PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eric K Johnson

Publications and source records attributed to Eric K Johnson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas.

PURPOSE: Long-term closure rates of anorectal fistulas using fibrin glue have been disappointing, possibly because of the liquid consistency of the glue. A suturable bioprosthetic plug (Surgisis, Cook Surgical, Inc.) was fashioned to close the primary opening of fistula tracts. A prospective cohort study was performed to compare fibrin glue vs. the anal fistula plug. METHODS: Patients with high transsphincteric fistulas, or deeper, were prospectively enrolled. Patients with Crohn's disease or superficial fistulas were excluded. Age, gender, number and type of fistula tracts, and previous fistula surgeries were compared between groups. Under general anesthesia and in prone jackknife position, the tract was irrigated with hydrogen peroxide. Fistula tracts were occluded by fibrin glue vs. closure of the primary opening using a Surgisis anal fistula plug. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients underwent fibrin glue closure, and 15 used a fistula plug. Patient's age, gender, fistula tract characteristics, and number of previous closure attempts was similar in both groups. In the fibrin glue group, six patients (60 percent) had persistence of one or more fistulas at three months, compared with two patients (13 percent) in the plug group (P < 0.05, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Closure of the primary opening of a fistula tract using a suturable biologic anal fistula plug is an effective method of treating anorectal fistulas. The method seems to be more reliable than fibrin glue closure. The greater efficacy of the fistula plug may be the result of the ability to suture the plug in the primary opening, therefore, closing the primary opening more effectively. Further prospective, long-term studies are warranted.

Bioprosthesis↗

Abdominal wall hernia repair: a long-term comparison of Sepramesh and Dualmesh in a rabbit hernia model.

Surgeons are faced with a wide variety of mesh products, which they can use to perform tension-free abdominal wall hernia repair. The purpose of this study is to compare Sepramesh (SM) and Dualmesh (DM) in terms of strength of tissue incorporation, mesh shrinkage, and adhesiogenesis. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial using 24 New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal underwent creation of a standardized ventral hernia defect and was randomized to receive either SM or DM repair. There were 12 animals in each study arm. Five months postoperatively, the animals were sacrificed and the hernia repairs were analyzed. Specimens were evaluated for strength of incorporation (SOI), mesh shrinkage, as well as the type and amount of adhesions. SOI for DM was not statistically different from SM (37.2N vs 40.8N). DM underwent significantly more shrinkage than did SM (50.8% vs 32.6%, P < 0.0001). Adhesions were predominantly omental in nature. DM demonstrated a greater amount of adhesed area as a percentage of the mesh (30.7% vs 25.2%), but fewer adhesions in terms of absolute area involved (636 mm2 vs 717 mm2). This difference was not statistically significant. Previous studies, terminated at 30 days, demonstrated an increased SOI for SM as compared to DM. This study shows that SOI for DM continues to increase over time such that it is equivalent to DM at 5 months. Though there is increased mesh shrinkage for DM, adhesions to the two materials are equivalent.

Animals↗

Pneumoperitoneum after rough sexual intercourse.

Our objective is to report on a case of nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum and review the mechanism/gynecologic causes of such. We present a case report and review of the literature based on a MEDLINE search using the keywords pneumoperitoneum and nonsurgical. Radiographic evidence of free intraperitoneal air suggests hollow viscus rupture and usually warrants urgent surgical management. Findings of diffuse rebound tenderness and guarding solidify the decision for urgent surgical exploration. We present a case of a patient who presented with all of the above findings that subsequently underwent a negative laparotomy. On the day after surgery she admitted to having had rough sexual intercourse 3 days before presentation. Nonsurgical pneumoperitoneum has a number of unusual causes. Intra-abdominal, thoracic, gynecologic, iatrogenic, and miscellaneous etiologies are encountered. It was determined that the pneumoperitoneum in this case was secondary to rough sexual intercourse. We concluded that pneumoperitoneum secondary to nonsurgical causes represents a diagnostic dilemma. In the patient with free intraperitoneal air on plain X-ray one should be suspicious of less common nonsurgical etiologies. The majority of patients will require laparotomy. Thorough sexual and gynecologic/obstetrical history is a valuable adjunct in identifying the patient who does not.

Adult↗