PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eric L Bulmash

Publications and source records attributed to Eric L Bulmash.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Psychomotor disturbance in depression: assessment using a driving simulator paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Psychomotor disturbance is an essential feature of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and has been associated with impaired functioning on cognitively demanding tasks. Given the psychomotor demands required to navigate a motor vehicle and the disastrous effects of motor vehicles accidents, patients with MDD present a population of clinical interest. The goal of this investigation was to examine the association between MDD and driving ability assessed within a simulated driving paradigm. METHODS: 18 outpatients currently meeting diagnostic criteria for MDD and 29 control participants completed four 30-min simulated driving trials at 10:00 am, 12:00 pm, 2:00 pm, and 4:00 pm. Participants also completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to assess for depression severity and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to assess for everyday sleepiness. RESULTS: After controlling for age and sleepiness, the depressed sample exhibited slower steering reaction times across trials (p<.05) and an increased number of crashes across trials (p<.05) when compared to controls. These differences were characterized by a medium effect size. No significant time-of-day effects were found. LIMITATIONS: MDD patients were free of anti-depressant medication and findings may not generalize to medicated populations. Also, a rural highway driving route was used which may not generalize well to urban driving settings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with untreated MDD demonstrate impaired simulated driving performance. Further research into whether these findings translate into on-the-road impairment is important for public health and safety.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Simulator performance, microsleep episodes, and subjective sleepiness: normative data using convergent methodologies to assess driver drowsiness.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine a novel standardized assessment methodology of detecting impaired driving performance due to drowsiness in a normative cohort. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy subjects with no significant sleep, medical, and psychiatric pathology were assessed in a driving simulation paradigm. Thirty-minute simulations were repeated at two-hourly intervals (i.e., at 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 h). Convergent data sources included drivers' subjective ratings of sleepiness and alertness, electroencephalogram-verified microsleep (MS) episodes, and a variety of real-time driving simulator performance measures such as speed, lane tracking, reaction time (RT), and off-road events (crashes). RESULTS: Significant diurnal fluctuations were noted on objective measures of RT, velocity, tracking, and MS events, indicating the highest risk of impairment in the afternoon. By contrast, subjective ratings of sleepiness and alertness did not demonstrate significant circadian variation. The mean incidence of MS episodes and crash risk correlated highly (r = .748). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates the relevance of multiple convergent measures for comprehensive assessment. The divergence of subjective and objective assays of impairment implies that healthy individuals may not have full insights into neurophysiologically mediated performance deficits. These results will serve as normative comparators to patients presenting with daytime somnolence and may allow a more accurate prediction of potential crash risk than noninteractive daytime polysomnogram tests such as the mean sleep latency test or the maintenance of wakefulness test.

Accidents, Traffic↗