PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ernest Moy

Publications and source records attributed to Ernest Moy.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

National data for monitoring and evaluating racial and ethnic health inequities: where do we go from here?

The elimination of racial and ethnic health inequities has become a central focus of health education and the national health agenda. The documentation of an increasing gap in life expectancy and other health outcomes suggests the need for more effective strategies to eliminate health inequities, which can be informed by better monitoring and evaluation data. Although the sophistication and volume of health data available have increased dramatically in recent years, this article examines the quality of the current data collected to achieve the goal of eliminating racial and ethnic health inequities. This article explores several key aspects of data to inform addressing inequities including terminology, the role of data, and explanations of the problem. The authors conclude with recommendations for refining data collection to facilitate the elimination of racial and ethnic health inequities and suggest how the Society for Public Health Education can become a more central figure in our national efforts.

Ethnicity↗
PubMed2005

The national healthcare quality and disparities reports: an overview.

BACKGROUND: Congress directed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to lead an effort for the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to develop 2 annual reports: a National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR) and a National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR). OBJECTIVES: This article lays out key concepts, definitions, statistical methods, and findings from these first ever national reports on quality and disparities. We also summarize some possible future directions for the reports. RESEARCH DESIGN: The NHQR and NHDR rely on secondary analysis of available data from over 40 established, national databases. The NHQR presents data at the national level, by sociodemographic characteristics, and at the state level. The NHDR presents data broken out by race/ethnicity and by socioeconomic status. MEASURES: The 2003 NHQR presented data on approximately 140 quality measures and the NHDR presented data on these same measures plus approximately 100 measures of access to care. RESULTS: The reports found that high healthcare quality is not a given and that disparities are pervasive throughout the US healthcare system. In addition, they found the quality and disparities issues are particularly apparent in preventive care, but that greater improvement is possible. CONCLUSIONS: As these reports evolve for the 2004 version and beyond, they will be a vital step in the effort to improve healthcare quality for all populations in the United States.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Measurement challenges in developing the national healthcare quality report and the national healthcare disparities report.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe 2 measurement challenges faced in the development of the National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR) and the National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR): the use of federal data on race and ethnicity and the selection of measures of socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: Over 30 federal and nonfederal data systems were examined to identify measures of race, ethnicity, and SES and to evaluate the characteristics and relative quality of the data. RESULTS: The availability and quality of data on race, ethnicity, and SES vary by factors such as the type of data (population or establishment based-survey, administrative/claims data, or vital statistics), the source of information (self, proxy, other, or some combination), and the transition to new federal standards. No single measure of SES could be identified, so a mix of measures is presented, including income, education, and expected source of payment (ESOP). Income relative to federal poverty level was used as the preferred SES measure from person-based surveys. Selected analyses linking hospital discharge data to annual median household income from US census data were presented for data derived from administrative data systems. Educational attainment was the variable used for examining SES using data from the Vital Statistics System. CONCLUSIONS: The first NHQR and NHDR maximized the presentation of data by accommodating the variation among data systems while at the same time imposing some standardization in the coding and classification of data on race, ethnicity, and SES.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in estimates of AHRQ patient safety indicators.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety events that result from the happenstance of mistakes and errors should not occur systematically across racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial and ethnic differences in patient safety events disappear when income (a proxy for socioeconomic status) is taken into account. RESEARCH DESIGN: This study analyzes administrative data from community hospitals in 16 states with reliable race/ethnicity measures in the 2000 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), using the publicly available AHRQ patient safety indicators (PSIs). RESULTS: Different indicators show different results for different racial/ethnic subgroups. Many events with higher rates for non-Hispanic blacks (compared with non-Hispanic whites) remain higher when income is taken into account, although such differences for Hispanics or Asian/Pacific Islanders (APIs) tend to disappear. Many events with lower rates for Hispanics and APIs remain lower than whites when income is taken into account, but for blacks, they disappear. DISCUSSION: The higher rates for minorities that reflect the way health care is delivered raise troubling questions about potential racial/ethnic bias and discrimination in the US health care system, problems with cultural sensitivity and effective communication, and access to high-quality health care providers. CONCLUSIONS: The AHRQ PSIs are a broad screen for potential safety events that point to needed improvement in the quality of care for specific populations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Children's Health Care in the First National Healthcare Quality Report and National Healthcare Disparities Report.

