PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ellie M Wekking

Publications and source records attributed to Ellie M Wekking.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Polymorphisms in type 2 deiodinase are not associated with well-being, neurocognitive functioning, and preference for combined thyroxine/3,5,3'-triiodothyronine therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients on levothyroxine replacement display significant impairment in psychological well-being, compared with sex- and age-matched controls. Levothyroxine-treated patients can be assumed to derive T3 exclusively from deiodination of T4, which, in the central nervous system, is regulated by type II deiodinase (DII). OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether two recently identified polymorphisms in the DII gene (DII-ORFa-Gly3Asp and DII-Thr92Ala) are determinants of well-being and neurocognitive functioning and associated with a preference for replacement with a combination of T3 and T4. METHODS: Genotypes for both polymorphisms were determined in 141 patients with primary autoimmune hypothyroidism, adequately treated with levothyroxine monotherapy and participating in a randomized clinical trial comparing T4 therapy with T4/T3 combination therapy. Questionnaires on well-being and neurocognitive tests were performed at baseline. RESULTS: Allele frequencies in patients with primary hypothyroidism were similar to those of healthy blood bank donors (32.0 vs. 33.9% for DII-ORFa-Gly3Asp and 40.4 vs. 38.8% for DII-Thr92Ala). DII polymorphisms were not associated with measures of well-being, neurocognitive functioning, or preference for combined T4/T3 therapy. CONCLUSION: The DII-ORFa-Gly3Asp and DII-Thr92Ala polymorphisms do not explain differences in well-being, neurocognitive functioning, or appreciation of T4/T3 combination therapy in patients treated for hypothyroidism.

Adult↗

Combined therapy with levothyroxine and liothyronine in two ratios, compared with levothyroxine monotherapy in primary hypothyroidism: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Controversy remains about the value of combined treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3), compared with LT4 alone in primary hypothyroidism. We compared combined treatment with LT4 and LT3 in a ratio of 5:1 or 10:1 with LT4 monotherapy. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 141 patients (18-70 yr old) with primary autoimmune hypothyroidism, recruited via general practitioners. Inclusion criteria included: LT4 treatment for 6 months or more, a stable dose for 6 wk or more, and serum TSH levels between 0.11 and 4.0 microU/ml (mU/liter). Randomization groups were: 1) continuation of LT4 (n = 48); 2) LT4/LT3, ratio 10:1 (n = 46); and 3) LT4/LT3, ratio 5:1 (n = 47). Subjective preference of study medication after 15 wk, compared with usual LT4, was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included scores on questionnaires on mood, fatigue, psychological symptoms, and a substantial set of neurocognitive tests. Study medication was preferred to usual treatment by 29.2, 41.3, and 52.2% in the LT4, 10:1 ratio, and 5:1 ratio groups, respectively (chi2 test for trend, P = 0.024). This linear trend was not substantiated by results on any of the secondary outcome measures: scores on questionnaires and neurocognitive tests consistently ameliorated, but the amelioration was not different among the treatment groups. Median end point serum TSH was 0.64 microU/ml (mU/liter), 0.35 microU/ml (mU/liter), and 0.07 microU/ml (mU/liter), respectively [ANOVA on ln(TSH) for linear trend, P < 0.01]. Mean body weight change was +0.1, -0.5, and -1.7 kg, respectively (ANOVA for trend, P = 0.01). Decrease in weight, but not decrease in serum TSH was correlated with increased satisfaction with study medication. Of the patients who preferred combined LT4/LT3 therapy, 44% had serum TSH less than 0.11 microU/ml (mU/liter). Patients preferred combined LT4/LT3 therapy to usual LT4 therapy, but changes in mood, fatigue, well-being, and neurocognitive functions could not satisfactorily explain why the primary outcome was in favor of LT4/LT3 combination therapy. Decrease in body weight was associated with satisfaction with study medication.

