The Southwestern Surgical Congress: a seal of approval.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Ernest Dunn.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Improvements in immunosuppression have increased patient and graft survival in transplant recipients. As a result, there is greater risk of neoplastic processes such as breast cancer. Treatment in this population is complicated by the necessary immunosuppression, vascular accesses, and transplant grafts. General surgeons may expect to encounter more of these complex patients in the community setting. We sought to evaluate the surgical treatment of breast cancer in patients with renal transplants. Hospital and private physician records were queried to identify patients who developed breast cancer after a renal or pancreatic/renal transplantation. These charts were reviewed for demographics, type of breast cancer and treatment, location of dialysis access, and complications. From June 1, 1994, to May 31, 2004, 14 patients were identified. Eight patients had functioning transplants. All patients underwent operative interventions. Ten patients underwent adjuvant treatment. Three had functioning transplants and chose not to risk the graft with cessation of immunotherapy. However, no patient with functioning transplants who underwent chemotherapy developed organ failure. Breast cancer after transplantation poses a unique dilemma. The threat of transplanted organ failure is a major concern to these patients and often supersedes adjuvant therapies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of multitrauma patients for blunt truncal injuries remains open for debate. We sought to evaluate the role of routine computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis as a screening tool for patients already undergoing cranial CT studies. METHODS: Charts of blunt trauma patients admitted from June 2000 to June 2001 were reviewed for demographics, Glascow Coma Scale (GCS), physical and radiological findings, and length of stay. RESULTS: Our study found that 38% of patients undergoing cranial CT scanning had a unexpected finding on body scans. Changes were made in 26% of the study group because results found on the adjuvant CTs. CONCLUSIONS: Additional body CTs add minimal cost to the care of trauma patients but can significantly change the management. We believe it is beneficial to perform routine body CT examinations when performing cranial imaging for blunt head injury.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become increasingly utilized in the trauma setting. When properly applied, it offers several advantages, including reduced morbidity, lower rates of negative laparotomy, and shortened length of hospital stay. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the management of trauma patients with penetrating abdominal injuries. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year retrospective chart review of 4541 trauma patients admitted to our urban Level II trauma center. Penetrating abdominal injuries accounted for 209 of these admissions. Patients were divided into 3 treatment groups based on the characteristics of their abdominal injuries. Management was either observation, immediate laparotomy, or screening laparoscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were observed in the Emergency Department based on their initial physical examination and radiologic studies. After Emergency Department evaluation, 154 patients underwent immediate laparotomy. In this group, 119 therapeutic laparotomies, 11 nontherapeutic laparotomies, and 24 negative laparotomies were performed. A review of the negative laparotomies revealed that possibly 8 of 10 gun shot wounds and all 14 stab wounds could have been done laparoscopically. Twenty-two patients underwent laparoscopic evaluation, 9 of which were converted to open procedures. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical techniques are particularly helpful as a screening tool for anterior abdominal wall wounds and lower chest injuries to rule out peritoneal penetration. Increased use of laparoscopy in select patients with penetrating abdominal trauma will decrease the rate of negative and nontherapeutic laparotomies, thus lowering morbidity and decreasing length of hospitalization. As technology and expertise among surgeons continues to improve, more therapeutic intervention may be done laparoscopically in the future.
BACKGROUND: Spillage of gallstones within the subcutaneous tissue during laparoscopic cholecystecomy may lead to considerable morbidity. METHODS: We describe an abdominal wall abscess formation in a 50-year-old female that developed 24 months after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Spilled gallstones at the umbilical port site went undetected. Subsequently, an umbilical port-site abscess formed and was treated 2 years later. CONCLUSION: Any patient with a foreign body in the subcutaneous tissues after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be considered to have a retained stone. Use careful dissection, copious irrigation, and a retrieval device to avoid stone spillage. If spillage does occurs, percutaneous drainage and antibiotics followed by open retrieval of the stones should achieve adequate results during those delayed presentations of abdominal wall abscesses.