Biomedical subjects

Emmanuelle Le Page

Publications and source records attributed to Emmanuelle Le Page.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis: analytical evaluation for validation of a cytopathic effect assay.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines have recommended the use of validated assays for the measurement of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) to interferon beta (IFNbeta) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In an attempt of validation, we studied the analytical performance of a bioassay based on antiviral cytopathic effect (CPE) using WISH cells and the vesicular stomatitis virus (WISH/VSV CPE). METHODS: NAB titres measured with the WISH/VSV CPE assay in 63 sera from IFNbeta-treated MS patients were compared to those obtained with the reference CPE method using A549 cells and the encephalomyocarditis virus. Binding antibodies (BABs) were measured using a capture ELISA as a screening test for NABs. RESULTS: No false-negative BAB was obtained in our patients. The between-run coefficients of variation (CVs) determined with log10 titres of the NIH anti-IFNbeta (G038-501-572) yielded good results (<or=10.4%) and within-run variability was excellent (CV<or=2%). The log10 titres obtained with both CPE assays were highly correlated (r=0.969 and r=0.884 for anti-IFNbeta-1a and anti-IFNbeta-1b, respectively). The same patients were found NAB-positive with both CPE assays. CONCLUSION: Because of its good precision, sensitivity and excellent correlation with the reference CPE method, the WISH/VSV CPE bioassay can be used in the follow-up of IFNbeta-treated MS patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

[Drug therapy in multiple sclerosis].

For the last 10 years, three disease-modifying-therapy drugs have been approved by the French health authorities for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS: two of them are immunomodulatory agents (interferon beta 1a or 1b and glatiramer acetate), administered by subcutaneous or intramuscular injections at different time points, reducing by about 30% the risk of relapses. The third drug approved is an immunosuppressive agent, mitoxantrone, administered intravenously at a dose of 12 mg/m2 per month up to a maximum cumulative dose of 72 mg/m2, used as a second line therapy in rapidly worsening relapsing MS non responder to immunomodulatory agents. The impact of such medications in MS patients with gradual progression of disability has not yet been established either in secondary or primary progressive MS.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2005

The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monoclonal antibody therapy.

From 1991-2002, we treated 58 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using the humanised monoclonal antibody, Campath-1H, which causes prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. Clinical and surrogate markers of inflammation were suppressed. In both the relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) stages of the illness, Campath-1H reduced the annual relapse rate (from 2.2 to 0.19 and from 0.7 to 0.001 respectively; both p < 0.001). Remarkably, MRI scans of patients with SP disease, treated with Campath-1H 7 years previously, showed no new lesion formation. However, despite these effects on inflammation, disability was differently affected depending on the phase of the disease. Patients with SPMS showed sustained accumulation of disability due to uncontrolled progression marked by unrelenting cerebral atrophy, attributable to ongoing axonal loss. The rate of cerebral atrophy was greatest in patients with established cerebral atrophy and highest inflammatory lesion burden before treatment (2.3 versus 0.7 ml/year; p = 0.04). In contrast, patients with RR disease showed an impressive reduction in disability at 6 months after Campath-1H (by a mean of 1.2 EDSS points) perhaps owing to a suppression of on-going inflammation in these patients with unusually active disease. In addition, there was a further significant, albeit smaller, mean improvement in disability up to 36 months after treatment. We speculate that this represents the beneficial effects of early rescue of neurons and axons from a toxic inflammatory environment, and that prevention of demyelination will prevent long-term axonal degeneration. These concepts are currently being tested in a controlled trial comparing Campath-1H and IFN-beta in the treatment of drug-naïve patients with early, active RR MS.

Alemtuzumab↗

PubMed2004

Rationale for the use of mitoxantrone in multiple sclerosis.

Mitoxantrone is a member of the anthracendione family developed to treat malignancies and increasingly used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). It has been studied as a treatment for MS since the late 1980s, and is licensed in a number of countries for progressive and worsening MS. Review of the published earlier open-label, and more recently of controlled trials suggests that mitoxantrone is efficacious in cases of worsening MS that have an inflammatory component as evidenced by progression with or without superimposed relapses and/or gadolinium (Gd) enhancing magnetic resonance (MR) lesions. Today there is no robust evidence of efficacy in primary progressive MS or in later stages of secondary progressive MS beyond an EDSS score of 6. Relevant immunomodulatory mechanisms act both on T- and B-cell function, and mitoxantrone has selective immune effects in MS by decreasing levels of TNF-alpha, IL-2, IL-2R-beta1, IL-10 and IFN-gamma. Adverse events include nausea, alopecia, infections, menstrual disorders, risk of cardiotoxicity and malignancy. Different regimens are used according to different regulatory demands in different countries. The two most commonly used regimens are every 3 months intravenous (i.v.) 12 mg/m2 for 2 years or 20 mg mitoxantrone (i.v.) combined with 1 g methylprednisolone (i.v.) every 4 weeks for 6 months. The cumulative life dose in MS patients is 140 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone is currently used as a second line drug in MS patients whose disease is not controlled by beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate. In this review, we will discuss the clinical disease patterns of MS patients who are most likely to benefit from mitoxantrone, its magnitude of clinical effect, and limitations of using mitoxantrone in MS. Mitoxantrone as a second line therapy in non-responders of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate will be assessed. Recent strategies of combination therapy, and the optimal dose regimen will also be discussed.

Cytokines↗