Biomedical subjects

Eric Bonnefoy

Publications and source records attributed to Eric Bonnefoy.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Postconditioning the human heart.

BACKGROUND: In animal models, brief periods of ischemia performed just at the time of reperfusion can reduce infarct size, a phenomenon called postconditioning. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study, we investigated whether postconditioning may protect the human heart during coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients, submitted to coronary angioplasty for ongoing acute myocardial infarction, contributed to the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control or a postconditioning group. After reperfusion by direct stenting, control subjects underwent no further intervention, whereas postconditioning was performed within 1 minute of reflow by 4 episodes of 1-minute inflation and 1-minute deflation of the angioplasty balloon. Infarct size was assessed by measuring total creatine kinase release over 72 hours. Area at risk and collateral blood flow were estimated on left ventricular and coronary angiograms. No adverse events occurred in the postconditioning group. Determinants of infarct size, including ischemia time, size of the area at risk, and collateral flow, were comparable between the 2 groups. Area under the curve of creatine kinase release was significantly reduced in the postconditioning compared with the control group, averaging 208 984+/-26 576 compared with 326,095+/-48,779 (arbitrary units) in control subjects, ie, a 36% reduction in infarct size. Blush grade, a marker of myocardial reperfusion, was significantly increased in postconditioned compared with control subjects: 2.44+/-0.17 versus 1.95+/-0.27, respectively (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that postconditioning by coronary angioplasty protects the human heart during acute myocardial infarction.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Is primary angioplasty more effective than prehospital fibrinolysis in diabetics with acute myocardial infarction? Data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: The CAPTIM study randomized patients managed within 6 h of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to primary angioplasty or prehospital fibrinolysis (rt-PA), with immediate transfer to a centre with interventional facilities. It found a similar incidence of the primary endpoint of death, recurrent MI, or stroke at 30 days with both strategies. We report here the outcome in the diabetic subgroup. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relationship of diabetic status (diabetics, n=103, non-diabetics, n=731) and treatment strategy with the occurrence of the primary endpoint and of death was analysed. Compared with non-diabetics, diabetics had a higher baseline risk profile, a higher rate of the primary endpoint (14.6 vs. 5.6%; P=0.002), and a high rate of mortality (8.7 vs. 3.1%; P=0.01) at 30 days. The incidence of the primary endpoint tended to be higher in diabetics randomized to prehospital fibrinolysis compared with those randomized to primary angioplasty [21.7 vs. 8.8% (10/46 vs. 5/57); RR: 2.47 (0.91-6.74); P=0.09]. This difference was driven by the higher mortality in the fibrinolysis group [13.0 vs. 5.3% (6/46 vs. 3/57); RR: 2.47 (0.7-9.4); P=0.29]. For non-diabetics, no such trend was observed. Compared with non-diabetics, diabetics had a much higher rate of rescue angioplasty (41.4 vs. 23.5%; P=0.01) and a higher mortality after rescue angioplasty [17.4 vs. 0% (4/23 vs. 0/90); P=0.001]. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that diabetic patients presenting within 6 h of an acute myocardial infarction may derive particular benefit from a strategy of primary angioplasty. However, the small number of diabetic patients in this subgroup analysis does not allow a final conclusion and a specifically designed study is warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study.

OBJECTIVES: This ancillary study of the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) trial sought to assess the cost-efficacy ratio of primary coronary angioplasty (PCA) and pre-hospital thrombolysis (PHT) in patients suffering from an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (<6 h) close to (<60 min journey) a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center. BACKGROUND: In the CAPTIM study, at 30 days follow-up PCA was as equally effective as PHT with rescue angioplasty if needed. The cost efficacy of these two strategies has not yet been compared. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for 299 patients in three centers. The efficacy analysis was extended at one-year follow-up for those patients. Direct fixed and variable actual costs were assessed with a piggyback data collection. RESULTS: The one-year primary end point event-rate (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) was not different after PCA or PHT (14% vs. 16. 4%, p = NS). Costs were lower in the PCA group either during the in-hospital period (8,287 vs. 9,170 $, p = 0.0001) and after one-year follow-up, in relation to a higher rate of subsequent revascularizations in the PHT group (49% vs. 23%, p < 0. 01), leading to a longer hospital stay (10 vs. 9.1 days, p = 0. 03). CONCLUSIONS: After AMI in patients less than 1 h from a PCI center, PCA is as effective and less costly than a combined strategy of PHT followed by rescue angioplasty.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2005

