Biomedical subjects

Elizabeth Fox

Publications and source records attributed to Elizabeth Fox.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ABT-751 in non-human primates.

PURPOSE: ABT-751 is an orally bioavailable sulfonamide that binds to the colchicine binding site on beta-tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization. The plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of ABT-751, after a short intravenous infusion, were evaluated in a non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) model that is highly predictive of the CSF penetration of drugs in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma and CSF samples were collected over 24 h after 7.5 mg/kg (150 mg/m2) ABT-751 infused over 0.25-0.70 h, and ABT-751 concentrations in plasma and CSF were quantified using a validated HPLC-MS/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and CSF were derived using non-compartmental methods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Plasma disappearance was bi-exponential with a terminal half-life of 13 h. The mean +/- SD clearance was 100 +/- 18 ml/min m2, the mean +/- SD volume of distribution at steady state was 1.3 +/- 0.5 l/kg, and the mean +/- SD mean residence time was 4.6 +/- 1.8 h. The mean +/- SD peak ABT-751 concentration in CSF was 0.26 +/- 0.08 microM, and the mean +/- SD CSF half-life of 1.3 +/- 0.3 h. CSF penetration was limited (mean +/- SD AUC(CSF):AUC(plasma), 1.1 +/- 0.3%) relative to total (protein-bound + free) plasma drug concentrations, but the CSF concentrations approximated the estimated free drug concentrations in plasma.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

A phase 1 study of ABT-751, an orally bioavailable tubulin inhibitor, administered daily for 7 days every 21 days in pediatric patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities, and maximum tolerated dose of ABT-751 administered orally once daily for 7 days, repeated every 21 days. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients who were </=18 years of age, with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, and who were able to swallow capsules were eligible. The starting dose was 100 mg/m(2)/d (n = 3) and was escalated to 130 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), 165 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), 200 mg/m(2)/d (n = 6), and 250 mg/m(2)/d (n = 2) in cohorts of three to six patients. The maximum tolerated dose was determined from dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first treatment cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-four children (median age, 13 years; range, 4-18 years) were enrolled; 23 were evaluable for toxicity. Diagnoses included neuroblastoma (n = 8), sarcomas (n = 8), primary brain tumors (n = 2), Wilms' tumor (n = 2), and other solid tumors (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 sensory and motor neuropathy, grade 3 hypertension, and grade 3 fatigue) were observed in patients enrolled at the 250 mg/m(2)/d dose level. The maximum tolerated dose of ABT-751 administered daily for 7 days every 21 days was 200 mg/m(2)/d. Non-dose-limiting toxicities at the maximum tolerated dose included anemia, fatigue, peripheral sensory neuropathy, abdominal pain, nausea, constipation, anorexia, fever, and weight loss. Myelosuppression was minimal at the maximum tolerated dose. The median number of cycles administered is 2 (range, 1-50). No significant ABT-751-related cumulative toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: ABT-751 is well tolerated in children. The recommended dose for phase 2 trials in solid tumors is 200 mg/m(2)/d administered orally, daily for 7 days every 21 days. This dose is >40% higher than the maximum tolerated dose in adults receiving the same dosing schedule.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in children with refractory solid tumors or neurofibromatosis type I and plexiform neurofibromas.

PURPOSE: This pediatric phase I trial of tipifarnib determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tipifarnib in children with refractory solid tumors and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) -related plexiform neurofibromas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tipifarnib was administered twice daily for 21 days, repeated every 28 days starting at 150 mg/m2/dose (n = 4), with escalations to 200 (n = 12), 275 (n = 12), and 375 (n = 6) mg/m2/dose. The MTD was also evaluated on a chronic continuous dosing schedule (n = 6). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 36 hours after the first dose and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at baseline and steady state for determination of farnesyl protein transferase (FTase) activity and HDJ-2 farnesylation. RESULTS: Twenty-three solid tumor and 17 NF1 patients were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was 200 mg/m2/dose, and dose-limiting toxicities on cycle 1 were myelosuppression, rash, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The 200 mg/m2/dose was also tolerable on the continuous dosing schedule. Cumulative toxicity was not observed in the 17 NF1 patients who received a median of 10 cycles (range, 1 to 32 cycles). The plasma pharmacokinetics of tipifarnib were highly variable but not age dependent. At steady state on 200 mg/m2/dose, FTase activity was 30% compared with baseline, and farnesylation of HDJ-2 was inhibited in PBMCs. CONCLUSION: Oral tipifarnib is well tolerated in children receiving the drug twice daily for 21 days and a continuous dosing schedule at 200 mg/m2/dose, which is equivalent to the MTD in adults. The pharmacokinetic profile of tipifarnib in children is similar to that in adults, and at the MTD, FTase is inhibited in PBMC in vivo.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Cytological identification of metastatic epithelial nephroblastoma in pleural fluid: report of a case and review of literature.

