PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eliot M Rosen

Publications and source records attributed to Eliot M Rosen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Interlaced x-ray microplanar beams: a radiosurgery approach with clinical potential.

Studies have shown that x-rays delivered as arrays of parallel microplanar beams (microbeams), 25- to 90-microm thick and spaced 100-300 microm on-center, respectively, spare normal tissues including the central nervous system (CNS) and preferentially damage tumors. However, such thin microbeams can only be produced by synchrotron sources and have other practical limitations to clinical implementation. To approach this problem, we first studied CNS tolerance to much thicker beams. Three of four rats whose spinal cords were exposed transaxially to four 400-Gy, 0.68-mm microbeams, spaced 4 mm, and all four rats irradiated to their brains with large, 170-Gy arrays of such beams spaced 1.36 mm, all observed for 7 months, showed no paralysis or behavioral changes. We then used an interlacing geometry in which two such arrays at a 90-degree angle produced the equivalent of a contiguous beam in the target volume only. By using this approach, we produced 90-, 120-, and 150-Gy 3.4 x 3.4 x 3.4 mm(3) exposures in the rat brain. MRIs performed 6 months later revealed focal damage within the target volume at the 120- and 150-Gy doses but no apparent damage elsewhere at 120 Gy. Monte Carlo calculations indicated a 30-microm dose falloff (80-20%) at the edge of the target, which is much less than the 2- to 5-mm value for conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery. These findings strongly suggest potential application of interlaced microbeams to treat tumors or to ablate nontumorous abnormalities with minimal damage to surrounding normal tissue.

Animals↗

Regulation of progesterone receptor signaling by BRCA1 in mammary cancer.

Inherited mutations of the BRCA1 gene (chromosome 17q21), a tumor suppressor, lead to an increased risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and several other hormone-responsive tumor types. Over the last ten years, BRCA1 has been found to play major roles in DNA damage signaling, repair, and cell cycle checkpoints. In addition, unfolding evidence suggests that BRCA1 functions as a co-regulator for steroid hormone receptors and modulates steroid hormone action. In this paper, we will briefly review this evidence and present a model to address the role of the progesterone and estrogen receptors in BRCA1 mutant mammary carcinogenesis. Finally, we will consider some of the clinical implications of this model.

Journal Article↗

BRCA1 modulates xenobiotic stress-inducible gene expression by interacting with ARNT in human breast cancer cells.

Previously, we have reported that BRCA1 regulates the expression of various classes of genes, including genes involved in xenobiotic stress responses (Bae, I., Fan, S., Meng, Q., Rih, J. K., Kim, H. J., Kang, H. J., Xu, J., Goldberg, I. D., Jaiswal, A. K., and Rosen, E. M. (2004) Cancer Res. 64, 7893-7909). In the present study, we have investigated the effects of BRCA1 on xenobiotic stress-inducible gene expression. In response to aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, cytoplasmic AhR becomes activated and then translocates to the nucleus where it forms a complex with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT). Subsequently, the AhR.ARNT complex binds to the enhancer or promoter of genes containing a xenobiotic stress-responsive element and regulates the expression of multiple target genes including cytochrome P450 subfamily polypeptide 1 (CYP1A1). In this study, we have found that endogenous and overexpressed exogenous wild-type BRCA1 affect xenobiotic stress-induced CYP1A1 gene expression. Using a standard chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we have demonstrated that BRCA1 is recruited to the promoter regions of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 along with ARNT and/or AhR following xenobiotic exposure. Our findings suggest that BRCA1 may be physiologically important for mounting a normal response to xenobiotic insults and that it may function as a coactivator for ARNT activity. Using immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, and glutathione S-transferase capture assays, a xenobiotic-independent interaction between BRCA1 and ARNT has been identified, although it is not yet known whether this is a direct or indirect interaction. We have also found that the inducibility of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 transcripts following xenobiotic stress was significantly attenuated in BRCA1 knockdown cells. This reduced inducibility is associated with an altered stability of ARNT and was almost completely reversed in cells transfected with an ARNT expression vector. Finally, we have found that xenobiotic (TCDD) treatments of breast cancer cells containing reduced levels of BRCA1 cause the transcription factor ARNT to become unstable.