BACKGROUND: The first National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR) and National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR) are landmark events for children's health care quality and are expected to stimulate local measurement, benchmarking, and quality improvement efforts. METHOD: The authors select findings from the NHQR and NHDR, focusing on topics reflecting a range of health care and health care settings affecting children. They highlight disparities by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance source. They critique the first NHQR and NHDR from a child health perspective. SELECT NHQR/DR FINDINGS: Quality-of-care issues in the effectiveness domain were identified for black infant mortality, low and very low birth weight rates, antibiotic use for the common cold, and childhood hospitalizations for asthma. Immunization rates have improved. Patient centeredness and timeliness results vary by race, ethnicity and income. The NHDR found that Hispanic and low-income children are most likely to be uninsured for part of the year. Groups of children most likely to have public coverage are American Indian/Alaska native, black, and Hispanic. CRITIQUE OF REPORTS: The structure and criteria used for the first reports limit their usefulness from a child health perspective. A basic problem is that the conceptualizations of health and health care that are driving national initiatives on quality are based largely on an adult chronic care model focused on conditions with high expenditures as treated in the mainstream health care delivery system. CONCLUSION: NHQR and NHDR provide essential information on children's health care quality. Future reports can be improved by including child-relevant perspectives in priority-setting and data-gathering efforts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Variation in quality of men's health care by race/ethnicity and social class.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, minority and poor men have been characterized as "an invisible population," overlooked by public and private efforts to improve the health status of women, children, and the elderly. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the health care experiences of racial and ethnic minority men with that of white men, and low socioeconomic status with those of higher status. MEASURES/SUBJECTS: Quality-of-care measures in multiple clinical domains are evaluated. The authors use data from several databases, including the National Health Interview Survey, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and Health Care Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database. The relative difference between each racial/ethnic and socioeconomic group and a fixed reference group is used to assess differences in use of services. Statistical significance is assessed using z tests. RESULTS: Hispanic men were much less likely to receive colorectal cancer screening (relative risk [RR] range, 0.61-0.69), cardiovascular risk factor screening and management (RR, 0.84-0.88), and vaccinations (RR, 0.47-0.94). Black and Asian men were significantly less likely to have received selected preventive services (adult immunization and colorectal cancer screening). The differences in end-stage renal disease care that black and white men received were statistically significant (RR, 0.39-0.97), with black men consistently receiving worse care. For some measures of management of end-stage renal disease, Asian men received care that was similar to or better than that received by non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSION: Minority men are at a markedly elevated risk for the receipt of poor health care quality. However, generalizations about "minority" men are likely to be misleading and incomplete. There is a considerable variation in the magnitude, direction, and significance of these risks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Heart disease and prevention: race and age differences in heart disease prevention, treatment, and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze race and age differences in the distribution of health promotion and cardiovascular screening tests, and the prevalence of serious heart disease and cardiovascular mortality in the United States. DATA SOURCES/STUDY POPULATION: Data are from 7 federal datasets represented in the first National Healthcare Quality Report and the National Healthcare Disparities Report, and include surveys, administrative and vital statistics data systems. The study analyzes blacks and whites. MEASURES: Counseling on diet and nutrition, exercise, and tobacco during an outpatient visit indicate the availability of health promotion services, and screening for high blood pressure and cholesterol represent preventive services. Hospitalizations for heart-related conditions and use of certain cardiac procedures identify serious heart disease. Deaths from coronary artery disease and stroke are the heart-related mortality measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Counseling and education services tend to occur more on outpatient visits by individuals aged 45 to 64 years than in younger age groups. Screening rates among individuals aged 45 to 64 years of approximately 90% for hypertension and 80% for high cholesterol suggest progress in early detection of cardiac risk factors. However, blacks aged 45 to 64 years are 5.6 times more likely than their white counterparts to be hospitalized for hypertension, approximately one third less likely to receive a cardiac procedure, and almost twice as likely to die of coronary heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although findings indicate few racial differences in health promotion services in ambulatory care or screening for cardiac risk factors, the prevalence of serious cardiovascular disease, use of cardiac procedures, and heart-related mortality suggest continuing racial disparities in heart disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Preparing the national healthcare disparities report: gaps in data for assessing racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health care.

BACKGROUND: Efforts to quantify, monitor, understand, and reduce disparities in health care are critically dependent on the collection of high-quality data that support such analyses. In producing the first National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR), a number of gaps in data were encountered that limited the ability to assess racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health care. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify and quantify gaps in data related to disparities in health care and discuss efforts to fill these gaps in future NHDRs. FINDINGS: : Data on specific racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups were often not collected or collected in formats that differed from federal standards. When collected, data were often insufficient to generate reliable estimates for specific racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. These effects were magnified when attempting to assess disparities within many of the agency's priority populations such as women, children, the elderly, low-income populations, and rural residents. Future NHDRs begin to fill some of these gaps in data, but some gaps will likely persist and new gaps will likely arise as the availability of data for specific populations vary from year to year. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in data limit the ability to address racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health care. Although many federal efforts are underway to improve data collection, some groups and populations pose unique challenges for data collection that will be difficult to overcome.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Assessing the nation's progress toward elimination of disparities in health care.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality submitted the first annual National Healthcare Disparities Report to Congress in December, 2003. This first report will provide a snapshot of the state of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in access and quality of care in America. It examines disparities in the general population and within the Agency's priority populations. While focused on extant data, the first report will form the foundation for future versions, which examines causes of disparities and shape solutions to the problem. As patient advocates and agents of change, primary care physicians play a critical role in efforts to eliminate disparities in health care. Continuing participation by primary care physicians in the development and refinement of the National Healthcare Disparities Report is essential.