Adolescent↗

Cognitive functioning and well-being in euthyroid patients on thyroxine replacement therapy for primary hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: Hypothyroidism is associated with neurocognitive impairment. Sparse data suggest that treatment of hypothyroidism, resulting in a return to euthyroidism, may be associated with only partial recovery of overall neurocognitive functioning. The aim of this study was to assess neurocognitive functioning and well-being in euthyroid patients with primary hypothyroidism on adequate thyroxine (T4) treatment. We also investigated whether serum TSH and thyroid antibodies are determinants of neurocognitive functioning and well-being. DESIGN: We assessed neurocognitive functioning and well-being in 141 patients with primary hypothyroidism. METHODS: Neurocognitive test results and scores on questionnaires measuring well-being of 141 patients were compared with the reference values for these tests as published and used in Dutch clinical neuropsychological practice. Assessment of neurocognitive functioning included tests for cognitive or psychomotor speed, attention, working memory as well as learning and memory. Well-being was measured with the Symptom Check List-90 total score and the Rand 36-item Health Survey subscales for 'mental health' and 'vitality'. RESULTS: Patients showed poor performance on various domains of neurocognitive functioning compared with mean standard reference values, especially on a complex attention task and on verbal memory tests. Levels of well-being were significantly lower for patients compared with those of the general population. Neither serum TSH nor thyroid antibodies were determinants of neurocognitive functioning and well-being. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that neurocognitive functioning as well as psychological well-being may not be completely restored in patients with hypothyroidism, despite T4 treatment.

Adult↗

Suboptimal performance on neuropsychological tests in patients with suspected chronic toxic encephalopathy.

Suboptimal performance during neuropsychological testing can seriously complicate assessment in behavioral neurotoxicology. We present data on the prevalence of suboptimal performance in a group of Dutch patients with suspected chronic toxic encephalopathy (CTE) after long-term occupational exposure to solvents. One hundred and forty-five subjects referred to one of two Dutch national assessment centers for CTE were administered the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), two tests specifically developed for the detection of suboptimal performance. For both tests, very cautious cut-off scores were chosen with a specificity of 99%. Results indicated that suboptimal performance appears to be a substantial problem in this group of patients with suspected CTE after long-term exposure to organic solvents. Only 54% of our subjects obtained normal scores on both tests of malingering, i.e. at or above cut-off score. The two tests seemed to measure the same concept in that nearly all the subjects with low TOMM scores also had low ASTM scores. However, a higher proportion of subjects scored below the cut-off on the ASTM than on the TOMM.

Adult↗

Psychological treatment of patients with chronic toxic encephalopathy: lessons from studies of chronic fatigue and whiplash.

BACKGROUND: Chronic toxic encephalopathy (CTE), which can result from long-term exposure to organic solvents, is characterized by problems of attention and memory, fatigue and affective symptoms. There is little experience with (neuro)psychological treatment in this patient group. We reviewed treatment outcome studies of CTE and comparable syndromes, namely, chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), with a view to providing recommendations for the psychological treatment of patients with CTE. METHODS: PubMed and PsychLIT were systematically searched and reference lists of retrieved articles were studied. The articles were classified according to study design and level of evidence. RESULTS: The studies of CFS provided high-level evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) in challenging dysfunctional cognitions regarding the effectiveness of rest and in stimulating graded activity. The studies of WAD were methodologically weaker, and most evaluated a combination of CBT and graded activity training. There was some evidence that changing fatigue- or pain-related behaviors may result in cognitive improvement. Two uncontrolled studies of CTE evaluated cognitive rehabilitation techniques but yielded inconsistent findings. CONCLUSIONS: CBT techniques focusing on changing illness attributions and on stimulating graded activity might be useful for patients with CTE, diminishing fatigue-related problems of concentration and memory. Future studies should evaluate whether cognitive deficits of CTE patients as a result of neurotoxic effects of exposure should be treated by cognitive rehabilitation.

Chronic Disease↗