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator↗

Identification of genes that modulate sensitivity of U373MG glioblastoma cells to cis-platinum.

Scatter factor (hepatocyte growth factor) and its receptor c-Met are increasingly expressed during progression from low-grade to high-grade gliomas. Scatter factor/c-Met signaling induces glioma cell motility, invasion, angiogenesis and resistance to DNA-damaging agents. The latter is relevant to the understanding of the resistance of human gliomas to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The goal of this study was to identify a set of genes that may contribute to scatter factor-mediated protection of U373MG cells against cis-platinum, a DNA cross-linking agent. We used DNA microarray assays, confirmatory semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis and functional assays to identify genes involved in the scatter factor-induced resistance of U373MG to cis-platinum. We identified a group of genes that are overexpressed in cells treated with scatter factor plus cis-platinum relative to cells treated with cis-platinum alone and confirmed some of these gene expression alterations by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Inhibiting the expression of three of these genes--polycystic kidney disease 1, amplified in breast cancer 1 and DEAD/H box helicase 21--using small interfering RNAs reduced survival of cis-platinum-treated cells and partially reversed the scatter factor protection against cis-platinum. Dominant-negative Akt and IkappaB super-repressor expression vectors inhibited the scatter factor protection, and abrogated the ability of scatter factor to alter the expression of DEAD/H box helicase 21 and polycystin (PKD1) within the context of cis-platinum exposure. The Akt and nuclear factor-kappaB inhibitors had no effect on amplified in breast cancer 1 expression. These studies implicate DEAD/H box helicase 21, polycystin (PKD1) and amplified in breast cancer 1 as novel transcription-dependent regulators of scatter factor-mediated glioma cell protection against cytotoxic death, and identify other potential regulators for future study.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

BRCA1 regulates gene expression for orderly mitotic progression.

Germline mutations of the BRCA1 gene confer an increased risk for breast cancer and ovarian cancer. To study the contribution of BRCA1 to sporadic cancers, which often exhibit reduced BRCA1 expression, we tested the effect of knocking down BRCA1 on gene expression in human prostate (DU-145) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cells. DNA microarray and confirmatory RNA analyses revealed that BRCA1 small interfering (si) RNA caused down-regulation of multiple genes implicated in the mitotic spindle checkpoint (eg., BUB1B, HEC, and STK6), chromosome segregation (eg., ESPL1, NEK2, and PTTG1), centrosome function (eg., ASPM), cytokinesis (eg., PRC1, PLK, and KNSL2), and the progression into and through mitosis (eg., CDC2, and CDC20). Cells treated with BRCA1-siRNA showed attenuation of the mitotic spindle checkpoint; but not several G2 checkpoints. Finally, BRCA1 knockdown caused the accumulation of multinucleated cells, suggesting a defect in cytokinesis. We conclude that BRCA1 regulates gene expression for orderly mitotic progression.

BRCA1 Protein↗

The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 regulates progesterone receptor signaling in mammary epithelial cells.

