PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eric P Wilkinson

Publications and source records attributed to Eric P Wilkinson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate factors affecting outcomes of small acoustic neuroma (AN) removal via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach, and compare results to published data on observation and radiation therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. METHODS: 162 consecutive patients (ages 19-70) with unilateral AN (0.2-2.5 cm in largest dimension) removed through a MCF approach were reviewed focusing on preservation of hearing, facial nerve function and complications. One hundred thirteen patients had pre-operative word recognition scores (WRS)>70%. RESULTS: Both tumor size and pre-operative WRS were related to post-operative WRS (p<0.01). Overall, at least some hearing was preserved in 94 (60%) of the 156 patients who had hearing before surgery. If the WRS was also >70% (N=113), 56 (50%) maintained WRS>70%. Importantly, WRS for 12 others improved to >70% after surgery. When the patients were stratified by tumor size, the patients with small tumors (2-10 mm) faired better than the overall group. At least some hearing was preserved in 65 (72%) of the 90 patients. If the WRS was also >70% (N=66), 39 (59%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for eight others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor was 1.1-1.4 cm (N=34), the chance of preserving some hearing decreased to 42% (14/33). If the WRS was also >70% (N=23), 9 (39%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for three others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor reached 1.5-2.5 cm (N=35), the hearing preservation rate was 43%. If the WRS was also >70% (N=24), only eight (33%) maintained WRS of 70%, and one other improved to >70%. The addition of intra-operative whole eighth nerve near field monitoring improved results during small tumor ( 70% WRS in 76% (22/29) of those with >70% pre-operative WRS. Good facial nerve function (HB I-II) was achieved in 97% (86% HB I). When tumor size was <or=1.0 cm (N=93), however, good facial nerve function was obtained in 100% (94% HB I). Complications included CSF leak: 9 (5.5%); seizure: 2 (1.2%); and recurrence: 1 (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that removal of unilateral AN through an MCF approach when the tumor is small and hearing is good provides the best opportunity for hearing preservation and normal facial nerve function. Observation historically results in tumor growth in young and middle-age patients with subsequent hearing loss. Radiation may prevent most tumors from growing, and more data are needed to determine long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2005

Canal wall reconstruction tympanomastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the authors' experience with canal wall reconstruction (CWR) tympanomastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration in the treatment of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. STUDY DESIGN: Institutional review board approved retrospective case review. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing CWR tympanomastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration from 1997 to 2004. Data included pre- and postoperative audiometry, findings at second look surgery with ossiculoplasty, and postoperative complications including wound infection and canal wall displacement. RESULTS: One hundred thirty ears in 127 adults and children underwent the procedure. Mean time postoperative was 48 (range 2-94) months. A second look ossiculoplasty was performed in 102 (78%). Percentage of ears that remain safe without evidence of recurrence was 98.5. The postoperative infection rate decreased from an initial rate of 14.3% to 4.5% for the last 88 ears after protocol modification. Recurrence occurred in two (1.5%) patients, requiring conversion to a canal wall down mastoidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A CWR technique can provide improved intraoperative exposure of the middle ear and mastoid without creating a mastoid bowl and reduces the incidence of recurrent disease. A single procedure is used for all patients with acquired cholesteatoma, including children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Case report: Cochlear implant magnet migration.

A 13-month-old cochlear implant recipient underwent routine device activation. Three months postoperatively, the patient sustained a fall with contact to the area of the implant without immediate complication. Ten months postoperatively, the position of the external coil appeared to have moved and the patient did not seem to be responding as well to sound. Audiological testing could not elicit normal device impedances. AP and lateral plain radiographs of the skull revealed migration of the internal magnet from its position within the internal coil to a position over the receiver/stimulator. This is the first known published case of cochlear implant magnet migration.

Cochlear Implants↗
PubMed2002

Implementation, calibration and accuracy testing of an image-enhanced endoscopy system.

This paper presents a new method for image-guided surgery called image-enhanced endoscopy. Registered real and virtual endoscopic images (perspective volume renderings generated from the same view as the endoscope camera using a preoperative image) are displayed simultaneously; when combined with the ability to vary tissue transparency in the virtual images, this provides surgeons with the ability to see beyond visible surfaces and, thus, provides additional exposure during surgery. A mount with four photoreflective spheres is rigidly attached to the endoscope and its position and orientation is tracked using an optical position sensor. Generation of virtual images that are accurately registered to the real endoscopic images requires calibration of the tracked endoscope. The calibration process determines intrinsic parameters (that represent the projection of three-dimensional points onto the two-dimensional endoscope camera imaging plane) and extrinsic parameters (that represent the transformation from the coordinate system of the tracker mount attached to the endoscope to the coordinate system of the endoscope camera), and determines radial lens distortion. The calibration routine is fast, automatic, accurate and reliable, and is insensitive to rotational orientation of the endoscope. The routine automatically detects, localizes, and identifies dots in a video image snapshot of the calibration target grid and determines the calibration parameters from the sets of known physical coordinates and localized image coordinates of the target grid dots. Using nonlinear lens-distortion correction, which can be performed at real-time rates (30 frames per second), the mean projection error is less than 0.5 mm at distances up to 25 mm from the endoscope tip, and less than 1.0 mm up to 45 mm. Experimental measurements and point-based registration error theory show that the tracking error is about 0.5-0.7 mm at the tip of the endoscope and less than 0.9 mm for all points in the field of view of the endoscope camera at a distance of up to 65 mm from the tip. It is probable that much of the projection error is due to endoscope tracking error rather than calibration error. Two examples of clinical applications are presented to illustrate the usefulness of image-enhanced endoscopy. This method is a useful addition to conventional image-guidance systems, which generally show only the position of the tip (and sometimes the orientation) of a surgical instrument or probe on reformatted image slices.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Calibration and accuracy testing for image-enhanced endoscopy.

New surgical navigation techniques may combine the use of live video from a surgical endoscope with 3D volumetrically-reconstructed images of a patient's anatomy. This image-enhanced endoscopy requires calibration of the endoscope to ensure that the mapping of the real endoscope image to its virtual counterpart is properly performed. The application of a technique to calibrate an endoscope prior to use in a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure is described, as well as a simple yet effective linear method for lens-distortion compensation. The results of accuracy testing of the calibration technique using a dedicated testing apparatus are reported.

Calibration↗