Biomedical subjects

Ellen Yorke

Publications and source records attributed to Ellen Yorke.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Respiratory gating for liver tumors: use in dose escalation.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical impact of the Varian Real-Time Position Monitor (RPM) respiratory gating system for treatment of liver tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with liver tumors were selected for evaluation of this passive system, which tracks motion of reflective markers mounted on the abdomen with an infrared-sensitive camera. At simulation, a fluoroscopic movie, breathing trace, and CT scans synchronized at end-expiration (E-E) and end-inspiration were acquired in treatment position using the RPM system. Organs and gross tumor volume were contoured on each CT. Each organ's positional change between two scan sets was quantified by calculation of the center of volume shift and an "index coefficient," defined as the volume common to the two versions of the organ to the volume included in at least one (intersection/union). Treatment dose was determined by use of normal tissue complication probability calculations and dose-volume histograms. Gated portal images were obtained to monitor gating reproducibility with treatment. RESULTS: Eight patients received 177 treatments with RPM gating. Average superior-to-inferior (SI) diaphragm motion on initial fluoroscopy was reduced from 22.7 mm without gating to 5.1 mm with gating. Comparing end-inspiration to E-E CT scans, average SI movement of the right diaphragm was 11.5 mm vs. 2.2 mm for two E-E CT scans. For all organs, average E-I SI organ motion was 12.8 mm vs. 2.0 mm for E-E studies. Index coefficients were closer to 1.0 for E-E than end-inspiration scans, indicating gating reproducibility. The average SI displacement of diaphragm apex on gated portal images compared with DRR was 2.3 mm. Treatment was prolonged less than 10 minutes with gating. The reproducible decrease in organ motion with gating enabled reduction in gross tumor volume-to-planning target volume margin from 2 to 1 cm. This allowed for calculated dose increases of 7%-27% (median: 21.3%) in 6 patients and enabled treatment in 2. CONCLUSION: Gating of radiotherapy for liver tumors enables safe margin reduction on tumor volume, which, in turn, may allow for dose escalation.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Optimization of conformal thoracic radiotherapy using cone-beam CT imaging for treatment verification.

PURPOSE: Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MVCBCT) has been proposed for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy. However, the doses required for such imaging may compromise the quality of the delivered dose distribution. The present paper explores the effect of cone-beam imaging on dose homogeneity and critical organ dose and the use of our new tool, adapted intensity-modulated radiation therapy (AIMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three types of treatment plans were devised (3D-CRT [three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy], IMRT [intensity-modulated radiotherapy], and AIMRT) based on 4 patients with thoracic malignancies. MVCBCT fields were then integrated into the plans. The MVCBCT technique used 21 imaging portals at 10 degrees intervals. The MVCBCT apertures were shaped to conform to the planning target volume with a 6-mm margin. In a second set of plans, the field size was expanded by a further 2 cm. The unoptimized MVCBCT dose distribution was incorporated into the IMRT plan using AIMRT. RESULTS: Normal-tissue complication probability with MVCBCT is acceptable for all plans at the 66.6 Gy level, but exceeds tolerance for both 3D-CRT alone and 3D-CRT with MVCBCT at higher doses. In contrast, the use of AIMRT planning with MVCBCT allowed safe dose escalation to 85 Gy. Expanding the MVCBCT aperture provided better anatomic visibility with an acceptable lung dose. The results using IMRT with MVCBCT fell between the values measured for 3D-CRT and AIMRT with MVCBCT. CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to demonstrate that MVCBCT can be incorporated into 3D-CRT and IMRT planning with minimal effect on planning target volume homogeneity and dose to critical structures. This paves the way for highly conformal radiotherapy at greater doses delivered with increased confidence and safety.

