Biomedical subjects

Enrique Cao Avellaneda

Publications and source records attributed to Enrique Cao Avellaneda.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

[Fatal evolution of a renal angiosarcoma].

OBJECTIVES: Report a new case of renal angiosarcoma treated by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with bad results. METHODS: 72-year-old male undergoing right nephrectomy for renal tumor. Pathology reports renal angiosarcoma. RESULTS: Three months after surgery patient refers lumbar pain and hemoptysis and CT scan reveals the existence of multiple bone and lung metastasis; a regimen of systemic chemotherapy with Doxorrubicine+ Ifosfamide was started without response; he died two months later. CONCLUSIONS: Primary renal angiosarcoma is very rare, with less than 10 cases in the literature before 1998, and it is always associated with bad prognosis. Diagnosis is based on immunohistochemical studies (antibodies against CD31, CD34 and factor VIII related antigen) to define the endothelial differentiation of the tumor. There is no experience to define the best therapeutic strategy against this entity.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

[Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs. open nephrectomy in the treatment of clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. Comparative study].

INTRODUCTION: The description of the first laparoscopic nephrectomy made a revolution in the managing of the benign and malignant renal diseases. Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) was developed with the aim of offering advantages to both patients and surgeons. The aim of the present work is to compare, in our experience, the results offered in the radical nephrectomy by HAL and open surgery, by analysis of surgical time, estimated blood loss during surgery and hospital stay. METHODS: Eleven Hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) radical nephrectomies and eight open radical nephrectomies were carried out at our institution during the same period (June 2001 to December 2002). All patients underwent computed tomography and were found to have a clinically localised functioning renal mass in all cases. The size of this renal mass was 4-7 cm (average 5.5 cm) in the HAL group and 4.5-15 cm (average 7.8 cm) in the open group. Patient age, body mass index, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists' score showed no significant difference between groups. RESULTS: The average surgical time in the HAL group was 156.72 minutes, the average blood loss during surgery was of 83.6 ml and the average hospital stay was of 3.09 days. Conversion to open surgery was not necessary in any patient. Average surgical time in the open surgery group was 178.25 minutes, the estimated blood loss during surgery was of 337.75 ml (p < 0.05) and the hospital stay was of 5.37 days (p < 0.05). The comparison of the means by two-tailed student's t test revealed significant differences in estimated blood loss and hospital stay, favoring HAL, and no significant differences in surgical time. CONCLUSIONS: HAL nephrectomy is feasible in almost all nephrectomies and is a safe, reproducible, and minimally invasive technique to perform extirpable renal surgery. HAL offer clear advantages over traditional open surgery, including decreased blood loss and hospital stay.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2003

[Magnetic resonance urogram as alternative to i.v. urography. Report of 3 cases. Review of the literature].

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous urography (IVU) has been classically considered as an essential examination in the great majority of urologic diseases due to the great amount of information that supplies both functional and morphological, mainly for ureteral abnormalities where other exams do not reach enough definition. Nevertheless, there are cases in which it is not possible to perform an intravenous urography due to allergy to iodine contrasts or renal failure with impossibility of contrast excretion. METHODS: We report three cases which represent the example of the indications of MRI urography as an alternative to IVU in cases in which this latter cannot or should not be performed. RESULTS: MRI urography is completely accepted as a diagnostic technique for urologic diseases as an alternative to IVU. It has advantages, such as obtaining images in multiple planes, avoiding the use of ionizing radiation, that there is no evidence of it causing cell damage, that it does not require glomerular elimination of any substance so it can be used in patients with renal failure and allergy to iodine contrasts. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI urography results in an advantage for patients with renal failure, iodine contrasts allergy, or greater risk of contrast nephrotoxicity as it is the case of renal transplant patients.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Controversies in the evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria].

OBJECTIVE: Asymptomatic microhematuria continues to be a problem. It has a prevalence of 16% and numerous conditions can present this clinical manifestation. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out on all patients that consulted at the urological services during 2000 for asymptomatic hematuria. Patients presenting with irritative symptoms, urethral secretion, perineal or suprapubic pain, urinary tract infections, renal lithiasis or history of trauma were not included in the study. RESULTS: None of the patients presented tumors. Two patients presented renal lithiasis, 5 simple renal cysts, 8 hypercalciuria and 3 hyperuricosuria. None of the 11 patients with hypercalciuria or hyperuricosuria had a history of lithiasis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the size of the study is small, the incidence of tumors in patients with asymptomatic microhematuria appears to be far from the 12.5% incidence reported by some authors and might probably be closer to the 0.5% incidence reported by others. Furthermore, the significant pathology (renal lithiasis), which requires treatment, is also infrequent.

Calcium↗