Biomedical subjects

Eric Barret

Publications and source records attributed to Eric Barret.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

The aim of this study is to report the relative advantages and disadvantages of the radical prostatectomy with a laparoscopic (LRP) and a robotic (RALP) approach. A medline search was performed. Published data regarding perioperative parameters, complications, oncological results, functional results were analyzed. Shorter learning curves have been reported with the RALP. Intra-operative and post-operative outcomes appear to be comparable between the two approaches. The average time for LRP is 234 min (151-453) versus 182 min (141-250) for RALP. Estimated blood loss for the LRP averages 482 ml (185-850) versus 234 ml (75-500) for the RALP. Complication rates in single institution studies are similar. Long-term outcomes data on PSA progression is not yet available for LRP or RALP due to their relatively short existence. RALP appears to offer a significant benefit to the laparoscopically naïve surgeon with respect to learning curve when compared to LRP. This, however, comes at an increased cost. Intra-operative and post-operative outcomes appear to be similar. Longer follow-up data is necessary to compare oncological and functional outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Benefits of laparoscopic prostate-sparing radical cystectomy.

PURPOSE: Prostate-sparing radical cystectomy has been described in the literature and has proven to be a promising procedure owing to the continence and erectile function results without necessarily compromising the oncologic outcome in selected patients. TECHNIQUE POINTS: A transperitoneal approach is used. Lymph node dissection is performed with frozen section, and then the ureters are ligated and biopsied. The seminal vesicles are dissected, followed by complete mobilization of the bladder. Incision of the bladder neck is performed, followed by simple prostatectomy. Finally, bowel reconstruction is carried out via a small infra-umbilical incision that also permits the extraction of the surgical specimen and the anastomosis of neobladder to the prostate capsule. A total of 25 patients have undergone this procedure, with average surgical times of 285 min and blood loss of 640 ml. The complications encountered included: one bowel incarceration, one urinary leak, one lymphocele and one port hernia. At median 9 months follow-up, no patient presented with daytime incontinence, although seven complained of nocturia. A total of 20 patients maintained their preoperative sexual potency, and four reported a postoperative decrease in their erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic prostate-sparing radical cystectomy appears to be oncologically safe, reproducible and has promising functional benefits. The authors believe this procedure presents a good option in very select patients.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

PubMed2006

[Place of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma].

The current reference treatment for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma is open nephroureterectomy via a lumbar incision and an iliac incision with resection of a large bladder cuff: Since the first laparoscopic nephroureterectomy performed in 1991, several teams have studied this approach for the treatment of urinary tract tumours. Laparoscopy has the advantage of decreased morbidity for the patient and allows early return to work. Recent published series do not demonstrate any difference in terms of cancer control between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. However, the follow-up of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is still limited and the safety of this technique has not been fully demonstrated. It therefore appears preferable to limit the indications for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy to small and/or low-grade tumours to avoid excessive manipulation of large transitional cell carcinomas in a gaseous atmosphere that can predispose to dissemination during dissection. Diagnostic ureteroscopy has therefore become a useful tool in the preoperative assessment. Biopsies can determine the tumour grade and guide the surgeon's choice of surgical approach.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗

PubMed2005

[Laparoscopic treatment of urological malignancies].

This literature review highlights the laparoscopic prostatectomy, partial and total nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, and total cystectomy. The indications, operative technique, complications and outcomes of each are discussed.

Cystectomy↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases.

PURPOSE: Radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, and the laparoscopic approach is currently being evaluated worldwide. We report our preliminary results of this laparoscopic surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2001 and February 2005, we have performed a total of 84 laparoscopic assisted prostatocystectomies or cystectomies for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder on 71 male and 13 female patients. The 2002 TNM staging for these tumors were: pTa-1: 13 cases; pT2: 59 cases; pT3: 11 cases; pT4: 1 case. Technical aspects are described and the initial results are reported. RESULTS: The median operating time was 280 min. The median blood loss was 550 cc with a transfusion rate of 5%. There has been no conversion to an open technique. COMPLICATIONS: No death, one pulmonary embolism, two urinary fistulas, three haematomas, one pyelonephritis. ONCOLOGICAL RESULTS: The pathology reports confirmed that all the surgical margins were free of tumor invasion. After 18 months of follow up no trocar seeding was observed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic assisted cystectomy is a feasible technique which results in decreased bleeding and less postoperative pain. Long term follow-up is needed to confirm the oncologic outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with the extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We describe the technique, clinical and oncological results, and functional outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2002, to March 2004, 600 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed by an extraperitoneal approach and evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 599 extraperitoneal procedures were performed successfully. Mean operative time was 173 minutes. Mean operative blood loss was 380 cc. The transfusion rate was 1.2%. The major and minor complications rate was 2.3% and 9.2%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Mean hospital stay was 6.3 days. Pathological stage was pT2 and pT3 in 72% and 28% of cases, respectively. Mean Gleason score was 7. The overall positive margin rate was 17.7% (14.6% and 25.6% of pT2 and pT3 tumors, respectively). Median followup was 12 months. Of the patients 95% had prostate specific antigen less than 0.2 ng/ml. Patients were evaluated by a self-questionnaire sent by mail before and after surgery (International Continence Society and International Index of Erectile Function-5). At a median followup of 12 months 84% of the patients were continent (no pad), 7% used 1 precautionary pad and 7% needed 1 pad routinely. At a median followup of 6 months in preoperatively potent patients (International Index of Erectile Function-5 greater than 20) the postoperative erection and intercourse rate was 64% and 43%, respectively, in those with bilateral nerve bundle preservation. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal technique is a reliable approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