Computer Graphics↗

PubMed2003

The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be conveniently delivered with a multileaf collimator. With this method, the entire field is not delivered at once, but rather it is composed of many subfields defined by the leaf positions as a function of beam on time. At any given instant, only these subfields are delivered. During treatment, if the organ moves, part of the volume may move in or out of these subfields. Due to this interplay between organ motion and leaf motion the delivered dose may be different from what was planned. In this work, we present a method that calculates the effects of organ motion on delivered dose. The direction of organ motion may be parallel or perpendicular to the leaf motion, and the effect can be calculated for a single fraction or for multiple fractions. Three breast patients and four lung patients were included in this study,with the amplitude of the organ motion varying from +/- 3.5 mm to +/- 10 mm, and the period varying from 4 to 8 seconds. Calculations were made for these patients with and without organ motion, and results were examined in terms of isodose distribution and dose volume histograms. Each calculation was repeated ten times in order to estimate the statistical uncertainties. For selected patients, calculations were also made with conventional treatment technique. The effects of organ motion on conventional techniques were compared relative to that on IMRT techniques. For breast treatment, the effect of organ motion primarily broadened the penumbra at the posterior field edge. The dose in the rest of the treatment volume was not significantly affected. For lung treatment, the effect also broadened the penumbra and degraded the coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). However, the coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) was not much affected, provided the PTV margin was adequate. The same effects were observed for both IMRT and conventional treatment techniques. For the IMRT technique, the standard deviations of ten samples of a 30-fraction calculation were very small for all patients, implying that over a typical treatment course of 30 fractions, the delivered dose was very close to the expected value. Hence, under typical clinical conditions, the effect of organ motion on delivered dose can be calculated without considering the interplay between the organ motion and the leaf motion. It can be calculated as the weighted average of the dose distribution without organ motion with the distribution of organ motion. Since the effects of organ motion on dose were comparable for both IMRT and conventional techniques, the PTV margin should remain the same for both techniques.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams may have strong fluence variations and are advantageous at disease sites such as lung and head and neck (H&N), where neighboring tissues have very different electron densities. We use Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations to evaluate the dosimetric effects of these inhomogeneities for 10 clinical IMRT treatment plans for five lung patients and four H&N patients. All beams are 6 MV photons. "Standard plans" were first produced on a clinical treatment planning system which optimizes beam intensity distributions to meet dose and dose-volume constraints and calculates dose using a measurement-based pencil-beam algorithm with an equivalent pathlength inhomogeneity correction. Patient anatomy and electron densities were obtained from patient-specific CT images. The dose distribution of each beam was recalculated with the MC method, using the same CT images, beam geometry, beam weighting and optimized fluence intensity distributions as the corresponding standard plan. For the lung cases, the MC calculated dose distributions are characterized by reduced penetrations and increased penumbra due to larger secondary electron range in the low-density media, which is not accurately accounted for in the pencil beam algorithm. For the lung cases, the PTV was underdosed; except for one dose-volume index, underdose was less than 10%. Individual H&N fields are affected to different degrees by tissue inhomogeneities, depending on specific anatomy, especially the size and location of air cavities in relation to the beam orientation and field size. For four H&N plans, PTV coverage changed by less than 2%; for the fifth, there was less than 10% difference between the standard and the MC plans. Critical normal tissue DVHs (cord, lung, brainstem) are changed by <10% at the high dose end and mean lung doses are changed by <6%.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.

Many lung cancer patients who undergo radiation therapy are treated with higher energy photons (15-18 MV) to obtain deeper penetration and better dose uniformity. However, the longer range of the higher energy recoil electrons in the low-density medium may cause lateral electronic disequilibrium and degrade the target coverage. To compare the dose homogeneity achieved with lower versus higher energy photon beams, we performed a dosimetric study of 6 and 15 MV three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment plans for lung cancer using an accurate, patient-specific dose-calculation method based on a Monte Carlo technique. A 6 and 15 MV 3D conformal treatment plan was generated for each of two patients with target volumes exceeding 200 cm(3) on an in-house treatment planning system in routine clinical use. Each plan employed four conformally shaped photon beams. Each dose distribution was recalculated with the Monte Carlo method, utilizing the same beam geometry and patient-specific computed tomography (CT) images. Treatment plans using the two energies were compared in terms of their isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The 15 MV dose distributions and DVHs generated by the clinical treatment planning calculations were as good as, or slightly better than, those generated for 6 MV beams. However, the Monte Carlo dose calculation predicted increased penumbra width with increased photon energy resulting in decreased lateral dose homogeneity for the 15 MV plans. Monte Carlo calculations showed that all target coverage indicators were significantly worse for 15 MV than for 6 MV; particularly the portion of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose (V(95)) dropped dramatically for the 15 MV plan in comparison to the 6 MV. Spinal cord and lung doses were clinically equivalent for the two energies. In treatment planning of tumors that abut lung tissue, lower energy (6 MV) photon beams should be preferred over higher energies (15-18 MV) because of the significant loss of lateral dose equilibrium for high-energy beams in the low-density medium. Any gains in radial dose uniformity across steep density gradients for higher energy beams must be weighed carefully against the lateral beam degradation due to penumbra widening.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