The progesterone receptor (PR) plays roles in normal mammary development and breast cancer formation, where it may exert both stimulatory and inhibitory actions. Previously, the breast cancer susceptibility gene product BRCA1 was found to interact with and inhibit the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha. In this study, we found that exogenous wild-type BRCA1 inhibited the activity of the PR in transient transfection assays utilizing a mouse mammary tumor virus-Luc reporter. Wild-type BRCA1 inhibited the activity of endogenous PR in human breast cancer cells (T47D and MCF-7) and inhibited the activity of exogenous PR-A, PR-B, and [PR-A plus PR-B] isoforms. On the other hand, knockdown of endogenous BRCA1 using small interfering RNA enhanced the progesterone-stimulated activity of the PR by about 4-fold. We documented an in vivo association of the endogenous BRCA1 with PR isoforms A and B and a direct in vitro interaction between BRCA1 and PR, which was partially mapped. Whereas down-regulation of the coactivator p300 contributes to the BRCA1-mediated repression of estrogen receptor-alpha, this mechanism does not contribute to inhibition of PR activity, because exogenous p300 did not rescue the BRCA1 repression of PR activity. The BRCA1-PR interaction has functional consequences. Thus, we showed that BRCA1 inhibits the expression of various endogenous progesterone-responsive genes and inhibits progesterone-stimulated proliferation of T47D cells. Finally, exogenous progesterone caused an exaggerated proliferative response in the mammary glands of mice harboring a mammary-targeted conditional deletion of the full-length isoform of Brca1. These findings suggest that BRCA1 regulates the activity of progesterone, a major hormone of pregnancy that may also participate in mammary carcinogenesis.

Animals↗

Cyclin D1 antagonizes BRCA1 repression of estrogen receptor alpha activity.

The cyclin D1 gene is frequently overexpressed in human breast cancer and is capable of inducing mammary tumorigenesis when overexpressed in transgenic mice. The BRCA1 breast tumor susceptibility gene product inhibits breast cancer cellular growth and the activity of several transcription factors. Herein, cyclin D1 antagonized BRCA1-mediated repression of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha)-dependent gene expression. Cyclin D1 repression of BRCA1 function was mediated independently of its cyclin-dependent kinase, retinoblastoma protein, or p160 (SRC-1) functions in human breast and prostate cancer cells. In vitro, cyclin D1 competed with BRCA1 for ERalpha binding. Cyclin D1 and BRCA1 were both capable of binding ERalpha in a common region of the ERalpha hinge domain. A novel domain of cyclin D1, predicted to form a helix-loop-helix structure, was required for binding to ERalpha and for rescue of BRCA1-mediated ERalpha transcriptional repression. In chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, 17beta-estradiol (E2) enhanced ERalpha and cyclin D1 recruitment to an estrogen response element (ERE). Cyclin D1 expression enhanced ERalpha recruitment to an ERE. E2 reduced BRCA1 recruitment and BRCA1 expression inhibited E2-induced ERalpha recruitment at 12 hours. Cyclin D1 expression antagonized BRCA1 inhibition of ERalpha recruitment to an ERE, providing a mechanism by which cyclin D1 antagonizes BRCA1 function at an ERE. As cyclin D1 abundance is regulated by oncogenic and mitogenic signals, the antagonism of the BRCA1-mediated ERalpha repression by cyclin D1 may contribute to the selective induction of BRCA1-regulated target genes.

Binding, Competitive↗

BRCA1 interaction with human papillomavirus oncoproteins.

Previously, we reported that BRCA1 strongly represses the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) in human breast and prostate cancer cells but only weakly inhibits ER-alpha in cervical cancer cells. We now report that introduction of the human papillomavirus E7 or E6 oncogenes into human papillomavirus-negative cells rescues the BRCA1 repression of ER-alpha activity and that the E7 and E6 oncoproteins interact directly with BRCA1 in vitro and associate with BRCA1 in vivo in cultured cells. This interaction involves at least two contact points on BRCA1, one within an N-terminal site shown previously to interact with ER-alpha and the other in a C-terminal region of BRCA1 containing the first BRCA1 C-terminal domain. Point mutations within the zinc finger domains of E7 and E6 inactivated the binding to the N terminus of BRCA1 and reduced their ability to rescue BRCA1 inhibition of ER-alpha. E6 and E7 also antagonized the ability of BRCA1 to inhibit c-Myc E-box-mediated transactivation and human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter activity, in a manner dependent upon the zinc finger domains. Finally, the ability of E6 and E7 to antagonize BRCA1 did not involve proteolytic degradation of BRCA1. These findings suggest functional interactions of BRCA1 with E7 and E6. The potential significance of these findings is discussed.

