Elizabeth J Leslie-Clarkson

PubMed2026

Trio-based GWAS reveals loci associated with different forms of isolated cleft lip.

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are the most common craniofacial birth defect and comprise a diverse group of traits with complex and heterogeneous etiologies. Genetic studies of OFCs typically approach this diversity by stratifying cases into broad diagnostic classes, including cleft lip (CL), cleft palate (CP), and cleft lip with palate (CLP). Although this strategy has yielded important insights into OFC risk, it ignores the phenotypic heterogeneity within each subtype. CL exhibits marked phenotypic variability, involving differences in alveolar involvement, laterality, and sidedness that may reflect distinct etiologies. Given this phenotypic diversity within CL, we assembled a multi-ancestry cohort of 837 nonsyndromic CL case-parent trios with whole-genome sequencing and detailed phenotyping. We performed genome-wide association scans (GWAS) via transmission disequilibrium tests for CL overall and for 14 CL subtypes defined by involvement of the alveolus (with and without), laterality (uni- and bilateral), and sidedness (left and right). We identified four genome-wide significant loci. Two loci, IRF6 and 8q24.21, were both detected in the overall CL GWAS. PLCB1/PLCB4 and MAFB were detected in GWASs of alveolar cleft involvement and CL left sidedness, respectively. These subtype-specific associations were followed by case-only comparisons that reflect the presence or absence of alveolus cleft or left-sided bias of CL to confirm the specificity of the association signal to the particular subtype. Our results provide evidence of within-class CL subtype-specific genetic links for loci previously discussed in the context of primary OFC classes and demonstrate the value of granular OFC subtype characterization to capture trait-specific associations.

Alveolus Cleft↗

PubMed2026

Comprehensive analysis of de novo variants across 2,497 orofacial cleft trios reveals novel genetic drivers of disease.

BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts (OFCs) and other palate abnormalities (PAs) are among the most common birth defects worldwide and are characterized by the abnormal formation of the lip and/or palate. Genetic studies have traditionally classified OFC cases as either syndromic, involving OFCs alongside other congenital anomalies, or nonsyndromic, which represent the majority of cases and occur in isolation. Emerging genomic evidence indicates that genes traditionally associated with syndromic forms of OFC can also harbor variants contributing to isolated cases, challenging the notion of a strict dichotomy between these categories and supporting their integration for gene discovery. METHODS: In this study, we applied multiple analytic approaches to characterize the genetic architecture of OFC and PAs by integrating genomic data from 2,497 trios with probands diagnosed with an OFC (n=2,080) or PA (n=417). We compared these findings across OFC subtypes and syndromic status with those from 5,515 control trios to identify enriched biological pathways and mechanisms and to prioritize candidate genes using variant burden testing. RESULTS: We observed a significant enrichment of de novo protein-truncating and damaging missense variants in cases compared to controls (OR = 2.17, p = 1.21×10-32), with particularly strong signals in biologically relevant gene sets involving OFC-associated, constrained, Mendelian disorder, and mouse candidate genes. Variant burden testing identified 39 OFC risk genes at FDR ≤ 0.05, which we then integrated with 593 established OFC genes to interrogate the functional underpinnings of OFC via network analysis. This analysis revealed 309 high-order interactor genes not previously associated with OFC. Notably, this OFC network clustered into ten distinct biological pathways, with nucleosome-associated genes showing significant enrichment among cases in our cohort (OR = 14.8, p = 8.1×10-4). In a final integrative step, we combined evidence across all analyses to nominate 231 candidate genes, 32 of which contained at least two deleterious de novo variants in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the value of integrating diverse OFC and PA subtypes, syndromic status, and variant classes to elucidate the genetic architecture of these disorders, highlighting both phenotypic expansion of known disease genes and the emergence of novel gene-phenotype associations.

De Novo Variant Enrichment↗