULTS: Median percent reduction from baseline in seizure frequency per week over the whole treatment period was 39.6%, and no decrease over time was observed within each cohort exposed to LEV for durations ranging from 6 to 54 months. The median treatment period was 399 days (range 1-8 years). The proportion of responders during the first 3 months of LEV treatment was 39.2%. This proportion remained stable at 6 months (36.1%). Overall, 38.6 and 20.1% of patients had reductions in seizure frequency of at least 50 and 75%. Sixty-five (4.6%) patients were seizure-free over their entire treatment period, compared with 167 (11.7%) and 126 (8.9%) during their last 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Ninety-seven (19.8%) of 491 patients who received only one other antiepileptic drug (AED) in addition to LEV were seizure-free during their last 6 months. The proportion of patients who reduced their number of concomitant AEDs was 14.4% (205 patients), while 5.5% (79 patients) were treated with LEV only at the end of follow-up. Accidental injury (28.0%), infection (26.6%), headache (25.8%), somnolence (23%), asthenia (22.6%), and dizziness (18.9%) were among the most common adverse events. CONCLUSION: LEV offers sustained efficacy in patients with refractory partial seizures, and its long-term tolerability is similar to that seen in the short-term placebo-controlled trials.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Topiramate protects against glutamate- and kainate-induced neurotoxicity in primary neuronal-astroglial cultures.

Potential neuroprotective effects of the antiepileptic drug (AED) topiramate (TPM) were evaluated using primary neuronal-astroglial cultures or astroglial-enriched cultures from newborn rats exposed to excitotoxic concentrations of glutamate (Glu) or kainate. Neurons expressed functional Glu receptors of the NMDA and AMPA/kainate types as evaluated by immunocytochemistry and Ca(2+) imaging. When Glu (10 mM) was added to 9-10-day cultures incubated with the fluorescent dye calcein/AM for 5h, there was a marked cell loss in both culture types, but was more pronounced in the neuronal-astroglial cultures. When TPM (5-10 microM) was included in the medium together with Glu, the amount of surviving cells was significantly higher in the neuronal-astroglial cultures, but not in the astroglial-enriched cultures. Immuno-labeling of the cultures revealed an enhanced survival of MAP positive neuronal cells when TPM was included in the Glu containing medium. As TPM has a proven negative modulatory effect on kainate activated receptors, neuronal-astroglial cultures were further exposed to excitotoxic concentrations of kainate (100 microM) and analyzed immunohistochemically. Significantly more MAP positive neurons survived in the TPM containing medium and showed a morphology similar to untreated cells. Valproate and phenytoin were used as reference AEDs. In conclusion, our results demonstrate a protective effect of TPM upon neuronal cells in primary culture, exposed to excitotoxic levels of Glu or kainate.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam during 1-year follow-up in patients with refractory epilepsy.

PROBLEM: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug shown to be effective for the treatment of partial seizures in pivotal clinical trials. We investigated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of LEV as add-on therapy, regardless of seizure type, especially in persons who would not be eligible for clinical trials due to factors such as mental retardation and concomitant psychiatric disorders. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients participated and were followed for 1 year. Demographic data, seizure frequency, and side effects were recorded at baseline and during the 1-year follow-up. The first 35 patients were given LEV at a starting dose of 500 mg b.i.d. with weekly increments of 1000 mg (fast titration). The other patients were given LEV with a starting dose of 250 mg b.i.d. with weekly increments of 250 mg (slow titration). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were completely seizure free after titration to effective dose and 57 were responders with >50% seizure reduction for the first year. In the group with generalized seizures, 1 out of 19 became seizure free, but 8 patients had >50% decrease. Average dose at 1 year was 1900 mg (+/-900). Seventeen of 38 discontinuations were due to adverse effects and 21 were due to lack of efficacy. With fast titration, 15 out of 35 (43%) experienced tiredness during the first 12 weeks, and with slower titration 20 of 63 (32%) experienced tiredness. The difference was not statistically significant. Four out of the five patients who discontinued due to behavioral adverse events (mainly irritability) previously had behavioral problems and/or mental retardation. One patient discontinued due to psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam appears to be well tolerated in patients with severe epilepsy and shows efficacy in a long-term follow-up. Behavioral adverse events were noted in a small number of patients and occurred mainly in patients who had a history of behavioral disturbance or were mentally retarded. These data from an open population are consistent with the findings of clinical trials.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Novel mechanisms of action of three antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin, tiagabine, and topiramate.

