PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Enrico Zanalda

Publications and source records attributed to Enrico Zanalda.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Predictors of psychiatric disorders in liver transplantation candidates: logistic regression models.

This study has two goals. The first goal is to assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) candidates by means of standardized procedures because there has been little research concerning psychiatric problems of potential OLT candidates using standardized instruments. The second goal focuses on identifying predictors of these psychiatric disorders. One hundred sixty-five elective OLT candidates were assessed by our unit. Psychiatric diagnoses were based on the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Patients also were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Spielberger Anxiety Index, State and Trait forms (STAI-X1 and STAI-X2). Severity of cirrhosis was assessed by applying Child-Pugh score criteria. Chi-squared and general linear model analysis of variance were used to test the univariate association between patient characteristics and both clinical psychiatric diagnoses and severity of psychiatric diseases. Variables with P less than.10 in univariate analyses were included in multiple regression models. Forty-three percent of patients presented at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Child-Pugh score and previous psychiatric diagnoses were independent significant predictors of depressive disorders. Severity of psychiatric symptoms measured by psychometric scales (HDRS, STAI-X1, and STAI-X2) was associated with Child-Pugh score in the multiple regression model. Our data suggest a high rate of psychiatric disorders, particularly adjustment disorders, in our sample of OLT candidates. Severity of liver disease emerges as the most important variable in predicting severity of psychiatric disorders in these patients.

Adult↗

A comparison of paroxetine and amisulpride in the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary data on the effects of paroxetine and amisulpride on depressive dimensions, analyzed by factor analysis, in dysthymic patients. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients with DSM IV criteria for DD without concurrent major depression were enrolled in this 8-week, open study, and 100 completed it. Symptom dimensions were identified by principal components analysis with the SAS Factor procedure. RESULTS: Results of the symptom rating scales indicated that both drugs were equally effective. Response rate was 65% both in the paroxetine and the amisulpride group and the proportions of patients achieving a final HRSD score < or =7 were 46.7 and 55%, respectively. MADRS factor analysis identified two factors at baseline: the first corresponding to the global severity of depression and the second to somatic symptoms. After 8 weeks of treatment only one factor could be substantiated. At week 4 both paroxetine and amisulpride produced significant improvements on factor 1 while at week 8 mean changes of factor 1 were greater in the amisulpride-treated patients. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation was the open-label design. CONCLUSIONS: Both paroxetine and amisulpride appear to be effective in the short-term management of DD, improving its most characteristic symptoms.

Administration, Oral↗

Decrease of the D4 dopamine receptor messenger RNA expression in lymphocytes from patients with major depression.

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of the possible role of dopamine in psychiatric disorders has been limited by the relative inadequacy of tools. A tempting approach to examine alterations of dopaminergic system in major depression is to examine the expression of dopamine receptors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). METHODS: D4 dopamine receptor (D4DR) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in PBMC from 12 patients with major depressive disorder was examined before and after an 8-week treatment with paroxetine at 20-50 mg/day. Ten healthy subjects were analyzed in parallel. The relative content of D4DR mRNA was determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). using beta-actin as internal standard. RESULTS: D4DR mRNA levels were significantly decreased in untreated depressed patients as compared to controls. D4DR mRNA expression returned to control levels after paroxetine treatment, when patients achieved a significant improvement of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study suggest the role of PBMC D4DR mRNA expression as a peripheral marker of the central dopaminergic function in major depression.

Actins↗