[Robotic surgery: toy or tool?].

Telemanipulation has been developed for industrial purposes since the 1970s. More recently, telemanipulated arms entered the operating room. This paper briefly describes the history of surgical robotics and discusses the advantages and disadvantages for both patients and surgeons. The authors advocate the development of robotic surgery, as it facilitates the training of young surgeons and can be useful during certain phases of an operation. Thus, robotic surgery is more a promising tool than a simple toy.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To describe our preliminary experience with the extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February and December 2002, we performed 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies by an extraperitoneal approach. RESULTS: Of the procedures, 98 were completed as planned, while conversion to a transperitoneal approach was necessary in 2 patients with previous mesh hernia repair. The mean operative time was 163 minutes. The mean operative blood loss was 375 mL. The transfusion rate was 3%. No rectal, bowel, ureteral, or nervous injury was observed. There were no major complications. There were nine minor complications (four anastomotic leakages, one rectus muscle hematoma, four cases of acute urinary retention). The mean hospital stay was 6.1 days. Mean catheterization lasted 6 days. The pathologic stage was T2a, T2b, T2c, T3a, and T3b in 17%, 22%, 39%, 12%, and 10%, respectively. The mean Gleason score was 7. The margins were positive in 15% of the pT2 and in 35% of the pT3 tumors; 48% of the positive margins occurred in the first 25 cases. The median follow-up was 12 months; 93% of the patients had a serum prostate specific antigen concentration <0.2 ng/mL. No patient has presented with clinical port-site metastasis. All the patients were evaluated by questionnaire sent by mail before and after the surgery. With a median follow-up of 12 months, 86% of the patients were continent (no pads), 7% of the patients used 1 precaution pad, and 7% had need for 1 pad routinely. With a median follow-up of 6 months, among the preoperatively potent patients (IIEF5 >20), the postoperative erection and intercourse rate was 64% and 43% in patients with bilateral and unilateral nerve-bundle preservation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The extraperitoneal technique is a reliable approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The choice between a transperitoneal or an extraperitoneal approach depends on the surgeon's experience.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

PubMed2003

[Use in daily urological practice of an ultrasound device for measuring bladder volume].

INTRODUCTION: Bladder volume estimation is an everyday necessity in urology, especially for evaluation of the postvoid residual volume (PVR). The Bladder-Scan is a portable, noninvasive ultrasound device for bladder volume estimation. This study was designed to assess the value of the Bladder-Scan to measure PVR in routine hospital urological practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 1/12/1999 to 30/4/2000 with systematic use of the Bladder-Scan to measure PVR. Four operators performed three consecutive measurements of PVR and noted the following data: age, gender, history, type of disease and place of examination. The main endpoint was the need to use a complementary investigation to confirm or invalidate the result obtained. RESULTS: PVR was determined in 250 consecutive patients (167 males, 83 females): 191 patients admitted to the urology department, 36 patients seen in the emergency room and 23 patients seen in other departments of the hospital. PVR was estimated to be between 0 and 400 cc (median: 72 cc) for 181 patients (72%), between 400 cc and 750 cc (median: 521 cc) in 50 patients (20%) and between 750 cc and 1000 cc (median: 942 cc) for 19 patients (8%). A control of the measurement was required for 27% of patients (68/250) using catheterism (n = 53) or sonography (n = 15). In this sub-group, the value of the ICC (intra-class correlation coefficient) for the measurement of the bladder volume using the Bladder-Scan and measurement of the volume controlled by sonography or catheterism was of 0.9888 (significance < 0.0001/nil hypothesis ICC = 0). CONCLUSION: The Bladder-Scan provides a "third hand" in the urologist's daily practice, by supplying a reliable and rapid assessment of bladder volume for volumes < 750 cc. It is a good tool for the evaluation of postvoid residual volume.