Epilepsy, a functional disturbance of the CNS and induced by abnormal electrical discharges, manifests by recurrent seizures. Although new antiepileptic drugs have been developed during recent years, still more than one third of patients with epilepsy are refractory to treatment. Therefore, the search for new mechanisms that can regulate cellular excitability are of utmost importance. Three currently available drugs are of special interest because they have novel mechanisms of action and are especially effective for partial onset seizures. Vigabatrin is a selective and irreversible GABA-transaminase inhibitor that greatly increases whole-brain levels of GABA. Tiagabine is a potent inhibitor of GABA uptake into neurons and glial cells. Topiramate is considered to produce its antiepileptic effect through several mechanisms, including modification of Na(+)-and/or Ca(2+)-dependent action potentials, enhancement of GABA-mediated Cl- fluxes into neurons, and inhibition of kainate-mediated conductance at glutamate receptors of the AMPA/kainate type. This review will discuss these mechanisms of action at the cellular and molecular levels.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2003

Predictors of weight loss in adults with topiramate-treated epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: We examined predictors of weight loss with topiramate, an anticonvulsant associated with weight loss in adults. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In this uncontrolled, prospective clinical trial, topiramate was added to existing anticonvulsants in adults (40 to 110 kg) with partial-onset seizures. Primary measurements were change from baseline weight after 3 months and 1 year in patients completing 1 year of topiramate treatment (N = 38). Physiological and metabolic measures were analyzed for correlation with weight loss during topiramate treatment. RESULTS: In patients who completed 1 year of topiramate treatment, baseline weight was reduced in 82% at 3 months and in 86% at 1 year. Mean body weight was reduced 3.0 kg (3.9% of baseline) at 3 months and 5.9 kg (7.3%) at 1 year. In obese patients [body mass index (BMI) >/= 30 kg/m(2)], mean weight loss was 4.2 kg (4.3%) at 3 months and 10.9 kg (11.0%) at 1 year. Weight loss was primarily caused by reduction in body fat mass. For all patients, weight loss at 3 months correlated most strongly with reduced caloric intake (p = 0.02). At 1 year, caloric intake had returned to baseline levels; weight loss correlated most strongly with higher baseline BMI (p = 0.0007). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that weight loss occurs in most adults treated with topiramate and is sustained for at least 1 year. Reduced caloric intake may account, in part, for weight loss during early treatment. The pattern of weight loss differs according to baseline BMI, with obese patients experiencing greater weight loss during continued therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Levetiracetam: treatment in epilepsy.

A large number of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have become available over the last 10 years. Results from placebo-controlled clinical trials and community-based practice have demonstrated that levetiracetam has a broad spectrum of activity in suppressing seizures as add-on treatment and monotherapy and that it is safe and well-tolerated. Levetiracetam also has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile characterised by rapid and nearly complete absorption, very low potential for drug interactions and a prolonged pharmacodynamic effect that permits twice-daily dosing. Although, the mechanism of action of levetiracetam is not completely understood, preclinical studies suggest that it may have antiepileptogenic and neuroprotective effects, with the potential to slow or arrest disease progression.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2003

Preliminary efficacy of levetiracetam in monotherapy.

The standard of care for prescribing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has come to favor the use of monotherapy when possible; i.e., when compa-rable efficacy can be achieved with fewer risks of adverse events and drug interactions. Most patients with epilepsy are started on one of the classic AEDs and, if it proves ineffective, another drug is tried, usually as monotherapy. While most of the newer AEDs that have come into clinical use in recent years are initially used as add-on therapy, their success at improving seizure control in combination treatments has led to their cautious use as monotherapy even before they have been approved for this indication. As a first study to determine the potential efficacy of levetiracetam in monotherapy, a withdrawal trial model was used. Patients who achieved adequate seizure control with levetiracetam as add-on therapy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study entered a monotherapy phase of the trial in which the baseline AED was gradually withdrawn. Also, long-term data of 505 patients who received levetiracetam for refractory partial seizures were reviewed and found to include 49 patients still treated with levetiracetam monotherapy at the end of the study for a duration between 3 months and 5.5 years. Data from patients in the two trials lend supportive evidence that levetiracetam monotherapy is safe and effective for partial seizures.

Anticonvulsants↗