BRCA1 Protein↗

BRCA1 regulation of transcription.

BRCA1, a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 17q21, was identified in 1994 based on its linkage to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. The BRCA1 gene encodes a 220 kDa nuclear phosphoprotein. Studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of its tumor suppressor activity have revealed, in part, that BRCA1 participates in the DNA damage response and acts to maintain the integrity of the genome. This activity is generic and does not account for the propensity of BRCA1 mutation carriers to develop specific tumor types rather than a broad spectrum of cancers. In addition to genome maintenance, BRCA1 has been found to broadly regulate gene transcription, even though it is not itself a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor. The ability of BRCA1 to function as a coregulator of transcription may underlie some of its tumor suppressor activity and may explain the tissue-specific nature of this activity. This review will focus on how BRCA1 selectively regulates transcription and how this regulatory function may relate to tumor suppression.

Animals↗

Sensitization of glioma cells to Fas-dependent apoptosis by chemotherapy-induced oxidative stress.

A prominent feature of glioblastoma is its resistance to death from Fas pathway activation. In this study, we explored the modulation of Fas-induced glioblastoma death with chemotherapeutic agents. Camptothecin significantly increased the glioblastoma cell death response to Fas receptor activation regardless of p53 status. Sublethal concentrations of camptothecin reduced the IC50 of agonistic anti-Fas antibody (CH-11) 10-fold, from 500 to 50 ng/mL, in human U87 glioblastoma cells (p53 wild-type). Cell viability in response to camptothecin, CH-11 alone, and the combination of camptothecin + CH-11 was found to be 84%, 85%, and 47% (P < 0.001), respectively. A similar pattern of relative cytotoxicity was found in U373 cells (p53 mutant). We further examined the pathways and mechanisms involved in this apparent synergistic cytotoxic response. Cell death was found to be predominantly apoptotic involving both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways as evidenced by annexin V staining, cleavage of caspases (3, 8, and 9), increased caspase activities, Smac release, and cytoprotection by caspase inhibitors. Expression of Fas-associated death domain, and not Fas, Fas ligand, or caspase proteins, increased following cell treatment with camptothecin + CH-11. Camptothecin treatment enhanced c-jun-NH2-kinase activation in response to CH-11, but inhibition of c-jun-NH2-kinase did not prevent cell death induced by the combination treatment. Reactive oxygen species, especially H2O2, were elevated following camptothecin treatment; and H2O2 enhanced cell death induced by CH-11. The antioxidants glutathione and N-acetyl-cysteine prevented cell death induced by camptothecin + CH-11. These findings show that camptothecin synergizes with Fas activation to induce glioblastoma apoptosis via a mechanism involving reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress pathways.

Antibodies↗

Promotion of mammary cancer development by tamoxifen in a mouse model of Brca1-mutation-related breast cancer.

Loss of full-length Brca1 in mammary epithelial cells of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-Cre Brca1 conditional exon 11 deletion mouse model results in the development of mammary adenocarcinomas with similar genetic changes to those found in human BRCA1-mutation-related breast cancers. We used this experimental model to evaluate the chemopreventive effect of tamoxifen on the development of mammary preneoplasia and adenocarcinoma. No protective effects of tamoxifen administration on mammary cancer development were found. Instead, tamoxifen treatment significantly increased rates of mammary epithelial cell proliferation and the prevalence of mammary hyperplasia at 6 months of age. Tamoxifen-exposed mice developed adenocarcinomas at younger ages than control mice and a higher percentage of mice developed adenocarcinomas by 12 months of age. Both whole mouse and tissue culture cell models were used to test if loss of full-length Brca1 was associated with a relative increase in the agonist activity of tamoxifen. Tamoxifen induced increased ductal growth in MMTV-Cre Brca1 conditional mice compared to wild type. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) expression was downregulated in the tamoxifen-induced hyperplasias. Reducing BRCA1 levels in MCF-7 cells using siRNA resulted in a relative increase in the agonist activity of tamoxifen. Results suggest a model of mammary cancer progression in which loss of full-length Brca1 altered the agonist/antagonist activity of tamoxifen, resulting in tamoxifen-induced mammary epithelial cell proliferation with subsequent loss of ERalpha expression and development of ERalpha-negative hyperplasias and adenocarcinomas.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Structural determinants of the BRCA1 : estrogen receptor interaction.