Nephroblastoma (Wilms' tumor) is the most common childhood renal tumor and usually presents with a histology and cytology consisting of blastemal, epithelial, and stromal cells. Effusions are not uncommon and may suggest an unfavorable prognosis when containing anaplastic tumor cells. In the present case, we report the cytological appearance of a Wilms' tumor metastatic to the pleura. The effusion consisted primarily of tumor cells demonstrating epithelial differentiation. The tumor cells mostly presented as three-dimensional aggregates in an inflammatory background. Many cystic and tubular structures were identified. The tumor cells demonstrated strong CD56 and WT1 immunoreactivity. The histology of a subsequent surgical specimen reflected the features seen in cytology.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2005

Phase I study of O6-benzylguanine and temozolomide administered daily for 5 days to pediatric patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This pediatric phase I trial of O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) and temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily schedule for 5 days, every 28 days was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of TMZ when given with a biologically active dose of O6BG and to define the toxicity profile of the combination in children with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients < or = 21 years old with refractory solid tumors were eligible. O6BG was administered intravenously over 60 minutes daily for 5 days. TMZ was administered orally 30 minutes after completion of each O6BG infusion. Starting doses of O6BG and TMZ were 60 mg/m2/d and 28 mg/m2/d, respectively. O6BG was escalated to 90 and 120 mg/m2/d; TMZ was subsequently escalated to 40, 55, 75, and 100 mg/m2/d. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for toxicity. The combination of O6BG and TMZ was tolerable at TMZ doses less than half of the conventional dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression occurred sporadically at all dose levels and was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 100 mg/m2/d of TMZ combined with 120 mg/m2/d O6BG. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed at 120 mg/m2/d O6BG combined with TMZ doses of 55 mg/m2/d and above. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses of O6BG administered with TMZ on a 5-day schedule in children are 120 mg/m2/d of O6BG and 75 mg/m2/d of TMZ. Evidence of activity was observed at these doses. Myelosuppression was the DLT.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin in nonhuman primates.

PURPOSE: Describe and compare the central nervous system pharmacology of the platinum analogues, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin and develop a pharmacokinetic model to distinguish the disposition of active drug from inert platinum species. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Oxaliplatin (7 or 5 mg/kg), cisplatin (2 mg/kg), or carboplatin (10 mg/kg) was given i.v. Serial plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected over 24 hours. Plasma ultrafiltrates were prepared immediately. Platinum concentrations were measured using atomic absorption spectrometry. Areas under the concentration x time curve were derived using the linear trapezoidal method. CSF penetration was defined as the CSF AUC(0-24)/plasma ultrafiltrate AUC(0-24) ratio. A four-compartment model with first-order rate constants was fit to the data to distinguish active drug from inactive metabolites. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD AUCs in plasma ultrafiltrate for oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin were 61 +/- 22, 18 +/- 6, and 211 +/- 64 micromol/L hour, respectively. The AUCs in CSF were 1.2 +/- 0.4 micromol/L hour for oxaliplatin, 0.56 +/- 0.08 micromol/L hour for cisplatin, and 8 +/- 2.2 mumol/L hour for carboplatin, and CSF penetration was 2.0%, 3.6%, and 3.8%, respectively. For oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin, the pharmacokinetic model estimated that active drug accounted for 29%, 79%, and 81% of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate, respectively, and 25%, 89%, and 56% of platinum in CSF, respectively. The CSF penetration of active drug was 1.6% for oxaliplatin, 3.7% for cisplatin, and 2.6% for carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: The CSF penetration of the platinum analogues is limited. The pharmacokinetic model distinguished between active drug and their inactive (inert) metabolites in plasma and CSF.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Review of microdialysis in brain tumors, from concept to application: first annual Carolyn Frye-Halloran symposium.

