Biomedical subjects

Ernst-Peter Horn

Publications and source records attributed to Ernst-Peter Horn.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Ryanodine contracture threshold times for diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: an experimental approach from a single laboratory.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To define threshold times for ryanodine contracture testing (RCT) using skeletal muscle specimens from malignant hyperthermia-susceptible (MHS) and control individuals. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) laboratory at a university hospital. PATIENTS: 8 patients with previous fulminant MH and 53 control patients undergoing in vitro contracture test (IVCT) for diagnosis of MH susceptibility. INTERVENTIONS: Biopsies of the quadriceps femoris muscle were performed with a 3-in-1 nerve block, with spinal anesthesia, or with trigger-free general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were classified as MHS, MH normal (MHN), or MH equivocal (MHE) by the IVCT according to the protocol of the European MH Group (EMHG). Ryanodine 1 microM was added as a bolus to the organ bath to extra vital muscle specimens. Contracture levels were defined as: 1 = start of contracture (OT; min); 2 = time (min) to reach a contracture of 2 mN, and 3 = time (min) to reach a contracture of 10 mN. The effects of ryanodine on contracture responses were measured. Ryanodine induced contractures in all specimens. MHS specimens reached all defined contracture levels significantly sooner than did the controls. Ryanodine contracture test enables a clear discrimination of MHS specimens from controls at contracture levels of OT and 2 mN, whereas at 10 mN a small overlap was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using this test, which is an experimental approach from a single laboratory, an assignment to MHS or MHN is possible. To define contracture levels for RCT more precisely and to agree on commonly used thresholds, multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients are required.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia reduces analgesic requirements compared to continuous epidural infusion after major abdominal surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of pain relief and incidence of side effects between 24-hr postoperative continuous epidural infusion (CEI) and subsequent patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different analgesics after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Twenty-eight women undergoing extended gynecological tumour surgery received postoperative CEI with 0.15 mL x kg(-1) x hr(-1) 0.2% ropivacaine (R: n = 14) or 0.125% bupivacaine plus 0.5 micro g x mL(-1) sufentanil (BS: n = 14) during 24 postoperative hours. Twenty-four hours later, postoperative pain management was switched to PCEA without background infusion and 5 mL single bolus application of R or BS every 20 min at most. Visual analogue scales (VAS; 1-100 mm) were assessed by patients at rest and on coughing after 24 hr of CEI and PCEA. Side effects, doses of local anesthetics and opioids were recorded and plasma concentrations of total and unbound ropivacaine and bupivacaine were measured. RESULTS: Patients required lower doses of each respective analgesic medication with PCEA (R: 108 +/- 30 mL; BS: 110 +/- 28 mL) than with CEI (R: 234 +/- 40; BS: 260 +/- 45; P < 0.01). Ropivacaine plasma concentrations were lower 24 hr after PCEA when compared with CEI (P < 0.01). No patient after PCEA but two after CEI (n = 4; NS) presented motor block. PCEA with R provided better postoperative pain relief than CEI (37 +/- 32 vs 59+/-27, P < 0.05). No difference in parenteral opioid rescue medication between CEI and PCEA was seen. CONCLUSION: PCEA in comparison to preceding CEI provides equivalent analgesia with lower local anesthetic doses and plasma levels, and without motor blocking side effects, irrespective of the applied drug regimen.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Active warming during cesarean delivery.

UNLABELLED: We tested the hypothesis that 15 min of forced-air prewarming, combined with intraoperative warming, prevents hypothermia and shivering in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. We simultaneously tested the hypothesis that maintaining maternal normothermia increases newborn temperature, umbilical vein pH, and Apgar scores. Thirty patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to forced-air warming or to passive insulation. Warming started 15 min before the induction of epidural anesthesia. Core temperature was measured at the tympanic membrane, and shivering was graded by visual inspection. Patients evaluated their thermal sensation with visual analog scales. Rectal temperature and umbilical pH were measured in the infants after birth. Results were compared with unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-tests and chi(2) tests. Core temperatures after 2 h of anesthesia were greater in the actively warmed (37.1 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C) than in the unwarmed (36.0 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C; P < 0.01) patients. Shivering was observed in 2 of 15 warmed and 9 of 15 unwarmed mothers (P < 0.05). Babies of warmed mothers had significantly greater core temperatures (37.1 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C vs 36.2 degrees C +/- 0.6 degrees C) and umbilical vein pH (7.32 +/- 0.07 vs 7.24 +/- 0.07). IMPLICATIONS: Perioperative forced-air warming of women undergoing cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia prevents maternal and fetal hypothermia, reduces maternal shivering, and improves umbilical vein pH.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Patient-controlled thoracic epidural infusion with ropivacaine 0.375% provides comparable pain relief as bupivacaine 0.125% plus sufentanil after major abdominal gynecologic tumor surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that an opioid-free local anesthetic alone is able to provide comparable analgesia to the opioid supplemented epidural application of local anesthetics using thoracic epidural catheters after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study, we have compared the analgesic efficacy and side effects of ropivacaine 0.375% (group R) versus bupivacaine 0.125% in combination with sufentanil 0.5 microg/mL(-1) (group B/S) via a thoracic epidural catheter for a duration of 96 hours after major abdominal surgery in 30 gynecologic tumor patients. Piritramide was given for breakthrough pain. Assessments were performed every 12 hours after start of the epidural infusion using continuous (first 24 hours) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (24 to 96 hours). RESULTS: No differences were seen in demographic and perioperative data. Dynamic pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS] values) were comparable between groups during mobilization (group R v group B/S: 24 hours: 40 +/- 30 v 36 +/- 14, P =.9; 48 hours: 46 +/- 33 v 42 +/- 25, P =.93; 72 hours: 42 +/- 24 v 48 +/- 26, P =.78; 96 hours: 42 +/- 25 v 29 +/- 28, P =.49) and on coughing during the whole study period. Hemodynamics, intensity of motor block (Bromage scale), and side effects like nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and bladder disfunction also did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that thoracic epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.375% provides comparable pain relief and incidence of side effects after major abdominal gynecologic surgery as bupivacaine 0.125% in combination with 0.5 microg/mL(-1) sufentanil and may therefore represent an alternative in epidural pain management.

Adult↗