Previously, we showed that the BRCA1 protein interacts directly and functionally with estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), resulting in the inhibition of estradiol (E2)-stimulated ER-alpha transcriptional activity. The interaction sites were mapped to the N-terminus of BRCA1 (within amino acids (aa) 1-302) and the ligand-binding domain/activation function-2 (LBD/AF-2) region (within aa 282-420) of ER-alpha. In this study, we have further characterized the structure/function relationship for the BRCA1 : ER-alpha interaction. We found that the N-terminal RING domain (aa 20-64) is not required for the BRCA1 : ER-alpha interaction. We identified two separate contact points for ER-alpha, one within aa 1-100 and the other within aa 100-200 of BRCA1; and we showed that each of these BRCA1 peptides interacts with BRCA1 in vitro and in vivo. By using different fragments of the BRCA1 N-terminus, we found that aa 67-100 and 101-133 are required for the interaction with ER-alpha, but that aa 1-67 and 134-302 are dispensible. Previously, we showed that BRCA1 aa 1-302 does not inhibit E2-stimulated ER-alpha transcriptional activity but does bind to ER-alpha and acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length BRCA1 protein. Somewhat surprisingly, we found that BRCA1 aa 1-100 and BRCA1 aa 101-200 (but not aa 201-300) each inhibited ER-alpha activity, although not as efficiently as full-length BRCA1. Mutations within an HIV Rev-like nuclear export signal that resembles a nuclear receptor corepressor motif (aa 86-95) impaired the ability of both truncated (aa 1-100) and full-length (aa 1-1863) BRCA1 proteins to interact with and/or repress ER-alpha activity. Based on these findings, a partial BRCA1 : ER-alpha three-dimensional structure is proposed. The implications of these findings for understanding the BRCA1 : ER-alpha interaction are discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Role of NF-kappaB signaling in hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-mediated cell protection.

The cytokine scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (HGF/SF) protects epithelial, carcinoma, and other cell types against cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by DNA-damaging agents such as ionizing radiation and adriamycin (ADR, a topoisomerase IIalpha inhibitor). We investigated the role of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) signaling in HGF/SF-mediated protection of human prostate cancer (DU-145) and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells against ADR. HGF/SF caused the rapid nuclear translocation of the p65 (RelA) subunit of NF-kappaB associated with the transient loss of the inhibitory subunit IkappaB-alpha. Exposure to HGF/SF caused the activation of an NF-kappaB luciferase reporter that was blocked or attenuated by the expression of a mutant 'super-repressor' IkappaB-alpha. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay supershift assays revealed that HGF/SF treatment induced the transient binding of various NF-kappaB family proteins (p65, p50, c-Rel, and RelB) with radiolabeled NF-kappaB-binding oligonucleotides. The HGF/SF-mediated protection of DU-145 and MDCK cells against ADR (demonstrated using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assays) was abrogated by the IkappaB-alpha super-repressor. The ability of HGF/SF to activate NF-kappaB signaling was dependent on c-Akt --> Pak1 (p21-associated kinase-1) signaling (with Pak1 downstream of c-Akt) and was inhibited by the tumor suppressor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog). Inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase and Src family kinases significantly inhibited HGF/SF-mediated activation of NF-kappaB, while inhibitors of MEK, protein kinase C, and p70 S6 kinase had a modest effect or no effect on NF-kappaB activity. HGF/SF induced the expression of several known NF-kappaB target genes (cIAP-1 (cellular inhibitor of apoptosis-1), cIAP-2, and TRAF-2 (TNF receptor-associated factor-2)) in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner; HGF/SF blocked the inhibition of expression of these genes by ADR. Experimental manipulation of expression of these genes suggests that they (particularly TRAF-2 and cIAP-2) contribute to the protection against ADR by HGF/SF. These findings suggest that HGF/SF activates NF-kappaB through a c-Akt --> Pak1 signaling pathway that is also dependent on Src, and that NF-kappaB contributes to HGF/SF-mediated protection against ADR.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