Ethnicity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure associated with comorbidities.

This paper provides important insights on gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in a Medicare population in terms of the quality of care received for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and congestive heart failure (CHF) in association with diabetes or hypertension/end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Both race/ethnicity and gender are associated with differences in the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of Medicare recipients with these conditions. In the AMI group, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients of both genders were less likely to receive aspirin or beta-blockers than non-Hispanic Whites. These differences persisted for Hispanic women and men even when they presented with ESRD or diabetes. Rates for smoking cessation counseling were among the lowest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics with AMI-diabetes and non-Hispanic blacks with AMI-hypertension/ESRD. Gender comparisons within racial groups for the AMI and AMI-diabetes groups show that among non-Hispanic Whites, women were less likely to receive aspirin and beta-blockers. No gender differences were noted among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Medicare recipients. In the CHF group, Hispanics were the racial/ethnic group least likely to have an assessment of left ventricular function (LVF), even if they had diabetes and had lower rates of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy or even if they had combined CHF-hypertension/ESRD. Gender comparisons in both the CHF and CHF-hypertension/ESRD groups show that non-Hispanic White women were less likely to have an LVF assessment than non-Hispanic White men. Among all subjects, having comorbidities with AMI was not associated with higher markers of quality cardiovascular care. Closing the many gaps in cardiovascular care must target the specific needs of women and men across racial and ethnic groups.

Black or African American↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in the quality of care for diabetes.

High-quality care for diabetes is based on proper prevention, coordination of care among a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals, enhanced patient-provider relationships, and patient self-management skills. This paper discusses gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in the quality of care for type 2 diabetes according to 10 measures defined by the National Healthcare Quality Report and the National Healthcare Disparities Report. These measures include 5 process measures and one composite measure derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and 4 outcome measures derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. National rates for 2 process measures--measurement of HbA1c (women 89.70% versus men 90.10%) and lipid profile (women 92.9% versus men 95.3%)--are high, but only 28.9% of women and 33.9% of men with diabetes received all 5 recommended process measures (HbA1c, lipid profile, eye exam, foot exam, and influenza immunization). Screening rates for retinal and foot exams and influenza immunization should be improved for all, but the need is particularly urgent for Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks. Women and men have similar rates of hospital admissions for uncontrolled diabetes, but rates for lower extremity amputations were higher for men, particularly non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. Avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes decreased as income increased across racial/ethnic groups, but other factors (e.g., quality of primary care, age, relationship with providers, patients' self-management skills) may influence such rates. Moreover, any improvements in the diabetes outcomes measures may lag many years behind any measurable improvements in quality of care. Well-designed interventions that reallocate resources for diabetes self-care should be developed to ensure that gender differences are addressed across racial/ethnic groups. Because much of this care involves the management of risk factors, self-management education should be tailored to the lifestyles and beliefs specific to gender and racial/ethnic groups.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The quality challenge.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Health Services Accessibility↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Racial and ethnic differences in patient assessments of interactions with providers: disparities or measurement biases?

Patient assessment surveys have established a primary role in health care quality measurement as evidence has shown that information from patients can affect quality improvement for practitioners and lead to positive marketwide changes. This article presents findings from the recently released National Healthcare Disparities Report revealing that although most clinical quality and access indicators show superior health care for non-Hispanic whites compared with blacks and Hispanics, blacks and Hispanics assess their interactions with providers more positively than non-Hispanic whites do. The article explores possible explanations for these racial/ethnic differences, including potential pitfalls in survey design that draw biased responses by race/ethnicity. The article then suggests strategies for refining future research on racial/ethnic disparities based on patient assessment of health care.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Limits to the safety net: teaching hospital faculty report on their patients' access to care.

Many major teaching hospitals might not be able to offer adequate access to specialty care for uninsured patients. This study found that medical school faculty were more likely to have difficulty obtaining specialty services for uninsured than for privately insured patients. These gaps in access were similar in magnitude for public and private institutions. Initial treatment of uninsured patients at academic health centers (AHCs) does not guarantee access to specialty and other referral services, which suggests that there are limits to relying on a health care safety net for uninsured patients. AHCs and affiliated group practices should examine policies that limit access for uninsured patients.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Compiling the evidence: the National Healthcare Disparities Reports.

Disparities in health care have been described extensively in the literature. The next step in resolving this national problem is to develop the necessary infrastructure for monitoring and tracking disparities. The congressionally mandated National Healthcare Disparities Report begins to build this infrastructure. The 2003 report addressed many of the methodological challenges inherent in measuring disparities. The recently released 2004 report continues the process by summarizing the status of U.S. health care disparities and beginning to track changes over time. Both reports emphasize the need to integrate activities to reduce disparities and to improve the quality of health care.

Data Collection↗