PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Elke De Valck

Publications and source records attributed to Elke De Valck.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of cognitive arousal on sleep latency, somatic and cortical arousal following partial sleep deprivation.

Emerging research has shown that sleepiness, defined as the tendency to fall asleep, is not only determined by sleep pressure and time of day, but also by physiological and cognitive arousal. In this study we evaluated (i) the impact of experimentally induced cognitive arousal on electroencephalogram (EEG) defined sleep latency, and subjective, somatic and cortical arousal, and (ii) whether experimentally induced cognitive arousal enhances performance on a driving simulator test. Twelve healthy sleepers each spent three nights and the following day in the sleep laboratory: an adaptation, a cognitive arousal and a neutral testing day. In the cognitive arousal condition, a visit of a television camera crew took place and subjects were asked to be interviewed. On each testing day, a 5-min heart rate recording, subjective sleepiness and arousal scales, Multiple Sleep Latency Test and a 25-min driving simulator task were scheduled three times at 2-h intervals. Experimentally induced cognitive arousal resulted in significant increases in objective sleep latency. Significantly elevated levels of subjective and somatic arousal--as indexed by a subjective arousal scale and heart rate--were also evidenced following cognitive arousal induction. A marginally significant trend for increased cortical arousal, measured by EEG beta activity, was also found. No effects were found on driving simulator performance. These findings support the concept of cognitive arousal as a significant component in determining sleep latency. In addition, it was illustrated that cognitively induced arousal can provoke increases in somatic and possibly even cortical arousal in normal sleepers. However, this was not accompanied by an enhanced ability to perform adequately on a driving simulator test.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Effects of slow-release caffeine and a nap on driving simulator performance after partial sleep deprivation.

A driving simulator was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a 30-min. nap and 300-mg slow-release caffeine as countermeasures to drivers' sleepiness induced by partial sleep deprivation. 12 participants were allowed 45 hr. time in bed at the laboratory. Driving performance then was measured twice--at 9 a.m. and at 1 p.m.--by a 45-min. driving task on a simulator. Subjective sleepiness/alertness and mood were assessed four times on the Stanford Sleepiness Scale and the Profile of Mood States. Driving performance was assessed as Lane Drifting, Speed Deviation, and Accident Liability. A 30-min. nap opportunity and 300 mg of slow-release caffeine both were successful in counteracting drivers' sleepiness. The remedial effect of slow-release caffeine lasted longer than that of the nap, that is, it was also effective in the afternoon session. This suggests that slow-release caffeine represents a valuable countermeasure that, in the case of partial sleep deprivation, is preferred to a nap when sleepiness has to be counteracted for a longer time.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Daytime sleepiness and its evaluation.

Basic models of sleepiness, focusing on the homeostatic and circadian components of sleepiness, are able to predict important fluctuations of sleepiness. However, they fail in explaining certain sleepiness phenomena, as for instance in insomnia patients. To meet this shortcoming, modern models incorporate the arousal component of sleepiness, in addition to the sleep drive. While these models mainly concentrate on short-term changes in sleepiness, "state" sleepiness, there are indications that a stable characteristic level of sleepiness, "trait" sleepiness, is also an important determinant of a person's level of sleepiness. This leads to a conceptualization of sleepiness in which situational factors modify a basal level of sleep drive and arousal. It implies that sleepiness is not a unitary concept and can reflect essentially different states. Multiple sleepiness assessment tools have been proposed in the past. The majority of them offer valuable information, but they do not grasp all aspects of sleepiness. We should bear in mind that tools for assessing sleepiness are always operationalizations reflecting the theoretical framework the investigator has on sleepiness. Hence, rather than searching for a gold standard for the measurement of sleepiness, future research effort should be aimed at linking the various measurement techniques with the hypothesized underlying components of sleepiness on a sound empirical basis.

Arousal↗