Diagnostic Techniques, Urological↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic partial kidney ablation with high intensity focused ultrasound.

PURPOSE: High intensity focused ultrasound has been performed for transrectal and extracorporeal thermal ablation of tissues. We developed and tested a laparoscopic probe that allows real-time ultrasound imaging during partial renal ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound. METHODS: A Sonablate 200 (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, Indiana) high intensity focused ultrasound system with a modified 18 mm. laparoscopic probe was used in all experiments. In 13 Yucatan mini-pigs a 5Fr ureteral catheter was inserted into the renal pelvis and 10 cc air were instilled into the collecting system. The kidney was laparoscopically dissected, the high intensity focused ultrasound probe was inserted through a 33 mm. laparoscopic port and the targeted renal pole was treated. RESULTS: Renal lesions were created in 12 of 13 treated kidneys under real-time ultrasound visualization. Median operative time was 180 minutes, average high intensity focused ultrasound activation time was 18.3 minutes and lesion size was 23 x 17 x 11 mm. At 4 and 14 days 4 (acute group) and 6 (subacute group) animals were available for renal functional and anatomical evaluation, respectively. No difference in renal function was seen in treated and untreated kidneys. Pathological examination at 14 days revealed homogenous and complete tissue necrosis throughout the whole volume of the lesion with sharp demarcation from adjacent normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to refine a probe for laparoscopic high intensity focused ultrasound delivery capable of simultaneous ultrasound imaging. Partial renal ablation using this probe is feasible and safe, and resulted in homogenous, complete and reproducible lesions.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery using blunt 12-mm trocar without fascial closure.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conical blunt trocar insertion may eliminate the need for fascial closure (FC) in transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery. This concept applies to 12-mm blunt trocar placement through muscular parts of the abdominal wall, relying on muscle splitting and eventual muscle retraction when the trocar is removed. We retrospectively assessed the safety of fascial nonclosure (FNC) after 12-mm blunt port insertion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety transperitoneal laparoscopic renal procedures were performed between August 1999 and May 2000. Four ports (two 12 mm and two 5 mm) were usually used except for 30 donor nephrectomies, where an additional 5-mm port was used. The 12-mm trocars were inserted at the lateral border of the rectus muscle 5 cm below the costal margin and in the anterior axillary line 8 cm below the costal margin. Fascial closure was performed in 62 patients and nonclosure in 28 patients. Exclusion criteria for FNC included midline location, malnutrition, renal failure, and chronic use of steroids. Postoperative outcomes were compared in 20 patients with FNC matched with 20 patients with FC. RESULTS: At an average of 4.8 months of follow-up, none of the patients developed a trocar site hernia. No significant statistical differences were observed between the groups with regard to intraoperative and postoperative data. CONCLUSIONS: These two approaches appear to be equivalent in terms of patient morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. Fascial nonclosure after transperitoneal 12-mm blunt trocar insertion, through muscular parts of the abdominal wall may be safe and efficacious and eliminates the last step in transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience.

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the morbidity, and minor and major complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgical team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 28, 1998 and February 28, 2001, 567 patients 42 to 77 years old (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 63.5 +/- 6) with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, including 458 (80.6%), without lymphadenectomy. Mean body mass index was 25.3 +/- 2.9 (range 17.3 to 37.5). American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 1 to 3 in 65%, 27% and 8% of cases, respectively. A total of 12 patients (2.1%) had undergone intra-abdominal surgery below the mesocolon and 40 had undergone urological surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded as well as all complications and their severity score within the initial 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 105 complications were observed in 97 patients (17.1%), including 21 major (3.7%) and 83 minor (14.6%) complications. Of the patients 21 (3.7%) underwent reoperation for a postoperative complication, including 10 (1.76%) who required an intensive care unit stay. Seven cases (1.2%) were converted to conventional retropubic radical prostatectomy. Mean blood loss was 380 +/- 195 ml. and the overall transfusion rate was 4.9%. In 2 patients (0.3%) deep vein thrombosis was associated with another surgical complication but not with pulmonary embolism. Urological, bowel and hemorrhagic complications represented 66.6%, 16.2% and 7.6% (total 89.4%) of all complications, and 20%, 33.3% and 33.3% of all repeat interventions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed according to the defined protocol with no complications in 82.9% of patients. The morbidity of this approach compares favorably with that of retropubic surgery. Growing experience and knowledge sharing concerning the prevention and early management of these complications would make possible a further decrease in the morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Adult↗