Regulation of the estrogen-inducible gene expression profile by the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.

The tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 functions in part as a caretaker in preserving the integrity of the genome, but also exhibits tissue-specific function by inhibiting estrogen receptor activity. Because estrogen (E2) induces a wide range of gene expression changes (by nongenomic and several transcriptional pathways), we sought to determine how comprehensive is the BRCA1-mediated inhibition of E2-induced gene expression alterations. Using cDNA-spotted microarrays, we identified a relatively large number of gene expression alterations (both increased and decreased expression) in MCF-7 cells caused by E2, some of which have been reported in previous studies. However, in the presence of exogenous wild-type BRCA1 (wtBRCA1), the response to E2 was severely blunted, with only about 10% the number of gene expression changes as that found in the absence of wtBRCA1. Examples of these findings were confirmed by semiquantitative and quantitative RT-PCR assays. In contrast to wtBRCA1, the induction by E2 of several E2-responsive genes was not inhibited by a full-length tumor-associated mutant BRCA1 protein [T300G (or (61)Cys-->Gly)]. For three E2-responsive genes whose induction by E2 was inhibited by wtBRCA1, wtBRCA1 had little or no effect on the mRNA half-life in the presence of E2. Consistent with these findings, wtBRCA1 inhibited E2-stimulated proliferation of MCF-7 cells, but wtBRCA1 failed to inhibit the proliferation of MCF-7 cells stimulated by IGF-I. Our findings suggest that BRCA1 globally inhibits the response to estrogen in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. The implications of these findings for understanding how BRCA1 may act to restrain E2 action in vivo are considered.

Cell Line, Tumor↗

Regulation of c-Met-dependent gene expression by PTEN.

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) and the tumor suppressor PTEN co-regulate oncogenic cell signaling pathways. How these interactions influence gene transcription is inadequately understood. We used expression microarrays to investigate the effects of PTEN on gene expression changes caused by activating c-Met in human glioblastoma cells. c-Met activation by scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (SF/HGF) altered the expression of 27-fold more genes in PTEN-null U-373MG cells than in PTEN homozygous primary normal human astrocytes (523 vs 19 genes). Restoring wt-PTEN in U-373MG cells dramatically altered patterns of c-Met regulated gene expression. This effect was varied depending on the specific gene in question. PTEN reduced the number of c-Met regulated transcripts from 931 to 502, decreased the relative number of genes upregulated by c-Met from 46 to 25%, and increased the relative number of downregulated genes from 54 to 75%. PTEN and c-Met co-regulated many genes involved in cell growth regulation such as oncogenes, growth factors, transcription factors, and constituents of the ubiquitin pathway. c-Met activation in PTEN-null (but not PTEN reconstituted) cells led to upregulation of the EGFR agonist TGFalpha and subsequently to EGFR activation. Using PTEN mutants, we found that PTEN's transcriptional effects were either lipid-phosphatase dependent, protein-phosphatase dependent, or phosphatase-independent. These results show that PTEN has critical and mechanistically complex effects on RTK-regulated gene transcription. These findings expand our understanding of tumor promoter/suppressor inter-relationships and downstream transcriptional effects of PTEN loss and c-Met overexpression in malignant gliomas.

Blotting, Northern↗

BRCA1 induces antioxidant gene expression and resistance to oxidative stress.

