Biomedical subjects

Erin K Cressman

Publications and source records attributed to Erin K Cressman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes.

Shapes that are rendered invisible through backward masking are still able to influence motor responses: this is called masked priming. Yet it is unknown whether this influence is on the control of ongoing action, or whether it merely influences the initiation of an already-programmed action. We modified a masked priming procedure (Schmidt, 2002) such that the critical prime-mask sequence was displayed during the execution of an already-initiated goal-directed pointing movement. Psychophysical tests of prime visibility indicated that the identity of the prime shapes were not accessible to participants for conscious report. Yet detailed kinematic analysis of the finger in motion revealed that masked primes had an influence on the pointing trajectories within 277ms of their appearance, 56ms earlier than the trajectory deviations observed in response to the visible masks. These results indicate that subliminal shapes can indeed influence the control of ongoing motor activity.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Temporal uncertainty does not affect response latencies of movements produced during startle reactions.

Previous research has shown that a startle 'go' stimulus, presented at a constant latency with respect to a warning stimulus, is capable of eliciting an intended voluntary movement in a simple reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (Carlsen et al. in Exp Brain Res 152:510-518, 2003; J Motor Behav 36:253-264, 2004a; Exp Brain Res 159:301-309 2004b; Valls-Solé et al. in J Physiol 516:931-938, 1999). The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect of temporal uncertainty on response latency during an RT task that comprised a startle stimulus. Participants were required to perform an active 20 degrees wrist extension movement in response to an auditory tone that was presented 2,500 to 5,500 ms after a warning stimulus, in 1,000 ms increments. On certain trials the control auditory stimulus (80 dB) was unexpectedly replaced by the startle stimulus (124 dB). When participants were startled the intended voluntary movement was initiated at approximately 70 ms, regardless of foreperiod duration. The magnitude and invariance of response latencies to the startle stimulus suggest that the intended movement had indeed been prepared prior to the arrival of the imperative go stimulus, within 2.5 s of the warning stimulus. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the prepared movement decayed over a period of at least 3 s.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

No automatic pilot for visually guided aiming based on colour.

It has been claimed that visually guided limb movements are automatically corrected in response to a change in target location but not when the same change in target is cued through a colour switch (Pisella et al. 2000). These findings were based solely on limb endpoint data. Here we examine the kinematic trajectory of the hand during the entire movement. Participants pointed rapidly to a target object that could change position either by changing spatial location, or by switching colour with a second object. Participants performed in two instructional conditions: a "go" condition to index intentional movements and a "stop" condition in which failures to stop pointing indexed automatic limb guidance. Kinematic analysis indicated efficient intentional pointing in both location and colour change conditions. However, only targets that changed spatial location elicited involuntary limb modifications and these occurred within 150 ms of the change. This conclusion held even after baseline differences in the efficiency of processing colour-defined targets were taken into account, thereby strengthening the claim of a strongly automatic pilot for visually guided limb movements.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Identifying visual-vestibular contributions during target-directed locomotion.

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the potential interaction between visual and vestibular inputs as participants walked towards 1 of 3 targets located on a barrier 5m away. Visual and vestibular inputs were perturbed with displacing prisms and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), respectively. For each target there were three vision conditions (no prisms, prisms left, and prisms right), and three GVS conditions (no GVS, anode left, and anode right). Participants were instructed to start with eyes closed, and to open the eyes at heel contact of the first step. GVS and target illumination were triggered by the first heel contact. This ensured that the upcoming visual condition and target were unknown and that both sensory perturbations occurred simultaneously. Lateral displacement was determined every 40 cm. Irrespective of target or direction, GVS or prism perturbation alone resulted in similar lateral deviations. When combined, the GVS and prism perturbations that had similar singular effects led to significantly larger deviations in the direction of the perturbations. The deviations were approximately equal to the sum of the single deviations indicating that the combined effects were additive. Conflicting GVS and prism perturbations led to significantly smaller deviations that were close to zero, indicating that opposite perturbations cancelled each other. These results show that when both visual and vestibular information remain important during task performance, the nervous system integrates the inputs equally.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Assessing vestibular contributions during changes in gait trajectory.

Displacing prisms and galvanic stimulation were used to examine visual-vestibular interactions during target-directed gait. Participants walked towards a wall 6 m away. After taking four steps, a target on the wall, located directly in front or to the right of the participant, was illuminated. Participants continued walking towards the target. Galvanic vestibular stimulation was triggered at either gait initiation, a step before the potential turn, or at target illumination. Although the visual and vestibular perturbations significantly altered gait trajectory, the greatest interaction occurred when galvanic stimulation was triggered one step before the target appeared. This implies an increase in the weighting of vestibular inputs just before turning to prepare for the potential change in direction.

Adult↗