PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Erskine A James

Publications and source records attributed to Erskine A James.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a prolonged paced QRS duration increases the risk of cardiac dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical pacing mimics left bundle branch block, results in a prolonged QRS duration of variable duration, and causes ventricular desynchronization. METHODS: In the Mode Selection Trial (MOST), QRS duration was measured in patients who had at least one paced ventricular complex recorded on 12-lead ECG within 3 months of enrollment (early) and after 9 months (late). Clinical endpoints including heart failure hospitalization, mortality, and atrial fibrillation were analyzed. A total of 1,026 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 75 years (25th, 75th percentiles = 69, 80) and median ejection fraction prior to implant was 55% (45, 60). The cumulative percent ventricular pacing (DDDR and VVIR) was 81% over a median follow-up of 33 months. During period, 123 patients had heart failure hospitalization, 197 died, and 261 patients had atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that paced QRS duration was a strong predictor of heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.07,1.23) for each 10-ms increase in paced QRS duration (P = .001). The increased risk was unaffected by adjustment for other known predictors of heart failure hospitalization in the study. Paced QRS duration was not significant for mortality (P = .41) or atrial fibrillation (P = .20) when baseline QRS duration and other predictors were included. CONCLUSIONS: Paced QRS duration is a significant, independent predictor of heart failure hospitalization in patients with sinus node dysfunction. A very long paced QRS duration is associated with increased heart failure hospitalization.

Aged↗

Clinical and quality of life comparison of accelerometer, piezoelectric crystal, and blended sensors in DDDR-paced patients with sinus node dysfunction in the mode selection trial (MOST).

INTRODUCTION: Permanent pacemakers are capable of increasing heart rate in response to physical activity by a variety of sensors including accelerometers, piezoelectric crystals, or blended sensors. The impact of these different physiologic sensors on cardiovascular events and quality of life is not known. METHODS: Of 2,010 patients randomized in the Mode Selection Trial, 1,245 patients were selected with the most commonly used pacemakers with these three sensors. Clinical characteristics and quality of life were compared between groups at baseline, 3 months, and then yearly. RESULTS: There were 449 patients with an accelerometer sensor device, 682 with a piezoelectric sensor, and 114 with a blended sensor. The groups were similar in terms of age (mean 74 years), gender, and cardiac risk factors but differences existed in weight, heart rate, mitral regurgitation, revascularization history, and drug therapy. The median ventricular pacing frequency was 80% (25th, 75th percentiles 42, 97). After a median follow-up of 33.1 months, the risk of death, heart failure hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, and the combined endpoint of mortality and stroke was not significantly different between the sensor types, after adjustment for baseline differences. Quality of life analyses demonstrated that patients with blended sensors had significantly worse (P < 0.01) physical function than did patients with the other two sensor systems. Moreover, patients receiving blended sensors had the poorest absolute scores, without reaching statistical significance, on 9 of 13 quality of life measures after adjusting for differences in the groups. CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences among the three most utilized sensors in clinical endpoints. Those patients who received blended sensors had worse physical function quality of life scores. However, clinical selection of the most sophisticated sensor for the most ill patients cannot be excluded as an explanation of these results.

Aged↗

Prevention of cardiovascular complications of diabetes mellitus by aspirin.

Eighteen million Americans have type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) while another 40 million have impaired glucose tolerance. Atherosclerotic heart disease is the leading cause of death in patients with diabetes mellitus. In addition to the increased risk for CardioVascular Disease (CVD), patients with diabetes have a worse prognosis than nondiabetics when they suffer an ischemic event. Insulin resistance is increasingly recognized as a chronic, low-level, inflammatory state. Hyperinsulinemia has been proposed as the forerunner of hypertension, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, abdominal obesity, and altered glucose tolerance, linking all these abnormalities to the development of coronary vascular disease. Atherosclerosis and insulin resistance share similar pathophysiological mechanisms, due to the actions of proinflammatory cytokines. The dynamic inflammatory milieu found in diabetes explains the susceptibility of diabetics to CVD and the potential mechanism by which aspirin may prevent CVD in diabetics. Aspirin decreases the risk for CVD in diabetic patients by a variety of established and novel mechanisms. Therapeutic strategies that lesson the CVD risk in diabetic patients, including the use of aspirin for primary and secondary prevention, are potentially very important. This review article addresses the antiatherosclerotic effects of aspirin, the potential anti-diabetic effects of aspirin, and the clinical trial evidence for CVD prevention by aspirin in diabetics. We also present recommendations for the use of aspirin in the diabetic population and the current guidelines put forth by the American Heart Association and by the American Diabetes Association.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Window to the heart: the value of a native and paced QRS duration. Current perspective and review.

Given the technological advances and reliance upon expensive testing for guiding therapy, it is surprising how an inexpensive, low tech electrocardiogram can provide a wealth of information pertaining to the underlying cardiovascular status of a patient. In this article we review the changes in hemodynamics, prognosis and guidance of therapeutic options associated with a prolonged QRS duration.

Bundle-Branch Block↗