Biomedical subjects

Emma Tham

Publications and source records attributed to Emma Tham.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Updated ENIGMA recommendations for reporting germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes and their translation into twenty languages.

Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility underpins precision cancer prevention and care. Gaps in the healthcare providers' genetic literacy and an ambiguous lexicon for variant description may hinder proper delivery and clinical application of consistently trustworthy test results. The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) international consortium supports controlled terminology and recommends a framework for reporting germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes, using breast cancer as an exemplar. Moving forward towards terminological coherence across disciplines and borders, the ENIGMA Clinical Working Group launched a multinational effort to release consortium-approved translations of the published recommendations. The herein reported Vocabulary Translation Project offered an opportunity to reappraise and align the reference text to the recent BRCA1 and BRCA2 specifications to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology rules by the ENIGMA Variant Curation Expert Panel and to highlight country-specific differences in breast cancer risk assessment and management. The updated recommendations and their 20 translations are now provided as easy to handle documents, covering 11 of the most widely spoken languages in the world. They will contribute to minimised erroneous inferences, more informed decision-making, improved health outcomes and equity in the use of genetic testing for cancer predisposition and in translational oncology.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Hereditary cancer: Germline testing practices across ERN GENTURIS member countries.

Germline genetic testing practices for hereditary cancer vary across the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) member countries. We surveyed experts in genetic testing from 20 EU member countries and Norway to assess multi-gene panel usage, availability of genome-wide sequencing, first-tier testing approaches, implementation of polygenic risk scores, and the roles of non-genetic healthcare professionals. National experts and members of the ERN GENTURIS completed a structured questionnaire covering founder germline pathogenic variants (gPV) testing, panel testing for common genetic tumour risk syndromes, use of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing, polygenic risk score implementation, use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples, laboratory accreditation, and the clinical roles of physicians, genetic counselors and nurses. Significant inter-country heterogeneity was observed. Most countries rely on next-generation sequencing (NGS) multi-gene panels. Founder gPV testing is first-line in a few high-prevalence populations (e.g., BRCA1/2 founders). All 21 countries offer NGS panel tests for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and ≥19 countries do so for colorectal and prostate cancers. However, NGS panel size and gene composition exhibit substantial variability. WES is available in 12 countries on a routine basis. Most countries implemented genetic testing on stored tumour tissue from deceased patients. In all countries, clinical geneticists can order germline genetic tests, and in 9 countries, any physician can do so. These findings show differences in accessibility to germline genetic testing of hereditary cancer in Europe. We propose EU-wide guidance via pathways, standards of care, and sharing of best practices to further optimize access to hereditary cancer genetic molecular diagnostics.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

A Swedish genome-wide haplotype association analysis identifies novel candidate loci associated with endometrial cancer risk.

Genome-wide association studies [GWAS] have identified a limited number of endometrial cancer risk loci by analyzing single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]. We hypothesized that analyzing haplotypes rather than SNPs could provide novel and more detailed information on genetic cancer susceptibility loci. To examine the association of a SNP or haplotype with endometrial cancer risk we performed a two-stage haplotype GWAS. The discovery GWAS included a sub-cohort of 1,116 Swedish endometrial cancer cases and 5,021 controls from previously published GWAS data. A sliding window analysis was employed with window sizes of 1-25 SNPs using a logistic regression model. The Swedish haplotype analysis identified 15 novel candidate risk loci (2q31.1, 4p16.1, 4p15.31, 6q13, 7p21.1, 9p13.3, 10q26.3, 11q21, 12q13.11, 13q12.11, 15q13.3, 16q24.3, 19q13.32, 20p12.3 and 22q13.2) with OR ranging from 1.6 to 3.3 and p-values from 4.25 × 10-8 to 9.86 × 10-15. A second replication haplotype analysis of the Swedish novel loci was performed using two cohorts from Belgium and Germany. In spite of small sample sizes in the replication cohorts, there was still support for most loci with positive ORs. In addition, the findings in the two European cohorts motivates further studies to search for founder haplotypes. These novel findings suggested that endometrial cancer loci, identified through haplotype analysis, conferred a higher risk compared to previous single-variant GWAS.

Humans↗