In individuals with brain tumors, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of therapeutic agents have historically used analyses of drug concentrations in serum or cerebrospinal fluid, which unfortunately do not necessarily reflect concentrations within the tumor and adjacent brain. This review article introduces to neurological and medical oncologists, as well as pharmacologists, the application of microdialysis in monitoring drug metabolism and delivery within the fluid of the interstitial space of brain tumor and its surroundings. Microdialysis samples soluble molecules from the extracellular fluid via a semipermeable membrane at the tip of a probe. In the past decade, it has been used predominantly in neurointensive care in the setting of brain trauma, vasospasm, epilepsy,and intracerebral hemorrhage. At the first Carolyn Frye-Halloran Symposium held at Massachusetts General Hospital in March 2002, the concept of microdialysis was extended to specifically address its possible use in treating brain tumor patients. In doing so we provide a rationale for the use of this technology by a National Cancer Institute consortium, New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy, to measure levels of drugs in brain tissue as part of phase 1 trials.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Zidovudine concentration in brain extracellular fluid measured by microdialysis: steady-state and transient results in rhesus monkey.

We measured zidovudine concentrations in blood, muscle, and brain extracellular fluid (ECF) by microdialysis and in serum ultrafiltrate and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples during a continuous intravenous infusion (15 mg/kg/h) and after bolus dosing (50-80 mg/kg over 15 min) in nonhuman primates to determine whether CSF drug penetration is a valid surrogate for blood-brain barrier penetration. Recovery was estimated in vivo by zero net flux for the continuous infusion and retrodialysis for the bolus dosing. In vivo recovery was tissue-dependent and was lower in brain than in blood or muscle. Mean (+/-S.D.) steady-state blood, muscle, and brain zidovudine concentrations by microdialysis were 112 +/- 63.8, 105 +/- 51.1, and 13.8 +/- 10.4 microM, respectively; and steady-state serum ultrafiltrate and CSF concentrations were 81.2 +/- 40.2 and 14.1 +/- 8.0 microM, respectively. Brain ECF penetration (microdialysis brain/blood ratio) and CSF penetration (standard sampling CSF/serum ratio) at steady state were 0.13 +/- 0.06 and 0.17 +/- 0.02, respectively. With bolus dosing the mean (+/-S.D.) zidovudine area under concentration-time curve (AUC) normalized to a dose of 80 mg/kg was 577 +/- 103 microM. h in blood, 528 +/- 202 microM. h in muscle, and 108 +/- 74 microM. h in brain (brain/blood ratio of 0.18 +/- 0.10) by microdialysis. Serum ultrafiltrate AUC was 446 +/- 72 microM. h and the CSF AUC was 123 +/- 4.7 microM. h (CSF/serum ratio of 0.28 +/- 0.06). In conclusion, recovery was tissue-dependent. CSF and brain ECF zidovudine concentrations were comparable at steady state, and the corresponding AUCs were comparable after bolus injection. Thus, zidovudine penetration in brain ECF and CSF in nonhuman primates is limited to a similar extent, presumably by active transport, as in other species.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Clinical trial design for target-based therapy.

Anticancer drug discovery has shifted from an empiric random screening directed approach to a more rational and mechanistic, target-based approach, which reflects our rapidly expanding knowledge of the pathogenesis of a variety of forms of cancer at the molecular level, providing new targets for drug discovery and development. The clinical development of target-based anticancer drugs will require fundamental changes to the traditional clinical trial design and end points that have been used for conventional cytotoxic drugs. In the phase I and II settings, traditional end points (toxicity and response) may not be suitable for more selective, cytostatic target-based agents, and these end points may be replaced by biological or pharmacokinetic end points to define the optimal doses and the therapeutic effects of these drugs on their targets. For phase III trials, measurable clinical benefit will continue to be the primary end point. As our understanding of the complex pathways and networks controlling cell signaling, proliferation, and cell death expands, we must learn how and when to use agents to target specific steps in malignant transformation and proliferation, and we must adapt clinical trial design to test the clinical utility of this promising new class of anticancer drugs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The relationships between delivery agents' physical activity level and the likelihood of implementing a physical activity program.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationships between delivery agents'physical activity characteristics and subsequent adoption of a physical activity promotion program for community implementation. METHODS: Agents responsible for county health promotion in Kansas (n = 91; 94.5% women; mean age = 43.0 +/- 11) completed interviews that assessed physical activity self-efficacy, value, and participation. Subsequent implementation of a physical activity program was monitored. The response rate was 100%. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the agents met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for physical activity, 35% were active but did not meet CDC recommendations, and 10% were inactive. On the basis of logistic regression analysis (Wald statistic = 7.63; p < .05), agents who met recommendations were more likely to adopt the program for their county (69%) than were agents who were less active (41%) and inactive (11%). DISCUSSION: The data suggest that increasing the proportion of delivery agents who meet the CDC recommendations for physical activity could be related with a higher proportion of communities implementing physical activity programs.

Adult↗