PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eugenia Martella

Publications and source records attributed to Eugenia Martella.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Evaluation of HER-2/neu amplification and other biological markers as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in primary breast cancer: the role of anthracycline dose intensity.

OBJECTIVES: The value of HER-2/neu status as a predictor of response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is still a matter of debate. We evaluated the contribution of HER-2/neu gene amplification and other biologic markers in predicting response to different doses of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Clinical and pathologic records of 115 primary breast cancer patients were reviewed. Forty-eight and 67 patients received high (doxorubicin > or =20 mg/m2/wk; epirubicin > or =30 mg/m2/wk) and moderate-low anthracycline dose intensity regimens, respectively. Pathologic diagnosis, hormonal receptor status (HR), Ki67, and HER-2/neu status were assessed on tumor samples before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HER-2/neu was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: HER-2/neu amplification was observed in 29/115 (25%) tumors, 18 from moderate-low-dose and 11 from high-dose group. In the univariate analysis, a high Ki67 index (> or =20%) and positive clinical axillary nodes were predictive of an objective tumor response (P = 0.033 and 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, Ki67 was the only factor predictive of response (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, P = 0.03). HER-2/neu status was not a factor in predicting objective response to different anthracycline dose intensities. The same finding was observed with regards to HR and Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, no significant dose-response relationship was found according to HER-2/neu status.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

HER-2/neu amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cytologic samples from distant metastatic sites of breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene has been proposed as a target for antibody-based therapies and as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness in advanced breast carcinoma. Few studies have concentrated on HER-2/neu gene evaluation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on distant metastatic sites and none have been performed on cytologic samples. The current study evaluated HER-2/neu amplification by FISH on cytologic samples obtained from distant metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma to update HER-2/neu characterization through a safe and easier procedure than biopsy. METHODS: Twenty-two cytologic samples from distant metastases (12 hepatic samples, 4 skin samples, 3 pleural samples, and 3 peritoneal samples) were submitted to HER-2/neu evaluation by FISH. Seventeen corresponding primary breast tumors also were evaluated by FISH on paraffin histologic sections or on destained archival cytologic smears. RESULTS: Seven of the 22 metastases (32%) were amplified. Amplification was observed in 4 of the 12 liver metastases, in 1of the 3 ascitic fluid specimens, and in 2 of the 4 skin metastases. In all the three pleural fluid specimens, HER-2/neu was unamplified. Matched results from primary and metastatic lesions were obtained in 14 cases (5 were amplified and 9 were unamplified on both primary and metastatic tumors). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study emphasized the feasibility and advantages of two rapid and very informative techniques, such as fine-needle aspiration biopsy and FISH. Both procedures were performed to ascertain the malignant nature of a suspicious lesion and to obtain predictive markers for response. Since the advent of trastuzumab, the characterization of the molecular profile in metastatic breast disease has become increasingly important for targeted therapy selection.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Molecular profile and clinical variables in BRCA1-positive breast cancers. A population-based study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features of breast cancer patients with genetic susceptibility to this disease and to investigate the contribution of BRCA1 germline mutations to the phenotype of these tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 102 women with suspected inherited susceptibility to breast cancer consecutively seen at the Genetic Oncology Service of Parma, Italy. Sixty-two patients with a high probability of harboring a germline, cancer-predisposing mutation were tested for BRCA1 mutations. Exon 11 was screened using the protein truncation test and detected mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing (DS). All other exons were analyzed by DS. RESULTS: Among the 62 patients with a completed mutation analysis, 48 (77.4%) had wild-type BRCA1, six (9.6%) had variants of unclear significance, eight (13%) had deleterious mutations. BRCA1-associated breast cancers (BABC) were significantly less likely to be diagnosed at stage I than breast cancers in women without mutations (12.5% vs 51%; P = 0.045), more likely to have a high proliferation rate (100% vs 24%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be histological grade 3 (100% vs 14%, P < 0.001), estrogen and progesterone receptor negative (87.5% vs 13%, P < 0.001; 75% vs 23%, P = 0.004), and p53 positive (87.5% vs 30%, P = 0.023). All tumors with BRCA1 mutations were HER-2/neu negative compared with 57% of the non-BRCA1 tumors (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between BABC and non-BABC in 20-year relapse-free survival, 20-year event-free survival, and 20-year overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, BABC seems to present with adverse molecular features when compared with non-BABC, although the prognosis appears to be similar.

Adult↗