PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ellen M Berends

Publications and source records attributed to Ellen M Berends.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Adaptation to the induced effect stimulus normalizes surface slant perception and recalibrates eye position signals for azimuth.

A frontoparallel plane viewed with unequal vertical magnification of the two ocular images appears rotated about a vertical axis (i.e., induced effect; Ogle, 1938). Several experiments were conducted to investigate changes in the visual system that occurred after adapting to the induced effect. Adaptation at 57 cm was tested using tall stimuli at various viewing distances to test for the adaptation of vertical size ratio (VSR) information and normalization of the slant percept. When aftereffects were expressed in units of slant, they were larger at 57 cm than other test distances and were not significantly different from each other at other distances. Short stimuli were used to test adaptation of eye position signals for azimuth. The aftereffects were in the opposite direction to those measured with tall stimuli. The combined results suggest that the visual system normalizes slant percepts based on the surface slant of the adaptation stimulus and when there is a conflict between VSR signals and eye position cues for azimuth that the primary eye position signal for azimuth is recalibrated toward the direction indicated by the binocular differential vertical magnification in the adaptation stimulus.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Stereo-slant adaptation is high level and does not involve disparity coding.

We have investigated the potential stages of visual processing at which adaptation may occur to a slanted surface produced by horizontal magnification. Predictions of three hypotheses were tested utilizing a property of depth from binocular disparity, namely that slant scales with distance. If adaptation occurs at the disparity level, then the after-effect expressed in units of horizontal magnification will be independent of the test distance. If adaptation occurs at either a perceived slant or mapping level, then the after-effect, expressed in units of slant, will be independent of the test distance. If adaptation is contingent on distance, then the after-effect will not transfer over distance. Subjects adapted to a stereo-defined slanted surface at a distance of 57 cm. The after-effect was measured with a test stimulus at a distance of 28, 57, 85, or 114 cm by means of a nulling method. When the after-effect was expressed in units of slant, we found that it was larger at the adapting distance than other test distances, and that the after-effect was constant at test distances different from the adaptation distance. These results suggest that two types of adaptation occurred, namely adaptation on a mapping/perception level and adaptation contingent on distance.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Eye movements facilitate stereo-slant discrimination when horizontal disparity is noisy.

Conditions in which saccadic gaze shifts within planar surfaces facilitate stereo-slant discrimination for slant about the horizontal and vertical axis were investigated. When horizontal disparity noise was added, large gaze shifts in the direction of the slant lowered stereo-slant discrimination thresholds compared to thresholds measured with steady central fixation, whereas eye movements orthogonal to the slant orientation did not lower slant-discrimination thresholds. When no horizontal noise was added, performance was the same with and without gaze shifts. These results suggest that slant is recovered from depth differences between target edges when horizontal disparity signals are variable and that foveal fixation improves the measures of disparity. Eye movements did not lower slant thresholds by providing multiple foveal samples of slant at different target locations that were averaged to reduce disparity noise levels, because eye movements only lowered the thresholds when there was a depth difference between the fixation points. To study which signals for azimuth are used when slant is recovered from the difference in depth between target edges, vertical disparity noise was added and stimulus height was reduced. Both methods elevated slant-discrimination thresholds when horizontal disparity noise was present, suggesting that vertical disparity is used as a cue for azimuth.

Depth Perception↗

Thresholds for stereo-slant discrimination between spatially separated targets are influenced mainly by visual and memory factors but not oculomotor instability.

Surface-slant variations can be sensed either simultaneously with steady fixation or sequentially with saccadic gaze shifts. Stereo-slant discrimination thresholds are affected by visual, oculomotor, and memory factors. We have investigated the effects of fixation strategy, target separation, and exposure duration on stereo-slant discrimination. With long exposure durations (734 ms), stereo-slant discrimination thresholds measured with simultaneous presentation of test and reference stimuli were lower with gaze shifts than without them when target separations exceeded 4 deg. Above 4-deg target separations, the benefits of improved disparity resolution with foveal gaze shifts outweighed the costs of oculomotor variability associated with saccades. With short exposure durations (167 ms), as target separation increased, stereo-slant discrimination thresholds measured without gaze shifts increased with both sequential and simultaneous stimulus presentations, whereas thresholds with gaze shifts remained constant. This indicates that oculomotor errors are not an important factor in stereo-slant discrimination. In contrast to stereo-slant thresholds, sequential stereo-depth thresholds between two dots, measured with gaze shifts, increased with target separation. Thus, oculomotor error increases with target separation, and it is an important factor in stereo-depth discrimination.

Depth Perception↗

Vertical disparity can alter perceived direction.

It has been well established that vertical disparity is involved in perception of the three-dimensional layout of a visual scene. The goal of this paper was to examine whether vertical disparities can alter perceived direction. We dissociated the common relationship between vertical disparity and the stimulus direction by applying a vertical magnification to the image presented to one eye. We used a staircase paradigm to measure whether perceived straight-ahead depended on the amount of vertical magnification in the stimulus. Subjects judged whether a test dot was flashed to either the left or the right side of straight-ahead. We found that perceived straight-ahead did indeed depend on the amount of vertical magnification but only after subjects adapted (for 5 min) to vertical scale (and only in five out of nine subjects). We argue that vertical disparity is a factor in the calibration of the relationship between eye-position signals and perceived direction.

Adaptation, Physiological↗