PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eric T Moolchan

Publications and source records attributed to Eric T Moolchan.

56 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Sensory and physiologic effects of menthol and non-menthol cigarettes with differing nicotine delivery.

Many smokers choose menthol-flavored cigarettes, however, the influence of menthol on the effects of smoke-delivered nicotine is unknown. Research and commercial cigarettes, menthol and non-menthol, that delivered a wide range of nicotine were evaluated. Menthol (n=18) and non-menthol (n=18) cigarette smokers participated in a single session during which three cigarettes were smoked 45 min apart, in random order. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) nicotine yields of the three cigarettes were: research, low yield, 0.2 mg, commercial cigarettes (average), 1.2 mg; research, high yield, 2.5 mg. Commercial and high-yield cigarettes increased heart rate (HR) and blood pressure more than low-yield cigarettes; although, no differences in exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) occurred. Participants smoked commercial cigarettes faster and with fewer puffs than either of the research cigarette indicating production differences can affect topography. There was a significant group by cigarette interaction on satisfaction, and relief from cigarette craving. High-yield non-menthol cigarettes reduced craving and were rated as more satisfying than high-yield menthol cigarettes. No differences between menthol and non-menthol cigarettes on other subjective measures (strength, psychological reward, negative effects) were observed. Our findings indicate that nicotine delivery, but not mentholation, influences cardiovascular and most subjective measures. These results illustrate the importance of threshold levels of nicotine on subjective responses to cigarette smoking.

Adult↗

The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule: do they diagnose the same smokers?

Two common assessment tools for nicotine dependence are the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) and the Nicotine Dependence section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule [(DIS)-III-R or -IV based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R and -IV, respectively]. The FTND emphasizes morning smoking and overall "heaviness" of smoking. The DSM emphasizes adverse consequences, desire to cut down, and mood changes during withdrawal. We tested (1) how the DSM-III-R diagnosis of Nicotine Dependence is related to FTND score; and (2) how the (a) DSM-III-R or (b) elevated FTND score is related to longer smoking histories, greater psychiatric symptomatology, and tobacco liking scores. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on 370 smokers, the majority (55.9%) of whom had a current DSM-III-R diagnosis of Substance Dependence other than nicotine. All subjects had completed the FTND, the DIS-III-R, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and a survey on drug liking. Agreement statistics were calculated between the DSM-II-R diagnosis of Nicotine Dependence and various cutoff scores values that were assigned as thresholds for nicotine dependence on the FTND. At no cutoff score did the two instruments reliably agree; the highest kappa (at a cutoff of FTND > or = 7) was 0.205. At cutoffs above 5, the FTND diagnosed fewer cases than the DSM-III-R. Multiple regression analysis showed that DSM diagnosis was associated with greater psychiatric symptomatology on the SCL-90-R, while FTND scores were associated with greater tobacco liking. The FTND and the DSM-III-R appear to measure different aspects of the tobacco dependence process. Specifically, the FTND may provide a stronger measure of physical dependence, while the DSM may tap other domains such as awareness of dependence, behaviors resulting from that awareness, and psychiatric symptomatology. Disagreements between the FTND and the DSM are likely to become greater with the changes in the DSM-IV.

Adolescent↗