Emmanuelle Simon | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the impact of CEDIT (French Committee for the Assessment and Dissemination of Technological Innovations) recommendations on the introduction of technological innovations within the AP-HP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), the French hospital network to which this body is attached. METHODS: In 2002, a study based on semidirective interviews of fourteen people affected by these recommendations and a case study relating to thirteen recommendations issued between 1995 and 1998 were conducted. RESULTS: The CEDIT is very scientifically reputable among interviewees. There is generally widespread interest for the recommendations. They are used as decision-making tools by administrative staff and as negotiating instruments by doctors in their dealings with management. Based on the case study, ten of thirteen recommendations had an impact on the introduction of the technology in health establishments. One recommendation appears not to have had an impact. Furthermore, the impact of two technologies was impossible to assess. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant impact of recommendations arising from a structure that is attached to a hospital network and the good match between CEDIT's objectives and its assignments.

Decision Making↗

PubMed2004

An improved electronic microarray-based diagnostic assay for identification of MEFV mutations.

Recent technological advances, such as DNA chip devices that allow automated, high-throughput genotyping, promise to considerably improve the detection capability of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in clinically relevant genes. We used the NanoChip(R) Molecular Biology Workstation (Nanogen, www.nanogen.com) and recently introduced microelectronic array technology to develop a detection method for the more frequent mutations involved in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), an autosomal recessive disease that affects several ethnic groups in the Mediterranean population, whose early diagnosis is crucial if severe complications are to be prevented. We adapted the previously described Nanogen procedures to FMF mutation analysis, introducing modifications that notably improve the technique. First, as the original procedure makes use of costly dye-tagged reporter sequences, we devised a universal reporter strategy, which was first evaluated and validated on the robust, previously established factor V Leiden and factor II (prothrombin) NanoChip diagnostic assays. FMF (MEFV), factor V (F5), and factor II (F2) genotypes identified using this improved system were totally concordant with results of other genotyping methods (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DGGE], SSCP, and RFLP analysis). Second, we showed that the target sequences loaded on the NanoChip cartridges can be rehybridized several times in a highly reproducible manner, allowing sequential analysis of mutations. Thus, we devised a strategy that allows us to monitor the possible interference of additional mutations or SNPs at probe or stabilizer sequences. Finally, a comparative cost per sample analysis demonstrates that the accurate and reproducible FMF mutation detection assay we developed can be readily implemented in the clinical laboratory setting at reasonable expense.

Base Sequence↗