PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Emma Suárez

Publications and source records attributed to Emma Suárez.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

An incidental finding during cardiac catheterization.

Coronary artery obstruction during cardiac catheterization is rare. It is a serious complication and has been reported to occur in 0.15 to 0.5% of cases. Thromboembolism, air embolism and coronary dissection have been described as the most common causes of intraprocedural coronary occlusion. Aortic valve masses can also cause coronary obstruction. We report the case of a young woman with a complication and an incidental finding during angiographic procedure. A surgical treatment was needed.

Adult↗

[Percutaneous treatment of thoracic aorta diseases. A multidisciplinary approach].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the experience of a multidisciplinary team in the percutaneous treatment of thoracic aorta disease. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between December 2001 and January 2004, 15 patients were selected for percutaneous treatment at the Thoracic Aorta Unit of the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias. The motives for stent implantation were: degenerative aneurysm (n=7), acute dissection (n=4), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n=1), posttraumatic aneurysm (n=2) and postsurgery pseudoaneurysm (n=1). Four procedures were considered emergencies. Another two patients underwent prior surgery of the supra-aortic branches. Previous computed tomographic angiography and arteriography were performed, and in complex cases of dissection, magnetic resonance imaging was used. All stent placement procedures were performed in the hemodynamics laboratory. All patients underwent computed tomographic angiography during follow-up. RESULTS: Stent positioning was technically successful in 14 patients. The mean length of aortic coverage was 230 +/- 110 mm (range 110-440 mm). No intraoperative deaths occurred. There was one in-hospital death. Transient postimplantation syndrome was presented in three patients. Two type I endoleaks, one type II endoleak and one thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery were found on computed tomographic angiography at one month. One type III endoleak and one type II endoleak were found during subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent-grafting is a valid alternative in the treatment of aortic disease in high-risk patients. Coordination between different medical specialties and appropriate selection of patients are needed. Long-term follow-up is necessary to ensure the usefulness and efficacy of the procedure.

Aorta, Thoracic↗

[Drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary lesions who are not candidates for surgical revascularization].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical revascularization is the treatment of choice in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis. Conventional stents are not a valid alternative because of the rate of restenosis and sudden cardiac death. Drug-eluting stents, which reduce the rate of restenosis, may represent an alternative to cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to describe the results with drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis who were poor candidates for surgical revascularization. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We prospectively followed a consecutive series of patients who were poor candidates for surgical revascularization and were treated with implantation of a drug-eluting stent in the left main coronary artery between May 2002 and April 2004. In-hospital and long-term results were analyzed. Follow-up included angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (25 men, 59.5%) with a mean age of 70.1 (10.5) years were studied. Fourteen (33%) had diabetes, and 7 (16.7%) had a protected left main coronary artery. The reasons for ruling out surgery were poor distal vessels in 19 (45.2%), previous surgery in 9 (21.4%), age in 6 (14.3%), primary angioplasty in 5 (11.4%), and other reasons in 3 (7.2%). Four patients (9.5%) died before discharge, three of them after primary angioplasty. No in-hospital revascularization procedures were needed. Median follow-up time was 288 days; mean follow-up time was 315 (241) days. Another four patients died after discharge (9.5%) on days 5, 24, 34 and 115. Angioplasty was repeated in one patient, and another was referred for heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-eluting stents represent a valid alternative in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis who are poor candidates for surgical revascularization. Randomized studies with a longer follow-up should be performed to evaluate their benefits in patients eligible for surgery.

Adult↗

[Direct stenting in saphenous vein grafts. Immediate and long-term results].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous interventions on saphenous vein grafts are associated with a worse outcome than in native vessels, mainly because of the risk of embolization. Direct stenting may diminish aggression to the vessel. This study reports the results of direct stenting in saphenous vein grafts. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We compared 2 cohorts of consecutive patients treated with direct stenting (DS) and stenting with predilatation (PD) in saphenous vein grafts between September 1998 and March 2003. In-hospital and long-term results and predictors of mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: The DS group contained 71 patients with 83 lesions, and the PD group contained 46 patients with 54 lesions. There were no differences in age, risk factors, age of the graft, ejection fraction, stent length, need for postdilatation or number of stents per lesion, although the DS group contained more women (DS=38%, PD=17%, P=.02), and stent diameter was larger (DS=3.59 [0.59] mm, PD=3.21 [0.59] mm, P=.001) in the DS group. Creatine phosphokinase elevation was > or =2-fold in 10% (DS=7%, PD=16%, P=.1). One patient died in the hospital. Median follow-up time was 36.1 months. Survival was 94+/- 2% at 12 months, 87+/-3% at 24 months, 82+/-17% at 36 months, 67+/-8% at 48 months and 58+/-7% at 60 months. Revascularization rate was 14% for the target lesion and 20.5% for the target vessel, with no differences between groups in mortality or revascularization success rate. Predictors of mortality were ejection fraction and smoking habit. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after stenting in saphenous vein grafts is similar with direct and conventional techniques, although there was a tendency toward a lower incidence of myocardial infarction with the former. Although the in-hospital results were favorable, long-term survival was less favorable with both techniques.

Aged↗

[Cardiac catheterization via the right radial artery with a Judkins left catheter. A prospective study].

Radial artery access improves the patient's well-being, permits earlier ambulation and diminishes vascular complications after cardiac catheterization. Using the same catheter to study the left and right coronary arteries may facilitate the technique. In a cohort of 100 patients we prospectively analyzed the possibility of studying both coronary arteries with a Judkins left 3.5 catheter. The variables studied were percentage of successful access, complications, and procedural time from insertion of the guiding catheter to the end of ventriculography. It was possible to catheterize both coronary arteries with the same catheter in 94 cases (94%) with a procedural time of 16.7 (6.8) min. In 6 patients a JR4 catheter was required, in one of them due to severe spasm of the right coronary artery ostium and due to impossibility to catheterize the ostium in the other 5. There were no cases of severe radial artery spasm.

Aged↗