PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Erik Blaser

Publications and source records attributed to Erik Blaser.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Binding of motion and colour is early and automatic.

At what stages of the human visual hierarchy different features are bound together, and whether this binding requires attention, is still highly debated. We used a colour-contingent motion after-effect (CCMAE) to study the binding of colour and motion signals. The logic of our approach was as follows: if CCMAEs can be evoked by targeted adaptation of early motion processing stages, without allowing for feedback from higher motion integration stages, then this would support our hypothesis that colour and motion are bound automatically on the basis of spatiotemporally local information. Our results show for the first time that CCMAE's can be evoked by adaptation to a locally paired opposite-motion dot display, a stimulus that, importantly, is known to trigger direction-specific responses in the primary visual cortex yet results in strong inhibition of the directional responses in area MT of macaques as well as in area MT+ in humans and, indeed, is perceived only as motionless flicker. The magnitude of the CCMAE in the locally paired condition was not significantly different from control conditions where the different directions were spatiotemporally separated (i.e. not locally paired) and therefore perceived as two moving fields. These findings provide evidence that adaptation at an early, local motion stage, and only adaptation at this stage, underlies this CCMAE, which in turn implies that spatiotemporally coincident colour and motion signals are bound automatically, most probably as early as cortical area V1, even when the association between colour and motion is perceptually inaccessible.

Afterimage↗

Object-based cross-feature attentional modulation from color to motion.

Object-based theories of visual attention predict that attempting to direct attention to a particular attribute of a visual object will result in an automatic selection of the whole object, including all of its features. It has been assumed, but not critically tested, that the spreading of attention from one feature to another in this manner, i.e. cross-feature attentional (CFA) effects, takes place at object-level stages of processing as opposed to early, local stages. In the present study we disambiguated these options for color-to-motion CFA by contrasting attention's effect on bivectorial transparent versus bivectorial locally paired motion displays. We found that association between features at the global, but not at the local, stage of motion processing leads to cross-feature attentional effects. These findings provide strong psychophysical evidence that such effects are indeed object-based.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Motion integration during motion aftereffects.

The perceived global motion of a stimulus depends on how its different local motion-direction vectors are distributed in space and time. When they are explicitly co-localized, as in the case of locally paired motion, competitive motion integration mechanisms produce a unitary global motion direction determined by their vector average. During motion aftereffects induced by simultaneous adaptation to multiple motion directions, just as in the case of locally paired motion, different directional signals originate simultaneously from exactly the same position in space. Therefore, the perceived global motion direction during motion aftereffects results from local vector averaging of the co-localized motion-direction signals induced by adaptation.

Journal Article↗

The conjunction of feature and depth information.

By inducing feature-contingent depth aftereffects, we show that the human visual system combines feature information with depth information. These contingent aftereffects were revealed through the use of a novel selective adaptation paradigm whose stimuli required the combination of feature and depth information in order to segment two interleaved, transparent surfaces. We argue that this combined processing exemplifies the remarkable resourcefulness of a visual system that has adapted to exploit conjunctions of cues that can aid in the segmentation of visual surfaces.

Adaptation, Biological↗