Biomedical subjects

Erica Liberto

Publications and source records attributed to Erica Liberto.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Headspace-solid-phase microextraction in the analysis of the volatile fraction of aromatic and medicinal plants.

Headspace (HS)-solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has assumed an ever increasing importance as a technique for HS sampling to study the composition of the HS of medicinal and aromatic plants. HS-SPME has mainly been applied for (a) studying the composition of the volatile fraction, including in addition to or as an alternative to other sampling techniques; (b) monitoring the biological phenomena involved with the volatile fraction of a plant; (c) discriminating between species, subspecies, varieties, cultivars, or chemotypes; and (d) quality control of plant samples. A review of 108 articles published during 2000-2005 is presented covering the use of HS-SPME in the field of aromatic and medicinal plants, selection of the most effective fiber and sampling conditions, comparison of HS-SPME and other volatile fraction sample preparation techniques, and the advantages and limits of HS-SPME when applied to medicinal and aromatic plants.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

PubMed2005

Dual-phase twisters: a new approach to headspace sorptive extraction and stir bar sorptive extraction.

The fields of applicability of headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as sorbent have been intensively discussed and widely described. One of the limits of sorptive extraction is that PDMS (i.e. an apolar phase) is the only polymer currently in use making it difficult to recover polar analytes from complex or multi-ingredient matrices and those with very volatile components (C1-C4 analytes). Dual-phase twisters are here introduced as new tools for HSSE and SBSE to overcome the above limits. Dual-phase twisters combine the concentration capabilities of two or more sampling materials operating in different ways (in this case sorption and adsorption). The new twisters consist of a short PDMS tube the ends of which are closed with two magnetic stoppers, thus creating an inner cavity that can be packed with different types of adsorbents like activated carbons. The concentration capability of dual-phase twisters was evaluated by using them for the HSSE and SBSE sampling of a number of matrices in the vegetable, food and environmental fields. The contributions made by different carbons to recovery, repeatability and intermediate precision were also investigated.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMed2005

Impact of phase ratio, polydimethylsiloxane volume and size, and sampling temperature and time on headspace sorptive extraction recovery of some volatile compounds in the essential oil field.

This study evaluates concentration capability of headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE) and the influence of sampling conditions on HSSE recovery of an analyte. A standard mixture in water of six high-to-medium volatility analytes (isobutyl methyl ketone, 3-hexanol, isoamyl acetate, 1,8-cineole, linalool and carvone) was used to sample the headspace by HSSE with stir bars coated with different polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) volumes (20, 40, 55 and 110 microL, respectively), headspace vial volumes (8, 21.2, 40, 250 and 1000 mL), sampling temperatures (25, 50 and 75 degrees C) and sampling times (30, 60 and 120 min, and 4, 8 and 16 h). The concentration factors (CFs) of HSSE versus static headspace (S-HS) were also determined. Analytes sampled by the PDMS stir bars were recovered by thermal desorption (TDS) and analysed by capillary GC-MS. This study demonstrates how analyte recovery depends on its physico-chemical characteristics and affinity for PDMS (octanol-water partition coefficients), sampling temperatures (50 degrees C) and times (60 min), the volumes of headspace (40 mL) and of PDMS (in particular, for high volatility analytes). HSSE is also shown to be very effective for trace analysis. The HSSE CFs calculated versus S-HS with a 1000 mL headspace volumes at 25 degrees C during 4 h sampling ranged between 10(3) and 10(4) times for all analytes investigated while the limits of quantitation determined under the same conditions were in the nmol/L range.

Dimethylpolysiloxanes↗

PubMed2004

Automated headspace solid-phase dynamic extraction to analyse the volatile fraction of food matrices.

High concentration capacity headspace techniques (headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE)) are a bridge between static and dynamic headspace, since they give high concentration factors as does dynamic headspace (D-HS), and are as easy to apply and as reproducible as static headspace (S-HS). In 2000, Chromtech (Idstein, Germany) introduced an inside-needle technique for vapour and liquid sampling, solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE), also known as "the magic needle". In SPDE, analytes are concentrated on a 50 microm film of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and activated carbon (10%) coated onto the inside wall of the stainless steel needle (5 cm) of a 2.5 ml gas tight syringe. When SPDE is used for headspace sampling (HS-SPDE), a fixed volume of the headspace of the sample under investigation is sucked up an appropriate number of times with the gas tight syringe and an analyte amount suitable for a reliable GC or GC-MS analysis accumulates in the polymer coating the needle wall. This article describes the preliminary results of both a study on the optimisation of sampling parameters conditioning HS-SPDE recovery, through the analysis of a standard mixture of highly volatile compounds (beta-pinene, isoamyl acetate and linalool) and of the HS-SPDE-GC-MS analyses of aromatic plants and food matrices. This study shows that HS-SPDE is a successful technique for HS-sampling with high concentration capability, good repeatability and intermediate precision, also when it is compared to HS-SPME.

Food Analysis↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Headspace-solid-phase microextraction fast GC in combination with principal component analysis as a tool to classify different chemotypes of chamomile flower-heads (Matricaria recutita l.).

Headspace-solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-principal component analysis (HS-SPME GC-PCA) is proposed as a complementary or alternative method to essential oil (EO) GC-PCA in order to discriminate between flower-heads of chamomile of different chemotypes. Ninety-two EOs and the headspaces sampled by HS-SPME of the corresponding chamomile flower-heads were examined by conventional GC and fast GC (F-GC) and the results submitted to statistical analysis by PCA. HS-SPME F-GC-PCA showed itself to be a rapid technique by which to distinguish chamomile flower-head chemotypes a produced results in agreement with the accepted EO classification. Using this method, the analysis time was reduced from at least 4.5 h with EO conventional GC to less than 1 h with HS-SPME F-GC. This approach can thus successfully be used as an analytical decision maker in order to reduce the number of time-consuming EO conventional GC analyses by limiting them to those samples that cannot unequivocally be classified. The EO conventional GC and HS-SPME F-GC results of PCA were very uniform, but they did not provide quantitative correlations between the components as determined by the two methods. A different statistical approach and a larger number of samples will be needed in order to correlate components in the headspace sampled by SPME and those in the corresponding EO quantitatively through a function.

Chromatography, Gas↗