PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ena Ladi

Publications and source records attributed to Ena Ladi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Thymocyte motility: mutants, movies and migration patterns.

Developing T cells are highly motile and undergo long-range migrations in the thymus as part of their developmental program. In the past two years, significant advances have been made in understanding the nature of the signals that control the entry of thymocyte progenitors into the thymus and the exit of mature thymocytes from the thymus. Progress has also been made in identifying the chemokine signals that control intrathymic migration patterns. In addition, the recent application of two-photon laser scanning microscopy has made it possible to make real-time observations of thymocytes within the three-dimensional environment of the thymus, and has shed new light on the relationship between positive selection and thymocyte migration.

Animals↗

Thymic microenvironments for T cell differentiation and selection.

The adult thymus provides a variety of specialized microenvironments that support and direct T cell differentiation and selection. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the understanding of the function of microenvironments in shaping a diverse T cell repertoire. In particular, we focus on how thymocytes move in and out of these specialized thymic compartments in response to homing signals, differential chemokine gradients and other factors that regulate T cell migration. In addition, we discuss the diverse developmental signals provided by these microenvironments that contribute to the generation of divergent T cell lineages.

Animals↗

The divergent DSL ligand Dll3 does not activate Notch signaling but cell autonomously attenuates signaling induced by other DSL ligands.

Mutations in the DSL (Delta, Serrate, Lag2) Notch (N) ligand Delta-like (Dll) 3 cause skeletal abnormalities in spondylocostal dysostosis, which is consistent with a critical role for N signaling during somitogenesis. Understanding how Dll3 functions is complicated by reports that DSL ligands both activate and inhibit N signaling. In contrast to other DSL ligands, we show that Dll3 does not activate N signaling in multiple assays. Consistent with these findings, Dll3 does not bind to cells expressing any of the four N receptors, and N1 does not bind Dll3-expressing cells. However, in a cell-autonomous manner, Dll3 suppressed N signaling, as was found for other DSL ligands. Therefore, Dll3 functions not as an activator as previously reported but rather as a dedicated inhibitor of N signaling. As an N antagonist, Dll3 promoted Xenopus laevis neurogenesis and inhibited glial differentiation of mouse neural progenitors. Finally, together with the modulator lunatic fringe, Dll3 altered N signaling levels that were induced by other DSL ligands.

Animals↗

A secreted Delta1-Fc fusion protein functions both as an activator and inhibitor of Notch1 signaling.

Signaling induced through interactions between DSL (Delta, serrate, LAG-2) ligand-signaling cells and Notch-responding cells influences the developmental fate of a wide variety of invertebrate and vertebrate cell types. Consistently with a requirement for direct cell-cell interactions, secreted DSL ligands expressed in flies do not appear to activate Notch signaling but rather produce phenotypes reminiscent of losses in Notch signaling. In contrast, secreted DSL ligands expressed in Caenorhabditis elegans or supplied to mammalian cells in culture produce effects indicative of Notch activation. In fact, engineered secreted DSL ligands have been used to study Notch signaling in neurogenesis, gliogenesis, hematopoeisis, neurite morphogenesis and ligand-induced nuclear translocation of the Notch intracellular domain. Using a recombinant, secreted form of the DSL ligand Delta1, we found that antibody-induced oligomerization (termed "clustering") was required for this soluble ligand to bind specifically to Notch1-expressing cells, undergo internalization, and activate downstream signaling. Interestingly, clustering with either limiting or excess antibody led to ligand binding in the absence of Notch signaling, indicating that ligand binding is necessary but not sufficient for activation of Notch signaling. Moreover, such antibody clustering conditions blocked Notch1 signaling induced by membrane-bound DSL ligands. We propose that multimerization influences whether ligand binding to Notch results in activation or inhibition of downstream signaling and suggest that differences in ligand presentation might account for why secreted forms of DSL ligands have been reported to function as agonists and antagonists of Notch signal transduction.

Animals↗