Mutations of the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), a tumor suppressor, confer an increased risk for breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. To investigate the function of the BRCA1 gene, we performed DNA microarray and confirmatory reverse transcription-PCR analyses to identify BRCA1-regulated gene expression changes. We found that BRCA1 up-regulates the expression of multiple genes involved in the cytoprotective antioxidant response, including glutathione S-transferases, oxidoreductases, and other antioxidant genes. Consistent with these findings, BRCA1 overexpression conferred resistance while BRCA1 deficiency conferred sensitivity to several different oxidizing agents (hydrogen peroxide and paraquat). In addition, in the setting of oxidative stress (due to hydrogen peroxide), BRCA1 shifted the cellular redox balance to a higher ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione. Finally, BRCA1 stimulated antioxidant response element-driven transcriptional activity and enhanced the activity of the antioxidant response transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2 like 2 [also called NRF2 (NFE2L2)]. The ability of BRCA1 to stimulate antioxidant response element-dependent transcription and to protect cells against oxidative stress was attenuated by inhibition of nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2 like 2. These findings suggest a novel function for BRCA1, i.e., to protect cells against oxidative stress. This function would be consistent with the postulated role of BRCA1 as a caretaker gene in preserving genomic integrity.

Antioxidants↗

BRCA1 inhibits membrane estrogen and growth factor receptor signaling to cell proliferation in breast cancer.

BRCA1 mutations and estrogen use are risk factors for the development of breast cancer. Recent work has identified estrogen receptors localized at the plasma membrane that signal to cell biology. We examined the impact of BRCA1 on membrane estrogen and growth factor receptor signaling to breast cancer cell proliferation. MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 cells showed a rapid and sustained activation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) in response to estradiol (E2) that was substantially prevented by wild-type (wt) but not mutant BRCA1. The proliferation of MCF-7 cells induced by E2 was significantly inhibited by PD98059, a specific ERK inhibitor, or by dominant negative ERK2 expression and by expression of wt BRCA1 (but not mutant BRCA1). E2 induced the synthesis of cyclins D1 and B1, the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and CDK1, and G(1)/S and G(2)/M cell cycle progression. The intact tumor suppressor inhibited all of these. wt BRCA1 also inhibited epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor I-induced ERK and cell proliferation. The inhibition of ERK and cell proliferation by BRCA1 was prevented by phosphatase inhibitors and by interfering RNA knockdown of the ERK phosphatase, mitogen-activated kinase phosphatase 1. Our findings support a novel tumor suppressor function of BRCA1 that is relevant to breast cancer and identify a potential interactive risk factor for women with BRCA1 mutations.

BRCA1 Protein↗

Pretreatment of indole-3-carbinol augments TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP.

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA. Many anti-tumor agents against prostate cancer cells have been developed, but their unacceptable systemic toxicity to normal tissues frequently limits their usage in clinics. Several previous studies have demonstrated that tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can induce cell death in a variety of transformed cells including prostate cancer cells, but not normal cells. Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), a phytochemical that is produced in fruits and vegetables, may play an important role in the prevention of many types of cancer, including hormone-related ones such as breast and prostate cancer. In this study, we examined the potential sensitizing effects of I3C on TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in a prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP. When LNCaP cells were incubated with I3C (either 30 or 90 microM) for 24 h and then treated with TRAIL (100 ng/ml), enhanced TRAIL-mediated apoptosis was observed. The enhanced apoptosis measured by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase 3 cleavage. We also observed that loss of cell viability after treatment with I3C/TRAIL is greater compared with I3C and TRAIL alone. To determine the molecular mechanisms involved in the enhanced apoptosis, we examined the expression of two TRAIL death receptors (DR4 and DR5) and two TRAIL decoy receptors (DcR1 and DcR2). We found that treatment with I3C induced DR4 and DR5 expression at both transcriptional and translational levels. These findings suggest that I3C may be an effective sensitizer of TRAIL treatment against TRAIL-resistant prostate cancer cell lines such as LNCaP.

Antioxidants↗