Biomedical subjects

Erika Huber

Publications and source records attributed to Erika Huber.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Validity and sensitivity to change of the NASS questionnaire for patients with cervical spine disorders.

STUDY DESIGN: Study of two cohorts with a differing severity of disease before and after treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and sensitivity to change of the German version of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' best knowledge, there are no data revealing the psychometric properties of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The validity and sensitivity in patients with cervical spine disorders who were referred by their physician either to an inpatient rehabilitation program or to an outpatient physiotherapy were examined. They were consecutively recruited. Their functioning and health status were assessed when entering the study and after the treatment by the NASS questionnaire and the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: Criterion validity was demonstrated by the statistically significant correlations between the NASS subscores and all subscores of SF-36. As expected, the SF-36 subscores Physical Function and Pain showed the strongest associations to the NASS subscore Pain and Disability (rho = 0.75 and 0.65, respectively), demonstrating construct validity of the latter. Discriminative validity of NASS subscores was shown in two ways. First, a statistically significant difference was found between functional and health status of the two cohorts with better scores in the patients referred to outpatient physiotherapy as compared with those sent to an inpatient rehabilitation program. Second, statistically significant and clinically important improvements recorded by the NASS subscores were demonstrated in both patient groups after the treatment in accordance with improved SF-36 subscores. Moreover, the NASS subscores demonstrated good sensitivity to change (Pain and Disability with a standard response mean ranging from 0.64 to 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the cervical NASS patient questionnaire (NASS) is a valid instrument for patients with cervical spine health problems. As this instrument is also sensitive to change, it is recommended for use. Moreover, the present study gives evidence for the validity of the original cervical NASS questionnaire in English.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

PubMed2004

ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the results of the consensus process integrating evidence from preliminary studies to develop the first version of a Comprehensive ICF Core Set and a Brief ICF Core Set for osteoarthritis. METHODS: A formal decision-making and consensus process integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies was followed. Preliminary studies included a Delphi exercise, a systematic review, and an empirical data collection. After training in the ICF and based on these preliminary studies relevant ICF categories were identified in a formal consensus process by international experts from different backgrounds. RESULTS: The preliminary studies identified a set of 388 ICF categories at the second, third, and fourth ICF levels with 144 categories on body functions, 49 on body structures; 165 on activities and participation, and 43 on environmental factors. Seventeen experts from 7 different countries attended the consensus conference on osteoarthritis. Altogether 55 second-level categories were included in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set with 13 categories from the component body functions, 6 from body structures, 19 from activities and participation, and 17 from environmental factors. The Brief ICF Core Set included a total of 13 second-level categories (3 on body functions, 3 on body structures, 3 on activities and participation, and 4 on environmental factors). CONCLUSION: A formal consensus process integrating evidence and expert opinion based on the ICF framework and classification led to the definition of ICF Core Sets for osteoarthritis. Both the Comprehensive ICF Core Set and the Brief ICF Core Set were defined.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

ICF Core Sets for obesity.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the results of the consensus process integrating evidence from preliminary studies to develop the first version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set and the Brief ICF Core Set for obesity. METHODS: A formal decision-making and consensus process integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies was followed. Preliminary studies included a Delphi exercise, a systematic review and an empirical data collection. After training in the ICF and based on these preliminary studies relevant ICF categories were identified in a formal consensus process by international experts from different backgrounds. RESULTS: The preliminary studies identified a set of 219 ICF categories at the second, third and fourth ICF levels with 87 categories on body functions, 34 on body structures, 53 on activities and participation and 45 on environmental factors. Twenty-one experts attended the consensus conference on obesity (18 physicians with various sub-specializations and 3 physical therapists). Altogether 109 categories (108 second-level and one third-level categories) were included in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set with 30 categories from the component body functions, 18 from body structures, 28 from activities and participation and 33 from environmental factors. The Brief ICF Core Set included a total of 9 second-level categories with 3 on body functions, 4 on activities and participation and 2 on environmental factors. No body-structures categories were included in the Brief ICF Core Set. CONCLUSION: A formal consensus process integrating evidence and expert opinion based on the ICF framework and classification led to the definition of ICF Core Sets for obesity. Both the Comprehensive ICF Core Set and the Brief ICF Core Set were defined.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2002

Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine.

The authors developed an instrument called the "Rehabilitation Problem-Solving Form" (RPS-Form), which allows health care professionals analyze patient problems, to focus on specific targets, and to relate the salient disabilities to relevant and modifiable variables. In particular, the RPS-Form was designed to address the patients' perspectives and enhance their participation in the decision-making process. Because the RPS-Form is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Model of Functioning and Disability, it could provide a common language for the description of human functioning and therefore facilitates multidisciplinary responsibility and coordination of interventions. The use of the RPS-Form in clinical practice is demonstrated by presenting an application case of a patient with a chronic pain syndrome.

Arthritis↗