Erol Sandalcioglu | PubMed Health

PubMed2005

Intraoperative functional MRI: implementation and preliminary experience.

For a non-invasive identification of eloquent brain areas in neurosurgical procedures up to now only preoperative functional brain mapping techniques are available. These are based, e.g., on preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations in awake patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility to perform fMRI during neurosurgical procedures in anesthetized patients. For that purpose, a passive stimulation paradigm with peripheral nerve stimulation was applied. A 1.5-T MR scanner placed in a radiofrequency-shielded operating room with an adapted operating table was used for intraoperative fMRI. The fMRI data were analyzed during acquisition by an online statistical evaluation package installed on the MR scanner console. In addition, phase reversal of somatosensory evoked potentials was used for verification of intraoperative fMRI. In four anesthetized patients with lesions in the vicinity of the central region a total of 11 fMRI measurements were successfully acquired and analyzed online. Activation was found in the somatosensory cortex, which could be confirmed by intraoperative phase reversal for each measurement. Furthermore, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was employed for an extensive offline data analysis. We did not observe any neurological deterioration or complications due to the stimulation technique. Intraoperative fMRI is technically feasible allowing a real-time identification of eloquent brain areas despite brain shift.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Functional magnetic resonance imaging in anesthetized patients: a relevant step toward real-time intraoperative functional neuroimaging.

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of intraoperative 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging may provide up-to-date functional information in the surgical environment. However, feasible passive paradigms that allow the examination of anesthetized patients will be a precondition for intraoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a recently developed passive fMRI paradigm for functional neuroimaging in anesthetized patients. METHODS: We investigated four anesthetized patients with intracranial pathological conditions not related to the sensorimotor cortex. All patients had been anesthetized with standard total intravenous anesthesia for more than 24 hours before the fMRI scan. Anesthesia and monitoring were sustained during the scanning procedure. A simultaneous electrical stimulation of the median and tibial nerves was applied to elicit a cortical activation using a custom-designed magnetoelectrically shielded conductor. Statistical evaluation using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College, London, England) and the Talairach Daemon Client (Version 1.1; Research Imaging Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX) followed. RESULTS: Three of four patients showed a good activation of the sensorimotor cortex under anesthesia. In one patient, no significant activation was observed, presumably as a result of increased body impedance because of severe edema. Standard dosages of the narcotics did not influence the cortical response; however, stimulation intensity had to be increased compared with awake patients. We did not detect relevant interferences with magnetic resonance imaging arising from the technical setup. CONCLUSION: The method presented proved to be a feasible paradigm for fMRI evaluation of the sensorimotor cortex in anesthetized patients and thus forms a relevant step toward real intraoperative functional neuroimaging.

Aged↗