Significance of serum troponin I elevation in patients with acute aortic dissection of the ascending aorta.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the prevalence of increased cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in patients with acute aortic dissection of the ascending aorta (type A). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 119 consecutive patients with type A acute aortic dissection, serum cardiac troponin I was measured along with clinical, haemodynamic, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables obtained on admission. Cardiac troponin I was positive in 28 patients (23.5%; mean +/- SD: 6.1 +/- 14.7 ng/ml) and above the myocardial infarction threshold (1.5 ng/ml) in 12 (10%). Catecholamine infusion (17.9% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.03) and higher value of creatinine (35.7% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.03) were more frequent in patients with elevated troponin. Total mortality was 29.7% (n = 35) and surgical mortality was 16.8% (n = 17). An increased troponin was discriminatory with respect to mortality (OR: 4.1 (1.6-9.9); p = 0.002) in univariate analysis. However, this association was lost when other markers of death (age, stroke, ST-segment elevation, tamponade, catecholamine infusion, renal failure) were added in a multivariate model (OR: 2.2 (0.7-7.4); p = 0.19) indicating that the myocardial loss associated with troponin increase is not in itself a factor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac troponin I elevation is frequent in patients with type A aortic dissection. It might reflect a higher haemodynamic stress but does not necessarily reflect a negative prognosis.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Abdominal CT angiography before surgery as a predictor of postoperative death in acute aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to search for a relationship between postoperative death in acute aortic dissection and abdominal helical CT findings before surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 48 patients admitted to our institution for emergent surgery of acute aortic dissection diagnosed with helical CT angiography. We recorded postoperative deaths and analyzed abdominal helical CT vessels and parenchymal abnormalities, including the presence of dissected abdominal aortic branches, a compressed aortic lumen, and low enhancement of the parenchyma in abdominal organs. RESULTS: Among the 48 patients, 11 died after surgery. Postoperative death occurred in one of five patients with low enhancement of the parenchyma in one abdominal organ and in seven of eight patients with low enhancement of the parenchyma in at least two abdominal organs. The postoperative death rates strongly correlated with the number of low-enhanced abdominal organs per patient (p < 0.00005) but did not correlate with the number of dissected abdominal aortic branches. CONCLUSION: The rate of abdominal organs with low enhancement of the parenchyma seen on CT before surgery is a strong factor in outcome in patients with acute aortic dissection. Additional analysis of low enhancement of the parenchyma in abdominal organs on CT might be a useful tool to detect, before surgery, patients at risk of postoperative death.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: CAPTIM was a randomized trial comparing prehospital thrombolysis with transfer to an interventional facility (and, if needed, percutaneous intervention) with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Because the benefit of thrombolysis is maximal during the first 2 hours after symptom onset, and because prehospital thrombolysis can be implemented earlier than PCI, this analysis studied the relationship between the effect of assigned treatment and the time elapsed from symptom onset. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomization within 2 hours (n=460) or > or =2 hours (n=374) after symptom onset had no impact on the effect of treatment on the 30-day combined primary end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and disabling stroke. However, patients randomized <2 hours after symptom onset had a strong trend toward lower 30-day mortality with prehospital thrombolysis compared with those randomized to primary PCI (2.2% versus 5.7%, P=0.058), whereas mortality was similar in patients randomized > or =2 hours (5.9% versus 3.7%, P=0.47). There was a significant interaction between treatment effect and delay with respect to 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 4.19, 95% CI 1.033 to 17.004, P=0.045). Among patients randomized in the first 2 hours, cardiogenic shock was less frequent with lytic therapy than with primary PCI (1.3% versus 5.3%, P=0.032), whereas rates were similar in patients randomized later. CONCLUSIONS: Time from symptom onset should be considered when one selects reperfusion therapy in STEMI. Prehospital thrombolysis may be preferable to primary PCI for patients treated within the first 2 hours after symptom onset.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study.

BACKGROUND: Although both prehospital fibrinolysis and primary angioplasty provide a clinical benefit over in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction, they have not been directly compared. Our aim was to find out whether primary angioplasty was better than prehospital fibrinolysis. METHODS: We did a randomised multicentre trial of 840 patients (of 1200 planned) who presented within 6 h of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, initially managed by mobile emergency-care units. We assigned patients to prehospital fibrinolysis (n=419) with accelerated alteplase or primary angioplasty (n=421), and transferred all to a centre with access to emergency angioplasty. Our primary endpoint was a composite of death, non-fatal reinfarction, and non-fatal disabling stroke at 30 days. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The median delay between onset of symptoms and treatment was 130 min in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 190 min (time to first balloon inflation) in the primary-angioplasty group. Rescue angioplasty was done in 26% of the patients in the fibrinolysis group. The rate of the primary endpoint was 8.2% (34 patients) in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 6.2% (26 patients) in the primary-angioplasty group (risk difference 1.96, 95% CI -1.53 to 5.46). 16 (3.8%) patients assigned prehospital fibrinolysis and 20 (4.8%) assigned primary angioplasty died (p=0.61). INTERPRETATION: A strategy of primary angioplasty was not better than a strategy of prehospital fibrinolysis (with transfer to an interventional facility for possible rescue angioplasty) in patients presenting with early myocardial infarction.

Aged↗