PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Elizabeth A Erickson

Publications and source records attributed to Elizabeth A Erickson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Role of heparan sulfate in interactions of Listeria monocytogenes with enterocytes.

Heparan sulfate is known to participate in binding a wide variety of microbes to mammalian cells, but few studies have focused on the enterocyte. Normal human colonic and small intestinal enterocytes, and cultured HT-29 (but not Caco-2) enterocytes, reacted prominently with antibodies specific for heparan sulfate and for the core protein of syndecan-1 (a heparan sulfate proteoglycan). The heparan sulfate analog, heparin, inhibited interactions of Listeria monocytogenes (adherence and internalization) with HT-29, but not Caco-2, enterocytes. Internalization of L. monocytogenes by HT-29 enterocytes was inhibited by heparan sulfate and to a lesser extent by chondroitin sulfate, but not by the non-sulfated glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid. Compared to plasmid control ARH-77 cells, adherence of L. monocytogenes, was increased using ARH-77 cells transfected with syndecan-1 cDNA. Heparin binding protein(s) on L. monocytogenes were confirmed using biotinylated heparin. To determine if these in vitro observations might have in vivo relevance, L. monocytogenes was preincubated with heparin and then orally inoculated into mice. Compared to L. monocytogenes not pretreated with heparin, L. monocytogenes pretreated with heparin was associated with decreased extraintestinal dissemination to the mesenteric lymph nodes and liver of orally inoculated mice. Thus, heparan sulfate (possibly as the heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan-1) appears to participate in interactions of L. monocytogenes with enterocytes.

Animals↗

Effect of lipopolysaccharide on virulence of intestinal candida albicans.

BACKGROUND: Candida albicans is a polymorphic fungus that frequently causes systemic infection in postsurgical and trauma patients. Others have reported that Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) acts as a copathogen to enhance the virulence of parenteral C. albicans. Experiments were designed to clarify the effect of parenteral LPS on systemic candidiasis initiated via the oral route. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antibiotic-treated mice were orally inoculated with C. albicans CAF2 (wild-type) or mutant HLC54 (defective in filament formation), and were given 100 microg parenteral LPS 16 h before sacrifice. Separate groups of mice were additionally exposed to intermittent hypoxia prior to LPS. At sacrifice, cecal flora and microbial translocation to the mesenteric lymph nodes were quantified. C. albicans adherence to cultured HT-29 and Caco-2 enterocytes (pretreated with LPS, or calcium-free medium to expose the enterocyte lateral surface, or both) was quantified by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. RESULTS: All mice had high numbers of cecal C. albicans, and LPS was associated with an additional increase in cecal concentrations of HLC54 but not CAF2. Translocation of HLC54, but not CAF2, appeared facilitated by hypoxia, but LPS did not facilitate translocation in any treatment group. Exposure of the lateral surface of cultured enterocytes had no effect on C. albicans adherence, although LPS consistently decreased adherence of both C. albicans strains. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to experiments where systemic candidiasis was initiated by the parenteral route, parenteral LPS did not act as a copathogen in mice with systemic candidiasis initiated by the oral route, and these results might be related to LPS-induced alterations in C. albicans adherence to host enterocytes.

Animals↗

The social consequences of expressive suppression.

At times, people keep their emotions from showing during social interactions. The authors' analysis suggests that such expressive suppression should disrupt communication and increase stress levels. To test this hypothesis, the authors conducted 2 studies in which unacquainted pairs of women discussed an upsetting topic. In Study 1, one member of each pair was randomly assigned to (a) suppress her emotional behavior, (b) respond naturally, or (c) cognitively reappraise in a way that reduced emotional responding. Suppression alone disrupted communication and magnified blood pressure responses in the suppressors' partners. In Study 2, suppression had a negative impact on the regulators' emotional experience and increased blood pressure in both regulators and their partners. Suppression also reduced rapport and inhibited relationship formation.

Adaptation, Psychological↗